“A Regulatory Artifact”

August 15th, 2016 11:32 am

Via Bloomberg:

Libor Surge Is Part of Regulatory ‘Head-On Collision’: Wrightson
2016-08-15 15:06:21.216 GMT

By Alexandra Harris
(Bloomberg) — Recent Libor spike isn’t about a “shortage
of dollars per se,” but a lack of a “particular kind of
dollar-denominated asset,” Wrightson ICAP economist Lou
Crandall said in note.

* 100bp spread between 12-mo. Libor and 12-mo. bills isn’t a
“credit-risk phenomenon. It’s a regulatory artifact”
* On lender side, institutional prime funds are
“dramatically” shortening their weighted avg maturities
amid “huge uncertainties” about potential outflows before
Oct. 14 money fund reform deadline
* Borrowers, like banks, need longer-maturing assets to
comply with liquidity regulations
* Libor jump reflects maturity gap instead of currency
mismatch, which explains why there’s been little
participation at central banks’ short-term USD funding
auctions
* Related story: ECB taps Fed’s FX swap line for $575m for
week ended Aug. 10
* “Additional one-week cash won’t help anyone meet their
funding bogeys”
* Central banks could extend length of dollar loans to a
maturity that would “actually make a difference,” yet
haven’t done so as they tend to shy away from providing “ad
hoc liquidity fixes”
* Purpose of post-crisis regulatory framework is to ensure
banks can navigate a “turbulent liquidity environment”
without “extraordinary interventions from authorities”

Russia and Saudi Arabia Talking

August 15th, 2016 8:05 am

Via Reuters:

Russia, the world’s top oil producer, is consulting with Saudi Arabia and other producers to achieve oil market stability, Energy Minister Alexander Novak said, adding that the door is still open for more discussions on freezing output levels if needed.

In an interview published on Monday Novak also told Saudi-owned newspaper Asharq al-Awsat that a complete return of market stability is only likely in 2017.

“With regard to the cooperation with Saudi Arabia, the dialogue between our two countries is developing in a tangible way, whether in the framework of a multi-party structure or on a bilateral level,” Novak was quoted as saying.

“We are cooperating in the framework of consultations regarding the oil market with OPEC countries and producers from outside the organisation, and are determined to continue dialogue to achieve market stability,” he said.

“We are ready to achieve the widest possible level of coordination… and put in place joint measures to achieve oil market stability, with the condition that these measures will not be for a limited period of time.”

Novak’s comments come only days after Saudi Arabian Energy Minister Khalid al-Falih said his country would work with OPEC and non-OPEC members to help stabilise oil markets.

An informal meeting of major producing countries is scheduled in Algeria late next month.

Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) will meet on the sidelines of the International Energy Forum (IEF), which groups producers and consumers, in Algeria from Sept. 26-28.

Oil prices extended gains after Falih’s remarks on Thursday, which indicated that Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s largest producer, is worried that oil prices could fall towards $40 per barrel or lower due to oversupply.

Talks on a global oil production level freeze collapsed in April. OPEC member Iran has been the main opponent of a freeze as it looks to raise its output to levels seen before the imposition of now-ended Western sanctions.

 

Bank of japan Dominates Equity Market

August 15th, 2016 7:37 am

Via Bloomberg:
The Bank of Japan’s Unstoppable Rise to Shareholder No. 1
Anna Kitanaka
onlyanna100
Yuji Nakamura
ynakamura56
Toshiro Hasegawa
August 14, 2016 — 11:00 AM EDT
Updated on August 15, 2016 — 4:08 AM EDT

BOJ set to become top owner of 55 firms in the Nikkei 225
Japan’s central bank boosted its ETF buying program last month

l

The Bank of Japan’s controversial march to the top of shareholder rankings in the world’s third-largest equity market is picking up pace.

Already a top-five owner of 81 companies in Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Average, the BOJ is on course to become the No. 1 shareholder in 55 of those firms by the end of next year, according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg from the central bank’s exchange-traded fund holdings. BOJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda almost doubled his annual ETF buying target last month, adding to an unprecedented campaign to revitalize Japan’s stagnant economy.

While bulls have cheered the tailwind from BOJ purchases, opponents say the central bank is artificially inflating equity valuations and undercutting efforts to make public companies more efficient. Traders worry that the monetary authority’s outsized presence will make some shares harder to buy and sell, a phenomenon that led to convulsions in Japan’s government bond market this year.

“Only in Japan does the central bank show its face in the stock market this much,” said Masahiro Ichikawa, a Tokyo-based senior strategist at Sumitomo Mitsui Asset Management Co., which oversees about 12 trillion yen ($118 billion). “Investors are asking whether this is really right.”

While the BOJ doesn’t acquire individual shares directly, it’s the ultimate buyer of stakes purchased through ETFs. Estimates of the central bank’s underlying holdings can be gleaned from the BOJ’s public records, regulatory filings by companies and ETF managers, and statistics from the Investment Trusts Association of Japan. Forecasts of the BOJ’s future shareholder rankings assume that other major investors keep their positions stable and that policy makers maintain the historical composition of their purchases.

 

The central bank’s influence on Japanese stocks already rivals that of the biggest traders, often called “whales” in the industry jargon. It’s the No. 1 shareholder in piano maker Yamaha Corp., Bloomberg estimates show, after its ownership stake via ETFs climbed to about 5.9 percent.

The BOJ is set to become the top holder of about five other Nikkei 225 companies by year-end, after boosting its annual ETF buying target to 6 trillion yen last month. By 2017, the central bank will rank No. 1 in about a quarter of the index’s members, including Olympus Corp., the world’s biggest maker of endoscopes; Fanuc Corp., the largest producer of industrial robots; and Advantest Corp., one of the top manufacturers of semiconductor-testing devices.

Fanuc views the BOJ in the same way it does any other shareholder, a company spokesperson wrote in an e-mailed response to questions from Bloomberg News. Spokesmen at Fast Retailing and Yamaha declined to comment. Advantest and Olympus couldn’t be reached as their offices were closed for Japan’s Obon holiday.

A central bank spokesman, who asked not to be named citing BOJ policy, said the ETF purchases will help officials reach their 2 percent inflation target as soon as possible. Consumer prices fell 0.4 percent in June from a year earlier, the fourth straight month of declines.

Kuroda has argued that ETF purchases will help spur economic activity and inflation by boosting risk appetite in Japan. After the BOJ’s last meeting on July 29, he said the central bank has room to increase buying if needed. The monetary authority’s estimated 8.9 trillion yen of ETF holdings at the end of June amounted to less than 2 percent of Japan’s total stock-market capitalization.
Unconventional Policy

While the BOJ has pushed unconventional monetary easing further than peers, its market intervention is hardly unique. The Bank of England unveiled a $13 billion plan to purchase corporate debt on Aug. 4, less than two months after the start of a similar program at the European Central Bank. During the Asian financial crisis in 1998, Hong Kong bought local shares to defend its currency peg, helping to fuel a rally that allowed it to dispose of the stake within five years.

For Takashi Aoki, a fund manager at Mizuho Asset Management, the ETF program’s downsides aren’t substantial enough to justify removing it from the BOJ’s toolkit.

“The goal is to get Japanese companies making money again, and to reach 2 percent inflation,” said Aoki, whose firm oversees about $50 billion. “The scope of the BOJ’s buying is what’s needed to reach that target. It’s effective.”
Disappearing Float

So far, there’s little evidence that the BOJ’s purchases are disrupting the smooth functioning of Japan’s stock market, according to Keiichi Ito, the chief quantitative analyst at SMBC Nikko Securities Inc. But that could change as the buying increases, Ito said, particularly for stocks with low free float, or shares available for trading.

The free float at Fast Retailing Co., whose top weighting in the Nikkei 225 makes it a major recipient of BOJ money, is about 25 percent of shares outstanding. The BOJ owns about half the company’s free float now, a proportion that will rise to 63 percent by year-end, according to Nomura Holdings Inc., Japan’s biggest brokerage.

BOJ purchases could soak up the remaining free float at companies including Comsys Holdings Corp. and Tokyo Electron Ltd. over the next year, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

“It’s going to become hard to trade,” Ito said. “Stocks that have a low free-float ratio will become very volatile.”

Japan’s government bond market offers a guide to the risks of further intervention in stocks, said Akihiro Murakami, the chief quantitative strategist for Japan at Nomura in Tokyo. JGB volatility soared to the highest level since 1999 in April, while trading volume has slumped as the central bank’s holdings swelled to about a third of the market. It’s still buying at an annual rate of 80 trillion yen.

“If the BOJ does not sell stocks, then liquidity will disappear,” Murakami said. “As liquidity falls, the number of shares you can buy starts to decline — the same thing that’s happening in the JGB market.”

The central bank owned about 60 percent of Japan’s domestic ETFs at the end of June, according to Investment Trusts Association figures, BOJ disclosures and data compiled by Bloomberg. Based on a report released on Friday by the Investment Trusts Association, that figure rose to about 62 percent in July.

The monetary authority spreads purchases across funds that mimic Japan’s most popular indexes — the Nikkei 225 and Topix — along with the JPX-Nikkei Index 400, which is meant to showcase the nation’s shareholder-friendly companies. A smaller slice of its budget goes to ETFs tracking firms that boost wages and capital expenditure.

The Nikkei 225 slid 0.3 percent on Monday, bringing this year’s drop to 11 percent.

While there’s no sign that the central bank will use its holdings to influence how Japan’s public companies are managed, some investors worry that BOJ purchases could give a free ride to poorly-run firms and crowd out shareholders who would otherwise push for better corporate governance. The BOJ isn’t explicitly subject to Japan’s stewardship code for institutional investors, designed to encourage stockholders to push companies for better performance.

“The BOJ being a stable shareholder of such a large ratio of stocks is going to make investors question if governance is being held to account, and the debate around this is going to get more aggressive as they increase holdings,” Sumitomo Mitsui’s Ichikawa said. “People are going to question how long the BOJ should keep this policy going.”

Less Flowing Through Credit Pipeline This Week

August 15th, 2016 7:32 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT PIPELINE: Issuance May Slow From Recent Torrid Pace
2016-08-15 09:30:37.65 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Dealers expect IG issuance to slow this week
from the pace that has brought August issuance to near $100b in
just 2 weeks. Expect closer to $20b vs last week’s $45b.

LATEST UPDATES

* Israel Electric (ISRELE) Baa2/BBB-; said to hire C, JPM for
at least $500m bond sale in 4Q

MANDATES/MEETINGS

* Sumitomo Life (SUMILF) A3/BBB+; investor mtg July 19
* Woori Bank (WOORIB) A2/A-; mtgs July 11-20

M&A-RELATED

* Analog Devices (ADI) A3/BBB; ~$13.2b Linear Technology acq
* To raise nearly $7.3b debt for deal (July 26)
* Bayer (BAYNGR) A3/A-; said to review Monsanto (MON) A3/BBB+
accounts as bid weighed (Aug. 4)
* $63b financing said secured w/ $20b-$30b bonds seen
* Danone (BNFP) Baa1/BBB+; ~$12.1b WhiteWave (WWAV) Ba2/BB
* Co. Says deal 100% debt-financed, expects to keep IG
profile (July 7)
* Thermo Fisher (TMO) Baa3/BBB; ~$4.07b FEI acq
* $6.5b loans, including $2b bridge (July 4)
* Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) Baa3/BBB; ~$1b LDR acq
* Plans $750m issuance post-completion (June 7)
* Air Liquide (AIFP) A3/A-; ~$13.2b Airgas acq
* Plans to refi $12b loan backing acq via USD/EUR debt
(June 3)
* Great Plains Energy (GXP) Baa2/BBB+; ~$12.1b Westar acq
* $8b committed debt secured for deal (May 31)
* Abbott (ABT) A2/A+; ~$5.7b St. Jude buy, ~$3.1b Alere buy
* $17.2b bridge loan commitment (April 28)
* Sherwin-Williams (SHW) A2/A; ~$9.3b Valspar buy
* $8.3b debt financing expected (March 20)
* Shire (SHPLN) Baa3/BBB-; ~$35.5b Baxalta buy
* Closed $18b Baxalta acq loan (Feb 11)

SHELF FILINGS

* IBM (IBM) Aa3/AA-; automatic mixed shelf (July 26)
* Nike (NKE) A1/AA-; automatic debt shelf (July 21)
* Potash Corp (POT) A3/BBB+; debt shelf; last issued March
2015 (June 29)
* Tesla Motors (TSLA); automatic debt, common stk shelf (May
18)
* Debt may convert to common stk
* Reynolds American (RAI) Baa3/BBB filed automatic debt shelf;
sold $9b last June (May 13)
* Statoil (STLNO) Aa3/A+; debt shelf; last issued USD Nov.
2014 (May 9)
* Corporate Office (OFC) Baa3/BBB-; debt shelf (April 12)
* Rogers (RCICN) Baa1/BBB+; $4b debt shelf (March 4)

OTHER

* Visa (V) A1/A+; CFO says will issue $2b debt for buybacks by
yr end (July 21)
* Saudi Arabia (SAUDI); said to have hired 6 banks to lead
first intl bond sale (July 14)
* Investment Corp of Dubai (INVCOR); weighs bond sale (July 4)
* Alcoa (AA) Ba1/BBB-; upstream entity to borrow $1b (June 29)
* GE (GE) A3/AA-; may issue despite no deals this yr (June 1)
* Discovery Communications (DISCA) Baa3/BBB-; may revisit bond
market this yr, BI says (May 18)
* American Express (AXP) A3/BBB+; plans ~$3b-$7b term debt
issuance (April)

Some Corporate Bond Stuff

August 15th, 2016 7:31 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Volume Led by Client Flows in AT&T Long Bonds
2016-08-15 09:38:48.853 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Secondary IG trading ended with a Trace
count of $10.3b Friday vs $14.6b Thursday, $12.6b last Friday.
10-DMA $14.6b; 10-Friday moving avg $11b.

* 144a trading added $1.7b of IG volume Friday vs $2.1b
Thursday, $1.6b last Friday

* The most active issues:
* T 6.30% 2038 was 1st with client flows accounting for
100% of volume; client buying 3:2 vs selling
* T 6.00% 2040 was next with client selling taking 100% of
volume
* MSFT 1.10% 2019 was 3rd with client flows taking 95% of
volume
* INTNED 2.625% 2022 was most active 144a issue with client
and affiliate flows taking 100% of volume; client buying
twice selling

* Bloomberg US IG Corporate Bond Index OAS at 146.0 vs 145.3,
the low for 2016
* 2016 high/low: 220.8, a new wide since Jan. 2012/145.3
* 2015 high/low: 182.1/129.6
* 2014 high/low: 144.7/102.3

* BofAML IG Master Index at +145, unchanged from the new low
of 2016
* 2016 high/low: +221, the widest level since June
2012/+145
* 2015 high/low: +180/+129
* 2014 high/low: +151/+106, tightest spread since July
2007

* Standard & Poor’s Global Fixed Income Research IG Index at
+200 vs +189
* +262, the new wide going back to 2013, was seen
2/11/2016
* The widest spread recorded was +578 in Dec. 2008

* S&P HY spread at +587 vs +584; +947 seen Feb. 11 was the
widest spread since Oct. 2011
* All-time wide was +1,754 in Dec. 2008

* Markit CDX.IG.26 5Y Index at 71.7 vs 71.3
* 2016 high/low 124.7/70
* 124.7, a new wide since June 2012 was seen 2/11/2016
* 2014 high/low was 76.1/55.0, the low for 2014 and the
lowest level since Oct 2007

* Current market levels vs early Friday:
* 2Y 0.694% vs 0.730%
* 10Y 1.498% vs 1.537%
* Dow futures +31 vs +13
* Oil $44.77 vs $43.50
* ¥en 100.93 vs 102.06

* SMR Money Manager Survey (Aug. 10):
* Client allocations to corporate bonds jump to new record
high of 37% vs 36.8% the previous week
* “Corporate allocations have averaged 36.0% so far this
year, ranging from 35.5% to 37.0%”
* “Over the past five years, Corporate allocations have
averaged 34.3% of assets, ranging from 32.0% to 37.0%”
* This survey started at the all time low of 19% in August
1999

* U.S. IG BONDWRAP: Over $40b Priced on Week; August Nears
$100b
* August volume $96.5b; YTD Volume $1.12t

FX

August 15th, 2016 7:29 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman:

Drivers for the Week Ahead

  • The week began with the first estimate of Japan’s Q2 GDP
  • Sterling is the weakest of the majors this year; CPI, retail sales, labor market data will be reported
  • Soft employment data ahead and RBA minutes warn that the risk of AUD appreciation can encourage further profit-taking after the recent run-up
  • ECB releases its account of the last meeting; judging from Draghi’s post-meeting press conference, not much of interest was discussed
  • The US releases a slew of data in the week ahead; we continue to see risks of asymmetrical responses
  • The FOMC minutes from last month’s meeting will be released
  • EM officials are showing more concerns about FX strength, but the global liquidity outlook for now favors EM and “risk”

The dollar is mixed against the majors.  The yen and dollar bloc are outperforming while sterling and the Scandies are underperforming.  EM currencies are broadly firmer.  RUB and MXN are outperforming while CNY and PLN are underperforming.  MSCI Asia Pacific was down 0.1%, with the Nikkei falling 0.3%.  MSCI EM is up 0.3%, continuing a string of eight straight up days, with Chinese markets rising 3%.  Euro Stoxx 600 is up 0.1% near midday, while S&P futures are pointing to a flat open.  The 10-year UST yield is down 1 bp at 1.51%.  Commodity prices are mostly higher, with oil up 0.3%, copper flat, and gold up 0.3%.  

Japan’s Q2 GDP:  The week began with the first estimate of Japan’s Q2 GDP.  It was stagnant vs. expectations of 0.2-0.3% q/q seasonally adjusted.  Consumption slowed to 0.2% and business spending continued to contract at -0.4%.  The GDP deflator, another measure of prices, eased to 0.8% from 0.9% (year-over-year).  It represents a new two-year low.  The softer deflator and weaker growth will increase the perceived pressure on the BOJ to provide additional stimulus.  

Japan’s July Trade Balance:  Since 2011, Japan has been running trade deficits.  That has changed this year.  It is sustaining a surplus.  Japanese trade figures continue to be highly seasonal.  Just like June is regularly an improvement over May, the July balance typically worsens sequentially.  This has been the case over the past four years and in seven of the past nine.  The median forecast is for a JPY234.5 bln surplus, down from JPY692.8 bln in June.  In July 2015, Japan reported a JPY261.39 bln deficit.  The swing from deficit to surplus masks an ominous development.  Exports are expected to have fallen nearly 14% from a year ago, while imports around a fifth less.  According to the OECD’s PPP model, the yen is currently almost 4% over-valued.  In the middle of last year, it was 20% under-valued.  For comparison, under the OECD’s model, the euro is nearly 17% undervalued.  

UK Data:   The yen is the strongest of the major currencies this year, appreciating by 18.7% as of the end of last week.  Sterling is the weakest of the majors.  It has lost nearly an eighth of its value this year.  For structural reasons, there is a relatively quick pass through of currency movement into domestic prices.  Sterling’s decline will boost measured prices.  A small increase can be expected in July, but CPI will likely accelerate in the coming months.  The UK also reports July retail sales figures.  We suspect there is downside risk to the Bloomberg survey median forecast for a 0.3% increase after CBI retail sales survey and the fall in consumer confidence.   The employment data will likely be only of passing interest for investors.  It is for June, and wages are through May.  It simply plants the flag, so to speak, for comparison purposes.  

BOE QE:  On the second day of its six-month bond buying program, the BOE failed to secure as many intermediate bonds as it planned by about 5%.  We flagged it immediately but think that many jumped to the wrong conclusion.  It is not a sign of the failure of the program.  It is a minor technical glitch.  What is the goal of the renewed asset purchases?  To ensure that the transmission mechanism of monetary policy works.  A key metric of this is lower interest rates.  The fact that the reverse auction was uncovered pushed yields down further.  If the BOE fails to buy enough bonds, it is not a bearish sign (for prices) of the failure of an activist central bank, but a bullish sign that it will have to pay more to implement its asset buying program.  Similarly, sterling’s decline is not problematic for UK officials.  It will also help cushion the domestic economic shock.  Except of course in the immediate aftermath of the referendum, sterling’s decline has been orderly, and not undesirable.  The pass-through into domestic price levels will be seen as a one-off.  It seems fairly clear that the BOE will look through it, which means that it won’t stand in the way of additional easing.  

ECB Meeting Account:  The ECB has only recently begun offering a written report of its policy meetings.  They are reluctant to call them minutes, like other central banks, but it serves the same function on many levels.  It is a channel of policy communication.  The Bank of England, which more recently than other major central banks secured its independence, sets the bar of timeliness and transparency by releasing the minutes at the conclusion of the policy meeting.  Judging from Draghi’s post-meeting press conference, not much of interest was discussed.  It has been clear that the ECB had entered a “watch and wait” mode as it implemented its new TLTRO and corporate bond buying program.  New staff forecasts will be available in next month.  A cut in growth and inflation forecasts in the wake of the UK referendum may allow Draghi to win support to extend the bond-buying program another six months (to September 2017).  

Another related issue is the capital key, which is the algorithm that determines how much of each countries bonds are to be purchased.  The capital key ensures that large countries, like Germany and French bonds, are favored over smaller countries.  However, due in part to the fact that Germany is paid to borrow money, but insists on not only running a balanced budget but paying down its debt, there is some concern about a looming shortage.  We continue to believe that the capital key will be difficult to eschew and that some alternatives may be preferable if necessary.  

European Banks:  The stress tests results were announced two weeks ago.  Since then, the Euro Stoxx 600 bank index has risen in seven of the past 10 sessions for a net gain of 3.2%. Italian banks have been at the epicenter of concerns.  Bank shares finished last week by extending their recovery for the seventh consecutive sessions.  However, over the past two weeks, the index of bank shares is still off 2.2%.  

Germany’s Elections:  The US presidential election is much discussed, and Italian Prime Minister Renzi’s threat/promise to resign if the constitutional referendum is rejected is widely recognized.  Spain may be finally moving to the formation of a government, after going to the polls twice, though it is has not prevented investors from pushing the 10-year Spanish yield below the 1.0% threshold for the first time recently.  Few have yet to appreciate the approaching German state elections (Mecklenburg-Vorpommem–MV–on September 4 and Berlin a fortnight later).  The last election in MV was in 2011, and it produced a Grand Coalition government led by the SPD (35.6%) and the CDU (23%).  There has been a Grand Coalition since 2006.  Although the AfD has been wracked by internal strife, it may still benefit from in the current political climate.  

Chancellor Merkel and Finance Minister Schaeuble will campaign in MV in the coming days.  Merkel’s popularity has suffered in the wake of violence associated with refugees, and the state elections will be seen, at least in part, as a referendum on the Chancellor.  US presidential candidate Trump is not the only one who thinks that Merkel will not be re-elected as Chancellor next year.  Many others have expressed this concern.  We note that there has yet to be the emergence of a compelling alternative, and Merkel’s adversaries have often underestimated her political savvy.  

Australian Data:  The Australian dollar finished last week with the first two consecutive declines against the dollar in almost two months.  Soft employment data in the week ahead and RBA minutes that warn of the risk of currency appreciation can encourage further profit-taking after the recent run-up was that was undeterred by the rate cut earlier this month.   One reason that may help explain the Australian dollar’s resilience in the face of lower rates is that it still is the highest yielding reserve currency, and it is a AAA credit to boot.  With Stevens retiring in the middle of next month, Deputy Governor Lowe will take over.  There is a sense of great continuity with the RBA’s reaction function.  

US Data:  The disappointing July retail sales did not derail expectations that the soft patch of three-quarters of sub-2% growth is ending, even though it (coupled with inventory, trade and construction data) warns of downward revisions to Q2’s estimate.  The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker was shaved to 3.5% from 3.8% after the favorable employment report.  The NY Fed trimmed its estimate to 2.4% from 2.6%.  The US releases a slew of data in the week ahead.  We continue to see an asymmetrical response, where the market reactions stronger to disappointing data than better data.  The economic reports are unlikely to change the general views of the economy or the expectations for the September FOMC meeting.  The industrial sector continues to recover from its earlier weakness, while price pressures remain stable.  

The core CPI is likely to remain steady at 2.3%.  We see risk on the upside of both the core rate and headline rate following the PPI report before the weekend.  Embedded in the weaker than expected PPI report was news that the measure of health-care costs rose 0.3% (before seasonal adjustments).  It is the most since last October.  It feeds into the core PCE deflator.  Perhaps the most important data will come from NY and Philadelphia, where the manufacturing surveys should boost confidence of the economic rebound here in Q3.  

Federal Reserve:  After raising interest rates last December, the Federal Reserve has not found what it regards to be an appropriate opportunity to continue to normalize monetary policy.  The FOMC minutes from last month’s meeting will be released.  The minutes give a broad impression of views and concerns.  Voters and non-voters are treated equally.  The Governors and regional Presidents are indistinguishable.  Yet, time after time, policy is shown to emanate from the Fed’s leadership.  This may make NY Fed Dudley’s press briefing, which will include Q&A on August 18, the day after the minutes are released, more revealing than the minutes themselves.   We expect Dudley to express current caution but not rule out a rate hike this year.  

The September dot plot most likely anticipate one hike this year rather than two as in June or four as in last December.  While there is precedent for a September move in an election year, there is no precedent for a November hike, and nearly everyone recognizes that.  At the end of last week, though, according to Bloomberg, the Fed funds futures were implying a 16% chance that the Fed funds target will be 50-75 bp in September and a 17.5% chance in November (?). There is a little better than a one in three chance of that (50-75 bp) being the target in December discounted by the current pricing of the futures strip.

EM FX ended the week on a soft note, despite the weaker than expected US retail sales report.  It is starting this week off firm.  Official concern about strong exchange rates is beginning to emerge.  First it was Korea, then on Friday it was Brazil as acting President Temer said his country needs to maintain a balanced exchange rate, neither too weak nor too strong.  We expect more pushback to emerge if the current rally is extended.  Still, the global liquidity outlook for now favors EM and “risk.”

Looking at individual country risk, Brazil’s central bank is likely to continue selling reverse FX swaps to help limit BRL gains.  In Russia, renewed tensions with Ukraine could continue weighing on the ruble.  Turkey may get downgraded by Fitch, while higher than expected inflation data in India may derail the bond rally there.

Valuation Problem

August 15th, 2016 2:42 am

Via WSJ:

Lower your sights.

The U.S. stock market’s trifecta of record index values last week, its first since 1999, comes with a glaring warning that isn’t getting as much attention as it deserves: rising valuations. This has important implications not only for individual investors but also public pension funds that base their health on investment targets. They look absurdly optimistic.

While pricey valuations don’t necessarily mean the market is poised to drop, they do suggest that the already yawning gap in public accounts is understated to the tune of perhaps hundreds of billions of dollars. Taxpayers and owners of municipal bonds that could be left on the hook should take heed.

Price/earnings ratios are volatile, but consider the more stable long-term valuation indicator popularized by Nobel Prize winning economist Robert Shiller. His metric, the cyclically adjusted price/earnings ratio, is based on the S&P 500’s current price divided by its average earnings over the past 10 years adjusted for inflation. It currently stands at 27.1, well above its long-term average of about 16.

Today’s valuation falls into the top tenth of historical observations, based on data since the 1880s. When the CAPE is in the top decile as it is now, the S&P 500 subsequently averages about 4% annually for the next 10 years. The upshot: While not a short-term market-timing tool, rich stock-market valuations often have led to the worst returns a decade later.

This is the conundrum facing pension funds, many of which already aren’t fully funded on existing assumptions. A typical 7.5% investment target is used to discount liabilities, so a lower number would mean a bigger gap. In a traditional portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, though, that looks nearly impossible to achieve, at least over the next decade.

For instance, a basket of 10-year Treasurys and corporate bonds yields roughly 1.75%. That means equities would have to return about 11.4% annually for pensions to meet their targets in the next 10 years. That far exceeds the average at times like these, when valuations are least favorable.

The power of positive thinking can only take investors and taxpayers only so far.

Write to Steven Russolillo at [email protected]

Collateral Damage

August 15th, 2016 2:39 am

Via Bloomberg:

Neil Callanan
ncallanan
August 15, 2016 — 2:05 AM EDT
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

U.K. pension-fund liabilities rose to a record $1.3 trillion
Younger workers will have to save more or work for longer

 

Britain’s millennials, already suffering for the economic mistakes of the past, now face the prospect of having to pay for the country’s future.

Pension-fund liabilities in the U.K. increased to a record 1 trillion pounds ($1.3 trillion) after the Bank of England’s interest-rate cut this month, hurt by quantitative easing and razor-thin yields. It’s Britain’s version of what Duquesne Family Office LLC Chairman Stanley Druckenmiller calls “Generational Theft” in the U.S.

Plunging bond yields have caused pension liabilities to balloon and it could get even worse because the BOE will probably reduce interest rates further this year, according to a survey of economists by Bloomberg. Deficits for defined-benefit-pension funds already rose by more than 40 percent in the two months through July, following the vote to leave the European Union and the central bank’s subsequent decision to increase quantitative easing, according to consulting firm Mercer.
‘Reluctant’ Savers

“The Bank of England clearly believes that the effect on our pension system is acceptable long-term collateral damage” to prevent a short-term recession, said David Blake, professor of pension economics at London’s Cass Business School. Younger workers will “have to save more — which they appear reluctant to do — or be prepared to work much longer.”

The increased bond-purchase program has had a relatively limited impact on pension deficits, according to the minutes of the BOE’s Monetary Policy Committee meeting on Aug. 3. While the fund managers have to move into riskier assets, that helps to support the economy, Governor Mark Carney said Aug. 4.

“That makes it less likely that we will have a very long period of high unemployment, low output, and very low interest rates,” Carney said. The BOE declined to comment further.

Money managers, however, appear to be unwilling to offload their higher-yielding gilts because they’re worried about generating enough returns to pay their members. The BOE last week failed to find enough investors who were prepared to sell their longer-maturity gilts, a slice of the credit market dominated by pensions and insurers.

Companies that run defined-benefit pension funds are also starting to worry. Postal-service operator Royal Mail Plc said last week it may not be able to keep its program running beyond 2018. That’s because its annual contributions could more than double to over 900 million pounds.
‘Toxic Combination’

“The growing pressures from a slump in U.K. yields will be an increasingly prevalent discussion around the boardroom table of many corporates,” Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Jonathan Tyce and Arjun Bowry said in a report last month. “The toxic combination of falling interest rates and rising longevity has more than tripled the aggregate deficit,” they wrote, citing data from pension consultant Hymans Robertson.

As many as 1,000 defined-benefit plans are at serious risk of insolvency in the U.K., meaning they may not be able to pay members’ pensions in full, the Pensions Institute and Cass Business School said in a December report. The deficit at the U.K. plans is estimated to have risen about 73 percent to 408 billion pounds in the 12 months through July, according to the Pension Protection Fund, which compensates workers when companies become insolvent and have a shortfall in their defined-benefit plans.

The protection fund “may need to adopt facets of its American cousin, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., to address growing pension deficits,” Tyce and Bowry wrote in a note on Wednesday. “These include the ability to claim up to 30 percent of a business’s net worth and to proactively engage early with weaker employers directly.”

The U.K. and Europe also face a wider pension problem: an aging population will have fewer workers to fund state pensions, which may mean higher taxes for employees. Last year, there were four workers for every person aged 65 or more in the European Union. By 2050, there’ll be just two, according to Eurostat estimates.

 

Many of the defined-benefit pensions in the U.K. are now closed. That means millennials, who are generally defined as being 35 or younger, will have to rely on their own savings for retirement, while also facing record-high house prices and rising unemployment. The jobless rate for 16 to 24-year-olds was 13.5 percent in May, compared with 4.9 percent for the wider population, according to government statistics.

Young workers “face more risk and expense in providing for their own pensions, both now and in future,” said former pensions minister Ros Altmann. “Their employer will also have less cash flow available to pay into younger workers’ pensions because of the added and unbudgeted burdens resulting from the increase in defined-benefit-scheme funding.”

Early FX

August 15th, 2016 2:36 am

Via Kit Juckes at SocGen:

<http://www.sgmarkets.com/r/?id=h11261799,18005029,1800502a&p1=136122&p2=4b388736d5e32309403d6db6b85e1f35>

A perfect Monday morning in London…… It will be hotter later but get up and out…

Friday’s US retail sales report is more volatile and less reliable than the labour market data that were released a week earlier, but the data were weak and the market mood has shifted once again. The odds of a 2016 rate hike have eased back to 42% as we await the next round of US housing, and inflation data, and the FOMC Minutes for the last meeting. The FX market is likely to bounce around with the data but for now, it’s in a sweet spot – fading fear of a Fed hike, and every reason in the world to look for higher yields elsewhere, even if the Brazilian real’s drop after acting president Michel Temer expressed concern about its strength is a reminder that there are limits to dollar weakness.

% chance of Fed rate hike in 2016

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/230897/1]

Separately, last week also saw Q2 productivity data which prompted much handwringing about ‘new normal’ ‘secular stagnation’ and softer potential growth. Official productivity is down 0.5% y/y, and has now averaged barely above ½% in the last 5 years. That’s a long way shy of the 2.6 rate of productivity growth that was seen between 2000 and mid-2008 and it points to a potential growth rate that is around 1 ½% per annum. Mind you, as the chart shows, the productivity data correlate nicely with the difference between non-farm payrolls and GDP, so I’m not completely sure why we should ever be surprised by them. In the last 12 months, GDP growth has come in ½% below employment growth.

US productivity’s down in the dumps – but then you know that…

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/230897/2]

Watching sentiment regarding the Fed outlook will keep us pretty busy all week. But we’ll also get a lot of data in the UK, the highest profile of which are CPI figures Tuesday and unemployment data on Wednesday. This morning’s Rightmove house price data were soft at -1.2% m/m, 4.1% y/y, (but it’s August…).The Sterling story doesn’t change much. Relative rates are pointing towards more weakness and the data aren’t likely to be bullish. The CFTC positioning data for last week meanwhile show speculative traders with a net 90,000 contract short position, considerable worse than at any time in recent years, including the Great Financial Crisis. No point over-thinking, Sterling is prone to short-covering but is also trending lower over time.

CFTC sterling shorts at new extremes

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/230897/3]

Overnight, Japan’s Q2 GDP came ion marginally above flat on the quarter at a 0.2% annualised rate, but at least industrial production bounced by 2.3% m/m (-1,5% y/y). There’s a dearth of data today and the Feast of the Assumption keeps some markets shut. Oil prices are slightly higher, equity prices mixed, bond yields (very) firmly anchored after Friday’s data. Not many new ideas on offer. EM, oil-sensitive and higher-yielding currencies are supported, sterling less so. Not much out there to drag vol up, either.

 

Saint Louis Fed Casts Aspersions on Stimulus Spending

August 13th, 2016 8:49 pm

Via the Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis:

Tuesday, August 09, 2016

By William Dupor, Assistant Vice President and Economist

The most recent U.S. expansion, however lackluster, entered its eighth year in June.1 In anticipation of the possibility (or perhaps inevitability) of another recession, observers have remarked on how and whether countercyclical fiscal policy should be used to combat an economic downturn.

In response to the last recession, the federal government undertook a large fiscal stimulus, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). When all was said and done, the act cost $2,760 per capita, making it the largest program of its kind since the New Deal of the 1930s. It increased the U.S. federal debt by $840 billion.

Gauging Effects through Military Spending

Research Analyst Rodrigo Guerrero and I took up the issue of the efficacy of government spending at increasing employment. We looked specifically at over 120 years of U.S. military spending, which provides a kind of “natural experiment” for our analysis.

Looking at government spending more generally suffers from the problem that the spending may be correlated with economic activity: The government may spend more during a recession (as with ARRA) or more during an expansion (when tax revenues are high). This might bias the results, which economists call “an endogeneity bias.”

Military spending, on the other hand, is likely to be determined primarily by international geopolitical factors rather than the nation’s business cycle. Specifically, we used a dataset developed in pioneering work by Valerie Ramey and, on several of the papers, her co-authors Michael Owyang and Sarah Zubairy.2

The Effects of Stimulus on Employment

To control for potential “anticipation effects,” Owyang, Ramey and Zubairy used historical documents to construct a time series of military spending news shocks. This allowed them to disentangle the time of military spending from when the public learned that military spending was going to change in the future. Those authors looked at the output response to the spending shocks. They found a small effect of military spending on output and that the size of this effect did not depend on whether the economy was slack or not.3 Specifically, a $1 increase in government spending caused a less than $1 increase in gross domestic product (GDP).

We used a similar methodology and found that military spending shocks had a small effect on civilian employment. Following a policy change that began when the unemployment rate was high, if government spending increased by 1 percent of GDP, then total employment increased by between 0 percent and 0.15 percent. Following a policy change that began when the unemployment rate was low, the effect on employment was even smaller.

In the event of another recession, policymakers have a number of stabilization tools at their disposal, including quantitative easing, negative interest rates and tax relief. The research discussed above suggests that one other device, namely countercyclical government spending, may not be very effective, even when the economy is slack.

Notes and References

1 According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the trough of the last contraction occurred in June 2009.

2 Ramey and Zubairy are economics professors at the University of California-San Diego and Texas A&M, respectively. Owyang is an assistant vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Two of these papers using the long time series on military spending news are: Owyang, Michael T.; Ramey, Valerie; and Zubairy, Sarah. “Are Government Spending Multipliers Greater during Periods of Slack? Evidence from 20th Century Historical Data,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 2013, Vol. 103, Issue 3, pp. 129-34; and Ramey, Valerie; and Zubairy, Sarah. “Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from U.S. Historical Data,” Working Paper, 2016.

3 In one study, those authors found that the output effect of government spending in Canada tended to be higher when the unemployment rate was high.