Very Weak Durable Goods Orders

January 27th, 2015 9:38 am

Via Stephen Stanley at Amherst Pierpont Securities:

This release is extremely weak.  Virtually every key metric is disappointing for December and revised down for November.  Business investment spending showed a brief spurt in Q2 and Q3, getting many economists excited that the long-awaited revival in business spending had finally arrived.  As you know, I have been skeptical on this front, and today’s numbers are stunningly soft, which should pour a hefty pitcher of cold water on those optimistic sentiments regarding business investment in 2015.  This does not mean that the economy cannot perform well in 2015, as consumption is still in a position to lead the way, and housing seems poised to strengthen at least somewhat as well.  In fact, a scenario where consumer spending and housing do substantially better and business investment continues to languish is exactly the one that I had drawn up for 2015.

Back to today’s numbers.  The headline durable goods orders figure sank by 3.4%, driven down mostly by a sharp drop in the volatile aircraft sector.  Excluding defense and aircraft, bookings were basically flat (+0.1%) but were still modestly softer than anticipated.  Excluding transportation, orders slipped by 0.8%, about 1½ percentage points worse than I had projected.  The kicker to the weak December is that the November figures were also revised noticeably lower.  The headline gauge in November was revised downward by 1.2 percentage points to -2.1%, though again much of the revision came from the volatile aircraft category.  Excluding defense and aircraft, the downward adjustment to November was only 0.3 percentage points.  So, it would not be entirely unfair to argue that outside of the aircraft sector, the numbers are only modestly weaker.  That is not untrue, but the context is still not good, as the “core” orders (ex defense and aircraft) figures have been down in 3 of the past 5 months (and the up months were +0.1% and +0.2%) and are down 2.6% cumulatively since July.

I find the capital goods figures to be equally disappointing.  The December tally for capital goods orders ex defense and aircraft was -0.6%, marking a fourth consecutive monthly decline.  This gauge is down 4.0% since August and for the 12 months of 2014 posted a rise of only 1.4%.  Similarly, the core capital goods shipments figure declined by 0.2% in December along with a 0.4 percentage point downward revision to the November result.  The core capital goods shipments figures have also posted three consecutive monthly falls.  I had a flat number penciled in for real business spending on equipment in my Q4 GDP forecast.  I am not eager to mark my estimate down since out of 81 estimates on Bloomberg, I am 3rd from the bottom at 2.4%.  Nonetheless, the monthly shipments numbers point to an outright decline in this category in Q4.  Perhaps more importantly, the orders data do not offer much hope of a solid performance in Q1 either.  As you know, I have believed for several years now that the policy environment, between major marginal tax rate hikes on investment income, a regulatory atmosphere that has been growth-unfriendly and at times downright hostile to business, and lingering uncertainty over the outlook (will we or won’t we get corporate tax reform, where is the next regulatory shoe going to drop, etc.), has kept corporate managers nervous and has thus limited the growth in investment.  Today’s data suggests that this will continue into 2015.

What to Watch for Today

January 27th, 2015 6:48 am

Via Bloomberg:
WHAT TO WATCH:
* (All times New York)
Economic Data
* 8:30am: Durable Goods Orders, Dec., est. 0.4% (prior -0.7%,
revised -0.9%)
* Durables Ex-Transportation, Dec., est. 0.6% (prior
-0.4%, revised -0.7%)
* Cap Goods Orders Nondef Ex Air, Dec., est. 0.9% (prior
0.0%, revised -0.5%)
* Cap Goods Ship Nondef Ex Air, Dec., est. 1% (prior 0.2%,
revised -0.2%)
* Cap Goods Ship Nondef Ex Air, Dec., est. 1% (prior 0.2%,
revised -0.2%)</li></ul>
* 9:00am: S&P/CS 20 City m/m, Nov., 0.65% (prior 0.76%)
* S&P/CS Composite-20 y/y, Nov., est. 4.3% (prior 4.50%)
* S&P/CaseShiller 20-City Index NSA, Nov. (prior 173.36)
* S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. HPI y/y, Nov., est. 4.6% (prior
4.64%)
* S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. HPI NSA, Nov. (prior 167.11)
* 9:45am: Markit US Composite PMI, Jan. prelim. (prior
53.5)
* Markit U.S. Services PMI, Jan. prelim., est. 53.8 (prior
53.3)
* Markit U.S. Services PMI, Jan. prelim., est. 53.8 (prior
53.3)</li></ul>
* 10:00am: New Home Sales m/m, Dec., est. 2.7% (prior -1.6%)
* New Home Sales, Dec., est. 450k (prior 438k)
* New Home Sales, Dec., est. 450k (prior 438k)</li></ul>
* 10:00am: Consumer Confidence Index, Jan., est. 95.5 (prior
92.6)
* 10:00am: Richmond Fed Mfg Index, Jan., est. 5 (prior 7)
Central Banks
* TBA: Fed policy meeting begins
Supply
* Auctions of $15b 2Y FRN, $26b 2Y notes rescheduled for Jan.
28 due to weather

FX

January 27th, 2015 6:44 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman

Euro In the Crosscurrents

– Comments by SNB officials along with anecdotal reports of intervention lifted the euro-franc pair to the highest level since the breaking of the peg
– The changes in intra-EU political risk stemming from the Greek elections are multifaceted and continue to develop
– GDP numbers out of the UK were slightly weaker than expected, but are unlikely to make difference for the BOE monetary policy, or in the tight  race for elections in May
– S&P cut Russia by one notch to Ba1 and kept the negative outlook
– The Hungarian central bank meets and is expected to keep rates steady at 2.1%

Price action:  The dollar is mostly weaker against the majors.  The Swiss franc is outperforming amidst rumors of SNB intervention in EUR/CHF, while the loonie and sterling are underperforming.  Sterling was dented by weaker than expected Q4 GDP growth.  The euro is slightly firmer, trading just below $1.13, while cable is just below $1.51.  Dollar/yen is lower and testing the 118 area.  EM currencies are mostly firmer.  RUB is outperforming, but still has not recouped its losses from S&P’s downgrade to junk yesterday.  ZAR, TRY, and MXN are underperforming.  MSCI Asia Pacific is up 1.1%, driven by a 1.7% gain in the Nikkei.  Euro Stoxx 600 is down 0.3% near midday, while S&P futures are pointing to a lower open.  Greek 10-year yields are up 44 bp, and dragging the rest of the periphery up by 2-4 bp.  

  • The euro has bounced back nicely from the Greek election-related selling and appears somewhat directionless in the near-term.  The currency is being pulled by at least four major forces:  (1) the political downside risks – which extend far beyond Greece; (2) The gyrations of FX policy by the Swiss National Bank, and the bounce in the EUR/CHF cross; (3), the ever-growing divergence in monetary policy, especially vis-à-vis the US, which we have already discussed extensively and we think will prevail in the end; and (4) a market that perceives the short euro trade as one way, and that has possibly become somewhat extended in this trade.
  • Overnight, the main driver was probably the comments by SNB officials along with anecdotal reports of intervention lifted the euro-franc pair to the highest level since the breaking of the peg.  The SNB Vice President Danthine stated that the institution was prepared for currency intervention.  We also note that data showed sight deposits of the SNB rose by 8% last week.  This is the most since July 2013.  It is true that there could be other reasons for this increase, such as if the SNB boosted repos of its securities, but intervention is the most likely explanation. As we had argued before, the SNB’s balance sheet will still increase, but it can be more strategic than defending a Maginot line.  EUR/CHF has been very volatile overnight, rising to a high near CHF 1.03825 before falling back to nearly flat on the day.  The pair is still up almost 3% this week. The move helped the euro move higher against other crosses and likely led to some short-covering that drove a break above the $1.13 level against the dollar.
  • In the medium-term, the changes in intra-EU political risk stemming from the Greek elections are multifaceted and continue to develop. The fact that a government was formed quickly eliminated the risk of a prolonged period of political uncertainty in Greece.  This helped markets get some relief, albeit short lived.  However, the choice of coalition, the right-wing Independent Greeks party, creates other areas of friction.  While some periphery countries are worried about their emboldened left political flank (Portugal’s Left Bloc and especially Spain’s Podemos, whose leader went to meet Tsipras after his victory), Germany and France are more concerned about their right flank.  Even though Syriza’s nationalistic coalition partner is a far cry from the ultra-right Golden Dawn, it’s likely to leave Germany and France in a harder political position to negotiate.  France’s Marine Le Pen, for example, characterized the new government as “the start of the trial of the euro-austerity.”  All in all, we stick to our view that there will be no Grexit, but there will be turbulent times ahead.
  • Separately, Italy’s presidential election process will begin towards the end of the week.  Prime Minister Renzi may compromise with Berlusconi (after the third round) in order to maintain support for his reform agenda.  It is unlikely to be as dramatic as events in Greece.  We note that the two main opposition parties in Italy claim they want to leave monetary union.  
  • Today’s GDP numbers out of the UK were slightly weaker than expected, but are unlikely to make a difference for BOE monetary policy, or in the tight race for elections in May.  UK Q4 GDP growth came in at 2.7% y/y.  The Q3 reading was 2.6%.  Domestic demand remains as one of the main drivers of growth in the UK. The service sector grew 0.8% q/q while the industry showed a disappointing 0.1% growth.  In light of sluggish growth and falling inflation, market expectations for the first BOE rate hike have been pushed further out in recent weeks, as evidenced by the price action in short sterling contracts,  
  • On the UK elections, all the recent polls make two clear points.  First, the race is impossible to call.  Labor and the Tories are neck and neck with a little over 30% each, and some sort of coalition government is all but certain.  Second, smaller parties have consolidated their positions as serious political players.  The sum of votes for the two major parties is expected to come in around 65% compared with 97% in 1951.  
  • During the North American session, the main US report is December durable goods orders.  Consensus is for headline to 0.4% m/m vs. -0.9% in November, ex-transport to rise 0.6% vs. -0.7% in November.  CaseShiller home prices, December new home sales, and January Richmond Fed index will also be reported.  From Europe, France will report December jobseekers during the North American session, with consensus at a 15.5k gain v. 27.4k in November.
  • S&P cut Russia Monday by one notch to Ba1 and kept the negative outlook.  We totally agree with this move to junk, as our model has Russia at BB+/Ba1/BB+.  But the situation remains fluid, and we could easily see more cuts ahead to BB or lower if the sanctions are widened and/or oil falls further.  The ruble remains vulnerable, and we cannot rule out a return to its lows from December.
  • The Hungarian central bank meets and is expected to keep rates steady at 2.1%.  While the bank is on hold for now, we think deepening deflation risks will lead to more easing in 2015.  Hungary then reports December PPI Friday.  For now, policymakers are signaling that the strong Swiss franc’s impact on Hungary will be limited.  For EUR/HUF, support seen near 310 and then 305, resistance seen near 315 and then 320.
  • Mexico reports December trade.  Export growth has slowed two straight months, though manufacturing strength has helped offset some weakness from the petroleum sector.  Banco de Mexico then meets Thursday and is expected to keep rates steady at 3.0%.  Inflation is falling sharply, and suggests that Carstens will likely reevaluate his outlook for higher Mexico rates in 2015.  For USD/MXN, support seen near 14.50, resistance seen near 15.00.  

January 27 2015 Opening

January 27th, 2015 6:41 am

Prices of Treasury coupon securities have registered modest gains in a quiescent overseas session. The yield curve is on balance flatter though 10s 30s is actually a tad steeper. The yield on the Benchmark 5 year note has edged lower to 1.332 from 1.342. The yield on the 7 year note has slipped to 1.623 from 1.637. The yield on the 10 year note dropped to 1.623 from 1.637. The yield on the Long Bond declined to 2.38 percent from 2.398 percent. The 5s 10s spread narrowed to 47.8 from 48.5. The 5s 30s spread narrowed to 104.8 from 105.6. The 10s 30s spread did widen a tad to 57 from 56.9. The 5s 7s and 7s 10s spread each narrowed about 0.5 basis points. The 2s 5s 10s spread richened to 33.5 from 33.8 and 5s 10s 30s richened to -9.2 from -8.4.

The level of activity in the Treasury market was subdued overnight. I think that traders are waiting for some clue from the FOMC when its meeting concludes tomorrow. In addition, some probably have trepidation about liquidity today as the snowstorm and attendant transportation shutdown will impair liquidity as only those within walking distance of their work stations in New York will make it to work. So volumes should be very light today. The only meaningful activity of which I am aware is some buying of the 5 year note by end users in Asian time. Notional amounts were quite small.

In overseas news GDP in the UK was weaker than expected.

The Treasury had originally planned to sell the 2 year note today and 5s and 7s on Wednesday and Thursday. The storm altered that plan and we will get a 2 year auction tomorrow and then 5s and 7s on Thursday. Some shorts probably covered on the schedule change and likely will be reset. One trader in a note remarks on the relative richness of 52s 5s 10s. On the day of the 7 year note auction in late December that spread traded at 54 basis points intraday. This morning the spread is 33 basis points. The auction last month came at a yield of 1.739 percent.  I would contend that we will need to price some concession into the spread and the outright level between now and auction time on Thursday. I am very wrong if the FOMC tweaks the wording and leads us to conclude that there is some wiggle room in their rate hike schedule and rate hikes are less likely in 2015.

Corporate Bond Trading Yesterday

January 27th, 2015 5:58 am

Via the good folks at Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Secondary Trading Volume Falls
2015-01-27 10:51:09.952 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Trace count for secondary trading ended at
$13.1b vs $16.6b Friday, the second highest Friday session since
Jan. 2005.
* 144a trading added $2b of IG volume vs $2.3b Friday
* 2 of the top-3 most active issues were under 3 years
maturity; half the top 10
* Most active issues longer than 3 years
* BPLN 2.75% 2023 was the day’s most active issue with
client buying near 3x selling, together accounting for
100% of volume
* AAPL 2.85% 2021 was next with client flows at 48%
* VZ 6.55% 2043 was 3rd, client buying twice selling
* VZ 6.55% 2043 was 3rd, client buying twice selling</li></ul>
* BABA 3.60% 2024 was most active 144a issue; client flows
took 69% of the volume
* BofAML IG Master Index at +149 vs +150; 2014 range was +151,
seen Dec 16; +106, the low and tightest spread since July
2007 was seen June 24
* Standard & Poor’s Global Fixed Income Research IG Index
unchanged at +181; +182, the wide for 2014-2015; +140, a
2014 low and new post-crisis low was seen July 30, 2014
* Click here for S&P spread history in a 10-year look back
* Markit CDX.IG.22 5Y Index at 65.8 vs 67.8; 76.1, the wide
for 2014 was seen Dec 16; 55 was seen July 3, the low for
2014 and the lowest level since Oct 2007
* IG issuance totaled $11.55b Monday
* Last week’s $28.2b of IG issuance; stats, tenors, ratings,
sectors
* Pipeline of expected domestic, SSA January issuers and M&A-
related deals for 2015

No Rigid Time Limit

January 27th, 2015 5:52 am

Reuters reports that Japan’s Economics Minister Amari has stated that there is no specific timetable for the Bank of Japan to meets its goal of 2 percent inflation target. He cites the decline in oil prices as a factor which will make it more difficult for the BOJ to quickly attain that target.

Via Reuters:

(Reuters) – Japanese Economics Minister Akira Amari said on Tuesday that the Bank of Japan could have some leeway in meeting its 2 percent inflation target, given declines in oil prices.

Amari, speaking to reporters after a cabinet meeting, also said neither the government nor the central bank has been committed to a rigid timeframe in achieving the price goal.

Cheap oil compounds the challenge for the BOJ’s aim of hitting its 2 percent inflation goal around the coming fiscal year that starts in April, which analysts see as impossible to achieve.

Last week, the central bank sharply cut its inflation forecast, and Governor Haruhiko Kuroda conceded it may take longer than expected to hit the price target.

(Reporting by Hitoshi Ishida; Writing by Tetsushi Kajimoto; Editing by Richard Borsuk)

 

Snowfall Link

January 26th, 2015 9:19 pm

This graphic courtesy of the NYTimes.

Deficit Declines to End

January 26th, 2015 9:12 pm

The NYTimes is carrying a piece on the budget deficit which has declined significantly since the head days of shovel ready stimulus in the early days of the Obama reign. The article notes that the deficit should edge lower again next year and then as the inexorable force of demographics exerts its gravitational pull the deficit (under current policy) will once again balloon as aging Baby Boomers collect their inter generational chits.

Via the NYTimes;

WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficit will continue to inch downward through next year, but even with the economy on an upward trajectory, the government’s red ink will begin to rise in 2017 and expand with an aging population, the Congressional Budget Office said Monday.

The new budget projections effectively signal the end of the steep decline in deficits as the economy climbed out of the recession. Lawmakers now face a familiar and politically vexing problem: What to do about increases in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security spending that reflect the nation’s demographics, not its economic health?

“The past will catch up to us no matter how fast we run from it,” said Senator Michael B. Enzi, Republican of Wyoming, the new chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.

The forecast might not change President Obama’s policy proposals, which will come out on Monday, but it will fortify a Republican Congress’s resolve to pass budgets this spring that would fundamentally reorder health care spending, preserve tough spending caps and force Washington to at least look at Social Security. Democrats will say those spending plans are contradicted by efforts to overhaul the tax code without producing any more tax revenue.

And a budget season that will begin in earnest with the release of the president’s tax-and-spending plan for the fiscal year 2016 will underscore a partisan divide over post-recession policy making.

The budget office said on Monday that the deficit would fall to $468 billion this year and $467 billion in 2016, or 2.5 percent of the economy, from $483 billion in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30. It would be the lowest level since 2007.

Then it is projected to rise steadily, to $489 billion in 2017 and $953 billion by 2023. By 2025, the annual deficit will be back over $1 trillion. The budget office forecasts that under current policy, the government will add $7.6 trillion to the $18 trillion federal debt over the coming decade.

Calling the report a “sober reminder” of the nation’s challenges, Representative Tom Price, Republican of Georgia and the new House Budget Committee chairman, said: “There’s no reason it has to be this way. With innovative thinking, real accountability, and more efficient and effective policies, we can solve our fiscal challenges while restoring strength and confidence to our economy.”

The parties, however, remain deeply divided about the kind of policies that would slow the rise of deficits. Senator Bernard Sanders, independent of Vermont, who caucuses with Democrats and is the new ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, anticipated the change in direction with a new report focused on wage stagnation and the shriveling middle class. The Budget Committee has long been led by senators from both parties who have approached their jobs with a focus on balanced budgets.

Mr. Sanders has signaled that he wants to use his post to speak more broadly about the nation’s economic health. His budget report calls for increasing spending on infrastructure and education, protecting Social Security benefits and taxing rising affluence more heavily.

“While we must continue to focus on the federal deficit, we must also be aware that there are other deficits in our society that have been causing horrendous pain for the vast majority of the American people,” Mr. Sanders said. “These are deficits in jobs, deficits in infrastructure, deficits in income, deficits in equality, deficits in retirement security, deficits in education and deficits in trade.”

The budget office report had plenty of good news in the short run, even as it tempered it with long-term warnings. The office predicted solid economic growth through 2016, good political news for Democrats as they enter the presidential campaign season. The Democratic candidate to succeed Mr. Obama will likely be able to boast of a steady climb from the recession and unbroken private-sector job growth.

But over the medium term, budget office economists are tempering their optimism. In August, they had predicted the gross domestic product to rise an average of 2.7 percent between 2014 and 2018. On Monday, they lowered that forecast to 2.5 percent. Between 2020 and 2025, growth will slow to 2.2 percent, the budget office said, as more baby boomers retire and the economy begins to suffer from fewer workers and higher debt.

Already, the national debt, at 74 percent of the economy, is higher than at any time except during and just after World War II.

“There is no denying that substantial fiscal progress has been made in the last few years. But there is equally no denying that we have a ways to go still,” said William G. Gale, an economist at the Brookings Institution.

With no changes in policy, aging baby boomers will take more and more of the federal government’s money, with less and less available for anything else. Social Security spending will rise to 5.7 percent of the economy in 2025 from 4.9 percent next year. Health care spending will rise over that period to 6.2 percent from 5.3 percent, while spending to service the national debt will double, to 3 percent from 1.5 percent.

All other spending will shrink to 7.4 percent from 9.2 percent.

“The C.B.O.’s report is clear — entitlement spending, if not reformed, will drive our deficits and debt to unsustainable levels in the very near future, and unsustainable entitlement spending will continue to crowd out spending in other areas,” said Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. “Leaders in Washington must stop turning a blind eye.”

How the parties avoid that situation could dominate much of the political debate over the next two years, as both Republicans and Democrats claim to champion the cause of the middle class, but with very different economic prescriptions.

 

Russian Rubble

January 26th, 2015 6:37 pm

Via the wsj:

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services on Monday cut its credit rating on Russia to junk, putting it below investment-grade territory for the first time in more than 10 years.

Heavily dependent on oil exports that are priced in U.S. dollars, Russia faces mounting pressure from U.S. and European officials over the unrest in eastern Ukraine. On Saturday, U.S. and European leaders threatened new sanctions against Moscow.

S&P lowered Russia’s rating to double-B-plus from triple-B-minus and kept a negative outlook, indicating it could lower the country’s ratings further.

The ruble, which has been in a free fall amid slumping oil prices and geopolitical unrest in the region, was trading at about 68 rubles to the dollar Monday, compared with about 35 rubles a year ago.

Despite the downgrade, Russia remains classified as investment-grade, based on most global fixed-income indexes’ rules. Another downgrade to junk level—it is rated triple-B-minus by Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings—would render Russia ineligible for most investment-grade indexes.

 

“The downgrade was largely as expected,” said Tim Ash, a strategist at Standard Bank . “This reflects a combination of lower oil prices, sanctions and the conflict in Ukraine with the difficult geopolitical tussle with the West which shows no sign of easing. These factors have and are expected to continue to weigh on Russia’s balance sheet and overall credit matrix.”

Mr. Ash said he expects Fitch and Moody’s to follow.

On Dec. 23, S&P placed the country on negative watch, indicating a downgrade was likely, citing the rapid deterioration of its monetary flexibility and the impact of the weakening economy on the country’s financial system.

“The outlook is already very bleak as the economy is firmly on the path that leads to recession following the sharp fall in oil and the full-scale currency crisis that unfolded in December,” said Piotr Matys, a rates strategist at Rabobank.

The downgrade to junk cements the underlying trend of investors selling off their assets in Russia, which means that Russia’s central bank will have to support the ruble by keeping interest rates at 17% and may have to intervene directly in the foreign-exchange market, Mr. Matys said.

“If capital outflows accelerate and international reserves continue to shrink rapidly, market speculations that Russia might implement capital controls are likely to escalate,” he said.

S&P said it expects Russia’s economy to expand by about 0.5% annually from 2015 through 2018—below the 2.4% rate of the previous years—and the government to post an average annual deficit of 2.5% over that period. Inflation, S&P said, will rise above 10% in 2015.

On Jan. 16, Moody’s cut Russia’s ratings to the brink of junk territory, bringing it in line with Fitch’s rating, and noted it was reviewing the country’s balance sheet, particularly its foreign-currency-reserves cushion.

“Moody’s caught up and they struck an appropriately negative tone when they kept Russia on review for another downgrade,” said Per Hammarlund, a strategist at SEB.

He added: “Given the weakness of the ruble and the high level of local rates, international lenders and investors will be attracted to Russia if sanctions are eased. Even if they don’t fully reverse net capital outflows, it will ease the burden on public finances and the pressure on” the central bank’s reserves.

“In addition,” Mr. Hammarlund said, “if oil prices find a floor as seems reasonable in the second or third quarter and recover toward the end of 2015, both public finances and the ruble will look better.”

Blizzard Impacts Treasury Auction Schedule

January 26th, 2015 3:02 pm

Via Bloomberg:

BFW 01/26 15:56 *TREASURY SAYS FIVE-YEAR NOTE SALE NOW THURSDAY INSTEAD OF WED.
BN 01/26 15:56 *TREASURY SAYS FIVE-YEAR NOTE SALE NOW THURSDAY INSTEAD OF WED.
BFW 01/26 15:56 *TREASURY CHANGES BILL, NOTE AUCTION TIMES BECAUSE OF WEATHER
BFW 01/26 15:56 *TREASURY SAYS FOUR-WEEK BILL AUCTION TO TAKE PLACE TODAY
BN 01/26 15:56 *TREASURY SAYS TWO-YEAR NOTE SALE NOW WEDNESDAY INSTEAD OF TUES.
BN 01/26 15:55 *TREASURY SAYS FOUR-WEEK BILL AUCTION TO TAKE PLACE TODAY
BN 01/26 15:54 *TREASURY CHANGES BILL, NOTE AUCTION TIMES BECAUSE