Bookies Say Brexit Vote Will Fail

June 21st, 2016 5:40 am

Via Bloomberg:

  • Gamblers pour money on U.K. to stay in the European Union
  • One gambler places 315,000-pound bet on Brexit rejection

Bookies and gamblers are strengthening in their conviction that the U.K. will opt to remain in the European Union, as polls show a swing away from a so-called Brexit.

Ladbrokes Plc said late on Monday that the odds on a “Remain” vote had shortened to a 2/7 chance, indicating a 74 percent probability. Some 95 percent of all referendum wagers in the previous 24 hours had been placed on voters rejecting Brexit.

“As far as the money’s concerned, it looks like Brexit is beginning to fall at the final hurdle,” Jessica Bridge, a spokeswoman for Ladbrokes, said in an e-mailed statement.

Polls released since the killing of pro-EU campaigner Jo Cox have suggested the “Remain” camp is gaining ground, producing the swing back toward the vote to stay that bookies and gamblers anticipated before her death. One gambler has wagered 315,000 pounds ($463,000) on the U.K. staying in the EU, Betfair said.

“This market continues to mimic the pattern of the Scottish referendum, where historical confidence in the eventual ‘No’ vote slipped slightly ten days before referendum day only to resettle in the week of the vote,” said Naomi Totten of Betfair, which places about a 75 percent probability on the U.K. opting to stay inside the EU.

At one point last week, bookies were placing about a 40 percent chance on the U.K. voting to exit, and differences in polling results for the respective campaigns show the outcome of Thursday’s vote isn’t yet a foregone conclusion.

A YouGov poll of 1,652 voters for the Times newspaper published late on Monday showed “Leave” at 44 percent and 42 percent for “Remain,” while a survey of 800 people by ORB for the Daily Telegraph had “Remain” at 53 percent and “Leave” at 46 percent once those unsure of voting were stripped out.

German Court Ruling on ECB Bond Buying program

June 21st, 2016 5:37 am

Via WSJ:
By Tom Fairless and
Todd Buell
June 21, 2016 4:40 a.m. ET
0 COMMENTS

FRANKFURT—Germany’s top court ruled Tuesday that an unlimited bond-buying program created by the European Central Bank at the height of Europe’s debt crisis complies with German law, ending a yearslong legal challenge to a program credited with easing fears of a breakup of the currency zone.

The verdict is an important victory for ECB President Mario Draghi over his German critics at a time of renewed tensions between the ECB and its biggest shareholder, Germany.

The program, called Outright Monetary Transactions, or OMT, was created in September 2012, weeks after Mr. Draghi pledged to do “whatever it takes” to save the euro. While the program has never been used, the mere prospect of a flood of ECB funds to buy the bonds of vulnerable eurozone governments was credited with restoring investors’ confidence in the single currency.

The OMT program “doesn’t currently compromise the budgetary responsibility of Germany’s Parliament,” provided conditions specified by the European Union’s top court are respected, Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court said Tuesday.

Still, it doesn’t yet mark the end of the legal challenges in Germany over ECB bond purchases. Four lawsuits have been filed with the constitutional court against the ECB’s latest bond-purchase program, known as quantitative easing, a court spokeswoman said. A date for a decision has yet to be set.

Write to Tom Fairless at [email protected] and Todd Buell at [email protected]

 

Early FX

June 21st, 2016 5:31 am

Via Kit Juckes at SocGen:

<http://www.sgmarkets.com/r/?id=h10c422e6,1762aa21,1762aa22&p1=136122&p2=4c98951816bacf84d48f4c771637c015>
There was a strawberry moon last night to greet the start of the gradual shortening of Northern Hemisphere days. I spent much of the evening in a referendum Q&A in a park, confirming that most people will vote on an emotional reaction to immigration or on fear about the economic implications of leaving. To say the level of debate hasn’t really moved on in recent weeks would be a huge under-statement.
Betting odds imply a 76% chance of the UK remaining in the EU this morning, as three new opinion polls are published, with two showing a lead for ‘Remain’ (ORB for the Telegraph and Natcen), and only one for ‘Leave’ (YouGov for the Times). Sterling is holding on to yesterday’s gains and volatility in the FX market is slipping back sharply from the super-high levels reached recently. I’m sure there will be more ebbing and flowing in polls and sentiment but for now, sterling shorts are still being squeezed.

GBP/USD 1-month volatility

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/227707/1]

The rest of the markets are being led by the UK referendum mood. So, Asian equities are up again and the only two currencies that are weaker against the dollar are the yen (again) and the Rupee (also for a second day). The second chart shows the 52-week sum of foreign buying of Japan bonds and selling of Japanese equities. Sales of Japanese equities correlate with a stronger yen, partly (but not only) because foreign buyers of equities are likely to hedge the currency exposure, so selling requires them to close hedges. If you buy this line of argument, the flood of money leaving the Nikkei is causing a largely one-off yen appreciation and once the re-balancing of portfolios is over, the move will peter out. Not, of course, until after the UK vote, and perhaps not until real yield differentials calm down.

Foreigners sell Japanese equities and buy back the yen

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/227707/2]

RBA Minutes didn’t tell us anything new – solid growth is offsetting low inflation and for now the RBA is on hold. AUD will follow the global risk mood. AUD/NZD has found support at 1.04, and if it’s still here on Friday is worth a buy. Otherwise, with Asian equities up, and oil marginally softer, there is no new news.

Ahead today we have the German Constitutional Court ruling on the ECB’s OMT, and the first round of Janet Yellen’s semi-annual testimony to lawmakers. If Ms Yellen were to backtrack on any of last week’s post-FOMC dovishness, that would shake markets up, but unless she’s suddenly developed a mischievous streak, it seems unlikely she’ll do more than ensure markets simply here the same message again – rates will go up a bit in due course but there’s no rush. As for the OMT ruling, it’s important for the ECB’s remit, but probably won’t shake market confidence in Mr Draghi’s ‘Whatever it Takes’ commitment.

Soros on Brexit and Sterling

June 20th, 2016 9:49 pm

Via Bloomberg:

  • Pound may fall more than 20%, Soros writes in Guardian
  • Bank of England would have no room to lower interest rates

Billionaire investor George Soros said the pound may slump more than 20 percent against the dollar if British voters decided to leave the European Union, a devaluation bigger and more disruptive than when he profited by betting against the currency in 1992.

“Brexit would make some people very rich, but most voters considerably poorer,” Soros wrote in an op-ed published in the U.K.’s Guardian newspaper on Tuesday.

The pound would fall by at least 15 percent if the nation votes to leave the trading block and potentially more than 20 percent to below $1.15, the investor wrote. He said voters are grossly underestimating the true costs of Brexit, which will have an “immediate and dramatic impact” on financial markets, investments and jobs.

Governments and investors around the world are closely monitoring the June 23 referendum amid concern that a U.K. decision to leave the EU would spark turmoil across financial markets. The pound surged the most since 2008 on Monday, spurring a global rally in higher-yielding currencies, as polls signalled the campaign to remain in the EU was gaining momentum.

 

The day after the referendum, the pound will either sink to the lowest level in more than three decades or climb toward the highest this year, according to a Bloomberg survey of economists. In the event of a leave vote, most forecasters saw the pound falling to a range from $1.25 to $1.40, while a decision to remain could boost the currency within its current range or beyond $1.50.

A more than 20 percent slump would result in the pound at a level that would ironically mean the currency would be worth about one euro, a method of “joining the euro” that nobody in Britain would want, Soros said.

Soros said a large devaluation of the pound would be less benign than in 1992 because the Bank of England won’t be able to cut interest rates if voters decide to leave the EU since rates are already at low levels. The central bank will also have little room to move in the strong likelihood of a recession after Brexit caused by a decline in house prices and a loss of jobs.

“Today, there are speculative forces in the markets much bigger and more powerful,” Soros said. “And they will be eager to exploit any miscalculations by the British government or British voters.”

Soros cited Britain’s large current account deficit, larger than 1992 and 2008, saying the nation is more dependent than ever on foreign capital. After a Brexit, capital flows would reverse, especially during the two years of uncertainty when Britain negotiates its exit from the EU, he wrote.

Soros said a post-Brexit devaluation is unlikely to result in an improvement in manufacturing exports that was seen after 1992 because trading conditions will be too uncertain for British businesses to make new investments, hire more workers or add to export capacity.

Soros rose to fame as the money manager who broke the BOE in 1992, netting a profit of $1 billion with a wager that the U.K. would be forced to devalue the pound and pull it from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. Soros said in the op-ed that he was “fortunate” to make a substantial profit for his hedge fund investors at the expense of the BOE and the British government.

The pound’s devaluation in 1992 “actually proved very helpful to the British economy, and subsequently I was even praised for my role in helping to bring it about,” he said.

Soros, who built a $24 billion fortune through savvy wagers on financial markets, returned money to outside investors five years ago and his New York-based firm, Soros Fund Management, now manages his own wealth.

On the Slumping Male Participation Rate

June 20th, 2016 9:47 pm

Via WSJ:

As Low-Skilled Jobs Disappear, Men Drop Out of the Workforce

White House study looks at the causes of falling participation rates among men

 ENLARGE
U.S. manufacturing employment is about 37% below its 1979 peak. The loss of factory jobs may be one reason men have been dropping out of the labor force.

Why aren’t men in the prime of their lives working more?

Working-age males have been sitting on the sidelines in greater numbers for decades, a trend that accelerated during the latest recession and has broad implications for individual well-being as well as the overall economy.

A new White House study highlights the sharpest decline among men with lower levels of educational attainment and concludes much of the cause is a loss of economic opportunity for those would-be workers.

“No single factor can fully explain this decline, but analysis suggests that a reduction in the demand for less skilled labor has been a key cause of declining participation rates as well as lower wages for less skilled workers,” the Council of Economic Advisers said in the report.

Labor-force participation among men between the ages 25 to 54 topped out at 97.9% in 1954. For about five decades, it has been heading steadily lower, punctuated by steeper falls during recessions. That’s a troubling phenomenon for individuals who should be at their peak, improving prospects for themselves and their families and contributing to the economy.

Participation appears to have stabilized but it’s still below levels at the end of the recession despite years of steady job creation, falling unemployment rates and signs of a tighter labor market.

The root causes have puzzled economists and pushed politicians to assign blame to everything from government programs such as disability insurance and international trade to immigration and simple demographics.

The White House study zeros in on the sharp divergence in participation rates by educational attainment and ethnicity. In the mid-1960s, participation figures nearly matched for those with a college degree and those with a high school degree or less. Last year, the rate for college-educated men was 94%, while the rate for men with at most a high-school diploma was 83%. The rate also has declined most steeply for black men.

Some working men may opt to retire early, go to school or take care of their families. But that’s likely only a small slice of the group. Less than a quarter of prime-age men who aren’t in the workforce have a working spouse.

The White House also dismisses government benefits as a major cause. Social Security Disability Insurance “can explain at most 0.5 percentage point of the decline over this period,” and more than one-third of the men not in the labor force lived in poverty, the CEA study said.

“In contrast, reductions in the demand for labor, especially for lower-skilled men, appear to be an important component of the decline in prime-age male labor force participation,” the report said.

Possible causes include the disappearance of factory jobs,  men’s falling educational attainment relative to women and a big rise in incarceration rates. A criminal record limits opportunities once an individual exits the criminal justice system. To be sure, the U.S. correctional population has been slowly declining in recent years–it’s fallen by an annual average of 1% since 2007, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

White House economists also note relatively low male participation rates compared with other developed economies. A lack of government support helping match or train the unemployed for jobs may be to blame.

“Absent policy changes, this long-standing decline could continue, as more Baby Boomers move into retirement, and as younger cohorts enter the labor force at lower rates,” the CEA said.

More on This Week’s Supply

June 20th, 2016 10:46 am

Via Gennadiy Goldberg at TDSecurities:

US Rates Strategy – Treasury Auction Preview

PDF: https://www.tdsresearch.com/currency-rates/viewEmailFile.action?eKey=I7TOL9E71WKNFWEODS171LPWB

Treasury will auction $88bn of nominal coupons this week, selling $26bn in 2s today, $34bn in 5s on Tuesday, and $28bn in 7s on Wednesday. With $80.3bn of holdings maturing at month-end, net cash raised at the sale will total just $7.7bn. There will also be $5bn in reopened 30yr TIPS and $13bn in reopened 2yr FRNs auctioned on Wednesday. SOMA holdings maturing at month-end will total $13.6bn, with the Fed adding on $3.8bn to 2s, $5.0bn to 5s, $4.1bn to 7s and $0.7bn to 30yr TIPS (for more on add-ons see here). The FRNs will not see any add-ons this month.

There is some uncertainty surrounding the auctions this week as investors continue to look toward Thursday’s EU Referendum for further direction. While recent polls suggest that the odds of a Remain win have increased, we believe the Treasury market will retain relatively cautious positioning ahead of the vote. Alongside a decline in rate hike pricing (investors are pricing in just 55% odds of a hike by December), ongoing uncertainty over the EU Referendum is likely to prove a positive for this week’s auctions. It nevertheless remains to be seen whether the recent increase in foreign buyer participation, which fueled May auction strength, will continue this month.

2s: The May auction saw extremely strong results – stopping 2.5bp through the screens as foreign investors took 27% of the auction and funds took 44%. While lower yields are likely to make investors more cautious, the recent pricing out of rate hikes and UK Referendum uncertainty are likely to fuel demand. Averages suggest a stop 0.7bp through the screens and 68% buy side award (49% to indirects and 19% to directs), and we generally expect a decent auction.

5s: The recent rally in 5s and their relative richening on the curve suggests that investors may require further concessions to buy at auction. Averages suggest a modest 0.3bp tail as only 4 of the past 12 auctions have stopped through 1pm levels. Averages similarly hint at a 69% buy side award as indirects get 60% and directs get 9%.

7s: The past two 7yr auctions have stopped through the screens, but auctions have seen much more mixed results over the past year. Averages hint at a small 0.2bp tail and 75% buy side award (60% to indirects and 15% to directs).

Gennadiy Goldberg

Two Year Note Auction

June 20th, 2016 10:37 am

Via Ian Lyngen at CRT Capital:

The 2-year sector is trading lower this morning and pricing in a reasonable outright concession, although it is outperforming on the curve. The improving odds that the UK votes to remain in the EU on Thursday has triggered a risk-on move that has been to the determent of Treasuries – but the bulk of the impact has been further out the curve with 10s and 30s particularly hard hit.  We’re optimistic about the prospects for this afternoon’s auction and anticipate a modest stop-through.  The strong reception to May’s auction saw a sizeable 2.5 bp stop-through, but that had the rare benefit of a huge direct award driven by the ‘other’ category which took $2.96 bn — presumably the GSEs.  The WI at 73+ bp suggests the lowest yielding new 2s since September – a characteristic that might sideline some investors.  There are very high maturities to offset this week’s supply at $80.3 bn, leaving the net new cash needed at just $7.7 bn – lowest for this trio since the reintroduction of the 7-year.  Somewhat troubling is the fact volumes have been below average this morning with 2s at 80% of the auction-day norm and with a below-average 10% marketshare vs. 14% norm.

• Recent 2-year auctions have seen mixed receptions – with two of the last four auctions tailing an average of 0.12 bp vs. two stopped-throughs that averaged 1.6 bp.

• On average foreign accounts have been taking more of 2s at $5.7 bn or 22% at the last four auctions vs. $5.2 bn or 20% prior.

• Direct bidding has increased to 18% at the last four auctions vs. 17% prior. Over the same period investment fund allocations have been higher at 42% or $10.9 bn vs. 35% or $9.2 bn of the prior four.

• Technicals are hinting of a reversal from overbought conditions. Stochastics have curled after dipping decidedly into overbought territory and are suggesting a more significant near-term correction is likely.  For initial support we like the high yield-mark of 74.1 bp from last week as well as volumes at 76 bp and then the 40-day moving-average at 79.1 bp.  We’re also tracking the 21-day MA at 80.1 bp.  For initial resistance we have an unfilled gap from Monday morning at 69.3 bp to 71.7 bp and then the 9-day moving-average at 72.0 bp as well as the Bollinger-bottom of 62.9 bp.

FX

June 20th, 2016 8:26 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman:

The Week Ahead is All about Europe

  • German Constitutional Court decision on OMT
  • EMU flash PMI
  • UK Referendum
  • TLTRO II

Market participants reacted enthusiastically to confirmation of that what suspected at the end of last week.  The murder of UK MP Cox served as an inflection point in the markets.  Investors are in a risk-on mood, with equities marching higher, the dollar and yen under pressure, and core bond yields are rising.  The Nikkei and the MSCI Asia-Pacific index gapped higher and  the Dow Jones Stoxx 600 is up 3%.  Sterling, which had been traded to almost $1.40 on June 16 is almost 2% today near $1.4630.  The euro reached a high near $1.1380 in the Asian session before easing back toward $1.1330 in the European morning.  The yen is the only major currency to lose ground to the greenback today.   Emerging market currencies are broadly higher except to the Indian rupee.  Investors were disappointed with news that the head of the central bank will not have a second term.  The South African rand and Russian ruble lead the emerging market currencies higher.  The MSCI emerging market equity index is up 1.4% today.  

The Chair of the Federal Reserve testifies before Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday.  Given the recent FOMC meeting and Yellen’s press conference, it is unlikely new ground will be broken. It is difficult for the market to price out a July hike more than it already has done. 

The August Fed funds futures contract, which offers the clearest read on the July 26-27 FOMC meeting, has two of a possible 25 bp hike (which is the same as a 12.5% chance).  It is still early in the month, and there is not much data for this month.  What data there is has not been particularly encouraging.  Weekly jobless claims are relatively elevated.  The Philly Fed June survey showed deterioration of the labor market and the Empire State manufacturing survey’s diffusion index was at zero, suggesting that the number of firms increasing and decreasing their workforces was the same.

Instead of US-centric drivers, the week ahead is the most important of the year and dominated by events in Europe.   Of course, the UK referendum on June 23 is the big event that has sent ripples through the global capital markets.  It is still not clear how the murder of UK MP Jo Cox is going to impact the vote.  The first poll fully conducted after Cox’s death found a shift toward remaining in the EU.  

The Survation telephone poll on June 18-19 for the Mail found 45% favor remain and 42% want to leave.  This is a reversal of Survation’s previous poll.  Separately, a YouGov poll for the Sunday Times of which a 2/3 was conducted after Cox’s assassination, showed 44% want to remain part of the EU and 43% want to leave.   

The betting has edged in favor or remain and so have the event markets.  The bookmakers have widened the odds of Brexit.  At the peak last week, one had to wager 47 cents (to win $1) at PredictIt for Brexit.  Now an exit wager can be made for 32 cents.  

Regardless of the outcome, participant must be prepared for a dramatic reaction in the markets.  In the futures market, the net speculative positioning has changed very little over the last couple of weeks (short almost 37k futures contracts), but the size of the gross long and short positions have increased by roughly 30k contracts since the end of last month.   

There are nearly 400 local vote counting centers.  The polls are open until 10:00 BST (5 pm EST). Although early market reaction is often faded, what may not be widely realized, but some large pools of capital are believed to be paying for their own private exit polls.  This is important.  This private information gives an obvious edge.  A sense of the official results, even if not 100%, will likely be known between 3-5 am BST, which is late-Thursday night in NY,  where many market participants are expected to be manning their phones/computers.    It is understood that the central banks will provide extra liquidity for the markets as needed.

It is not clear that a vote to remain in the EU will avoid a political crisis in the UK.  The Tory Party has been torn asunder.  The future of UKIP is not clear.  The Labour Party is not in a particularly strong position to push for advantage.    

Many think that a UK vote to leave could precipitate a broader crisis in the EU, and especially EMU. European leaders are cognizant of this and some sort of new initiative could be forthcoming. Some more integrated security and defense area activities are perhaps relatively low hanging political fruit.  There seems to be less recognition that the EU will negotiate any divorce under the harshest of terms to avoid the dissolution of other marriages.  What some said of Grexit would by political necessity (and not because of a particular personality) is applicable for Brexit.   

It is important to keep in mind that the UK is a member of the WTO, which comes with reciprocal rights and responsibilities.  However, the WTO is not comprehensive.  It is stronger on trade in goods, for which the UK runs a trade deficit.  It is weaker, and therefore the trade is more vulnerable, on services, which the UK runs a surplus.  The UK remains a member of the United Nations, and has a veto in the Security Council.  However, many other agreements that the UK is engaged are a function of being the in European Union.  

The optimists talk about a two-year negotiating process.  The pessimists warn of a much longer process.  In any event, Brexit would not necessarily trigger an immediate drop in economic activity as some of the scar-tactic claimed.  Rather it would likely be more like a debilitating illness.  It would impact decisions about the future, like staffing, investment, expansion, etc.  However, the market for capital adjusts quicker, and, of course, can have an impact on the real economy.  

Reports indicate, for example, in the week ending June 15, $1.1 bln of UK equities were liquidated by global investors, which is the second highest weekly outflow recorded.  It was the eighth week of net sales.  Lipper estimates that the assets under management of the UK fund industry has fallen by a GBP200 bln to GBP900 bln over the past twelve months.  Outflows from the equities have been recorded in eight of the past nine months, while outflows from UK strategic bond funds has not missed a month.    Apparently, some of savings have been drawn to the absolute return funds.  Under what conditions will they return?  It suggests that volatility will likely remain elevated for a bit longer, even if not as high as seen recently.   

Two days before the UK referendum, on June 21 the German Constitutional Court will hand down its decision on whether the Bundesbank’s participation in the ECB’s Outright Market Transactions would violate the German constitution.  The European Court of Justice, who the German court initially deferred issues of whether OMT violates EU law or the ECB’s mandate, ruled in the central bank’s favor.  

Although OMT has been largely superseded by QE, if the German Court finds that it violates German law, it could trigger a crisis.  Such a decision would expose a fundamental contradiction between German law and EU law.  It would reinvigorate efforts to challenge the (German) constitutionality of QE’s sovereign and corporate bond purchases.   Without putting too fine of a point on it, such a decision would open a can of worms which could very well overwhelm the capabilities of the current political leadership given their respective domestic challenges.  

We brought this to your attention before the weekend.  It does not appear on many economic calendars.  There may be only a low probability that the German court reads the German constitution in such a way that challenges what Germany and the Bundesbank can do in the EU in such a direct way.  However, it is precisely these kind of low probability high risk events that investors need to be aware. 

As the UK goes to the polls, the eurozone will report flash June PMI readings.   The ECB has acknowledged, and market economists appear to agree, the eurozone economy is slowing from the heady 0.6% growth in Q1.  Growth in Q2 looks to be closer to 0.4%, which for the euro area is close to trend growth.   The periphery appears to be slowing more than the core.  This means that the risk is for the final PMI to be lower than the flash reading.  

As the markets respond on June 24 to the results of the UK referendum, the ECB will announce the outcome of the first leg of its second round to Targeted Long-Term Repo Operations.  The key issue is the size of the take-down or participation.   However, the challenge will be to separate the new demand from the rolling over of existing borrowings under previous TLTRO programs.  There is an estimated 423 bln euros of outstanding TLTRO borrowings.    

The real new demand is expected to be minimal, even if the headline is in the 300-400 bln euro range.  At first TLTRO is September 2014, 82 bln euros was borrowed, a small fraction of what was on tap.  The issue behind the weak lending figures in the eurozone is not that rates are high or that the banks lack sufficient funds or proper incentives.  To the extent that demand is sluggish, more and cheaper funds are not the solution.  

The success of the program cannot be simply measured by the amount of new funds provided. The ECB says that its evaluation will focus on improvement of financial conditions, not on size.  The TLTRO program can serve a backstop for banks, insuring that sufficient funds are available if needed. In addition, for those banks that doe participate, the possibility of securing funds as cheap as minus 40 bp compensates the banks for the charge on extra reserves.  Peripheral banks, especially in Italy and Spain, are expected to be the biggest participants.  

Global investors expressed their disappointment with news over the weekend that the Governor of India’s central bank Rajan will step down at the end of his term in early September.  The rupee is the worst performing currency today. It is the only emerging market currency to have fallen against the dollar today.  It is off 0.5%.  There were some reports of suspected intervention that help the rupee recoup nearly half of its intrday losses.  

There have been indications over the last couple of weeks that Rajan might do this, and it has weighed on the currency and bonds.  Rajan’s tight monetary policy has come under criticism of some key government officials.  There also have been reports of Rajan’s desire to leave and return to academia. Since the start of June when such reports began circulating, through the end of last week,  the rupee’s 0.25% gain is among the least in emerging markets.  It is better than only the pegged Hong Kong dollar (0.15%), the Chinese yuan (-0.02%), and the Mexican peso (-2%).   Indian stocks have fared alright in the sense that they are little changed, while the MSCI Asia Pacific Index is off nearly 1.5% so far this month and the MSCI Emerging Market equity index is off around 0.25%.   India’s benchmark 10-year bond yield has risen three basis points this month, while most yields are lower.  

 

Some Corporate Bond Stuff

June 20th, 2016 5:59 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Trading Lowest in Weeks, Issuance Lowest Since Feb.
2016-06-20 09:36:37.710 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Secondary IG trading ended with a Trace
count of $9.7b Friday, the lowest since Memorial Day, vs $14.9b
Thursday, $10.7b the previous Friday. 10-DMA $13.9b; 10-Friday
moving avg $11.7b.

* 144a trading added $1.4b of IG volume Friday vs $2.8b
Thursday, $1.7b last Friday

* The most active issues longer than 2 years:
* BRAC 2.75% 2019 was 1st with client and affiliae flows
accounting for 100% of volume; selling twice buying
* ECACN 3.90% 2021 was next with client and affiliate
flows taking 100% of volume; client selling 2x buying
* CDK 4.50% 2024 was 3rd with client trades taking 96% of
volume
* CADEPO 4.40% 2019 was most active 144a issue with client
flows taking 100% of volume

* Bloomberg US IG Corporate Bond Index OAS at 161.1 vs 161.9
* 2016 high/low: 220.8, a new wide since Jan. 2012/150.8
* 2015 high/low: 182.1/129.6
* 2014 high/low: 144.7/102.3

* BofAML IG Master Index at +160 vs +161
* 2016 high/low: +221, the widest level since June
2012/+152
* 2015 high/low: +180/+129
* 2014 high/low: +151/+106, tightest spread since July
2007

* Standard & Poor’s Global Fixed Income Research IG Index at
+205 vs +206
* +262, the new wide going back to 2013, was seen
2/11/2016
* The widest spread recorded was +578 in Dec. 2008

* S&P HY spread at +655 vs +664; +947 seen Feb. 11 was the
widest spread since Oct. 2011
* All time wide was +1,754 in Dec. 2008

* Markit CDX.IG.26 5Y Index at 82.8, unchanged
* 73.0, its lowest level since August, was seen April 20
* 124.7, a new wide since June 2012 was seen Feb. 11
* 2014 high/low was 76.1/55.0, the low for 2014 and the
lowest level since Oct 2007

* Current market levels
* 2Y 0.740%
* 10Y 1.661%
* Dow futures +198
* Oil $48.74
* ¥en 104.52

* No IG issuance Friday vs just $375m Thursday, $1.795b
Wednesday, $2.05b Tuesday; June stands at $60.13bb
* U.S. IG BONDWRAP: Weekly Volume Fails to Break Double-Digits
* YTD IG issuance now $863b; YTD sans SAS $720b

Regarding Negative Interest Rate Carnage

June 20th, 2016 5:55 am

Via Tracy Alloway at Bloomberg:

Jun 20, 2016

Negative Rates Are the Tools of Our Elderly Oppressors
A “pattern of intergenerational conflict” sparked by ultra-low returns, according to Citigroup.
Tracy Alloway

June 20, 2016 — 5:17 AM EDT

Here is a diagram of things disliked by the young and the old, that may or may not reveal more about this Bloomberg writer’s psyche than about the actual state of the world. Still, few would argue that the negative interest rates imposed by a handful of central banks around the world have failed to endear themselves either to an older generation increasingly composed of savers or to their children, who seem doomed to make up the shortfall in the older generation’s low returns.

 

The latter point is highlighted by Citigroup Inc. Chief Economist Willem Buiter, who parses the deleterious effects of sub-zero benchmark interest rates on pension funds, life insurers, and, yes, intergenerational harmony in a research note published on Monday.While negative rates wreak havoc on old people’s savings and pension plans, they can be even more problematic for young people who are left holding the bag of unsustainably generous benefit plans amid sluggish economic growth and newly-created austerity drives, he says.

“There is no painless solution to the problems created by the decline in the neutral real interest rate and the associated decline in risk-adjusted expected rates of return. Someone will be worse off than expected, hoped for or promised,” says the economist. He notes that a portfolio with a 4.5 percent target rate of return carries with it the same risk for an asset manager in Europe or Japan as a portfolio with a target eight percent return did before the financial crisis.

With low rates eating into portfolios, retirees are left with few options to maintain their expected standards of life after ending work. They can invest in riskier assets (a potentially unpalatable decision given the need to preserve capital in one’s later years), resume employment (ugh), accept a lower standard of living (aaarghh) or find a sucker to fund the shortfall.

 

That sucker is increasingly the younger generation under pressure to fund the excesses of its predecessors while arguably lacking the benefits that they once enjoyed. Moreover, they are up against a demographic block which vastly eclipses them in terms of sheer electoral power; “Increasingly the old are ‘outvoting’ the young. Austerity aimed at maintaining or restoring government solvency in the euro area has disproportionally hit the young,” writes Buiter.

Few would argue that the solution to geriatric economics is for central banks to raise rates — that risks prompting a recession and curtailing economic growth to everyone’s disadvantage — but neither can the shifting burden of negative rates and lower returns be ignored.

“Savers – the old – are likely to recoup their losses due to negative interest rates from younger generations,” concludes Buiter. “We are likely to see a continuation of this pattern of intergenerational conflict as the old gear up to defend their standard of living in the face of secularly low rates of return on saving. It seems questionable that Wordsworth would have said of the decade to come that ‘Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, But to be young was very heaven.'”