FX

November 28th, 2016 6:48 am

Via Kit Juckes at SocGen:

FX daily link below, mostly thoughts on EUR/USD after the French Republican Primary and ahead of the Italian referendum this weekend. The broader theme is month-end position-lightening, which is correcting some over-bought USD positions. A glance at a chart of USD/JPY and its 9-day RSI (relative strength index) tells the story well enough for me. The yen fell too fast, needs to slow down and sort itself out. The USD/JPY 9-day RSI reached levels a week ago that we haven’t seen since late 2014, and once these correct, they tend to get back into mid-range before the currency corrections ends. Which is another way of saying that this correction will probably go further and tells me nothing about the underlying trends at all, in FX, Bonds, equities, or anything else…..                                                                                                                                                            <http://www.sgmarkets.com/r/?id=h11da5c82,1925f499,1925f49a&p1=136122&p2=b9b11ec1a8d1a4fb4791bb42302dff75>

Last week’s move in bond yields took the Treasury/Bund spread (210bp this morning after a bit of a Treasury pull-back) to levels not seen since May1989. That month also saw EUR/USD (in the form of USD/DEM rebased) slide temporarily back under parity. There have been some very long periods when EUR/USD had little or nothing to do with yield differentials but most of the time, they are a reasonable gauge.

EUR/USD and 10year yields spreads – back to May 1989

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/237025/1]

In 2015-2016, real yield differentials correlate better than nominal ones and in the last few weeks the Euro has under-performed these as the trend in peripheral spread in European bond markets has once again become important. Which gives the EUR/USD story three separate sub-plots this week. Firstly, the resounding victory of Francois Fillon in the second round of the French Republican Primary installs him as front-runner for the Presidential election next year, with polls suggesting he would win a second round run-off against Marine Le pen. That’s helping the Euro but the focus will now be on the independent candidates who may emerge, in particular Francois Bayrou from the centre-left. If he were to dilute the right-wing vote enough, and the left-wing were to field a credible candidate, M Fillon’s passage to a second round run-off wouldn’t be as clear cut as the polls currently suggest.

The second sub-plot is the Italian constitutional reform referendum this weekend. BTP/Bund spreads are close to their wides as the implications of a possible ‘no’ votes are debated. New elections are unlikely and the most recent opinion poll suggests only 15% of Italians want to leave the Euro, but the FT warns of the threat of a ‘no’ vote to Italian banks, and there are concerns about implications for the country’s credit rating, too. The third sub-plot is much more mundane but on Friday we can get back to the US labour market. We look for another 165k increase in non-farm-employment, a 4.8% unemployment rate and 2.8% wage growth. Consistent with a December rate hike but a familiar story all the same and one that leaves us thinking that well over 90% of the widening trend in Treasuries/Bunds is already behind us. Further EUR/USD weakness will be much more about European politics than the relative growth trends.

EUR short-covering depends on OATS and BTPS rallying

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/237025/3]

More generally, gauging how far month-end position-squaring can take the dollar isn’t a scientific process. We want to be long USD/JPY without getting run over in the squeeze, and take some comfort from the TOPIX’s achievement of another new high, but a glance at USD/JPY relative strength indicators suggests a deeper correction is very possible. Likewise, with Wednesday’s OPEC meeting looking, there will be nerves in the oil market and in oil-sensitive currencies, and probably a preference for non-oil commodity-related currencies.

FX

November 21st, 2016 6:26 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman:

Drivers for the Week Ahead

  • The news over the weekend is primarily political in nature
  • Investors see two trends which could very well portend a changing paradigm
  • The Federal Reserve was poised to hike rates next month regardless of the electoral outcome.
  • The Federal Reserve was poised to hike rates next month regardless of the electoral outcome
  • EM policymakers are getting more concerned about FX weakness; many EM central banks (Hungary, Malaysia, South Africa, Turkey, and Colombia) meet this week

The dollar is mostly weaker against the majors as the new week gets under way.  The Scandies are outperforming, while sterling and the Swiss franc are underperforming.  EM currencies are mostly firmer.  ZAR, MXN, and RUB are outperforming, while KRW, TRY, and CNY are underperforming.  MSCI Asia Pacific was up 0.4%, with the Nikkei rising 0.8%.  MSCI EM is up 0.2%, with Chinese markets rising 0.7%.  Euro Stoxx 600 is flat near midday, while S&P futures are pointing to a higher open.  The 10-year UST yield is down 3 bp at 2.33%.  Commodity prices are mostly higher, with oil up nearly 2%, copper up 2%, and gold up 0.6%.

The news over the weekend is primarily political in nature.  Sarkozy is going to retire (again) after taking a drubbing in the Republican Party primary in France.  Fillon, the self-styled French Thatcher, unexpectedly beat Juppe.  But without 50% of the vote, the results set up a run-off this coming weekend.  It is as if, knowing their candidate will likely face Le Pen in the final round next spring, the Republican Party might as well chose the most extreme laissez-faire candidate.  The so far uninspiring center-right Republicans will have to depend on the left’s antipathy toward the populist right to overcome the National Front’s challenge.  

In Germany, Merkel officially announced her candidacy for a fourth term as German Chancellor.  This was widely expected.  Merkel has moved to protect her flanks after her immigration policy caused a fissure in her alliance with Bavaria’s CSU.  The national election is planned for next fall.  The anti-immigration and anti-EU AfD party have come on strong to win representation in all but a few German states.  The most likely outcome is for a continuation of a grand coalition between the CDU and SPD.  It is possible that another party is needed to form a coalition government.  If so, the FDP are more likely than the Greens.  

In the UK, Chancellor of the Exchequer Hammond played down need to provide strong fiscal stimulus in this week’s Autumn Statement.  Separately, Prime Minister May’s op-ed piece in the Financial Times marks out a pro-business stance, including a corporate tax cut that will lower the UK rate to the lowest in the G20.  

Around the middle of the year, St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard revealed his new economic approach.  He argued that during economic phases, or paradigms, economic relationships were fairly stable, such as unemployment and inflation.  

We cannot predict when a new paradigm emerges.  Economic forecasts must assume the continuation of whatever is the current paradigm.  Bullard accepts the need for one more interest rate hike, perhaps next month, to bring the Fed funds to a neutral target within the existing set of economic relationships.  

Investors see two trends which could very well portend a changing paradigm.  First is reflation.  It was clear that whichever candidate won the US presidential election, fiscal policy was set to turn more accommodative.  Trump promised a large stimulus package, which included tax cuts as well as spending increases.  The size of the package he talked about during the campaign, and his economic advisers are maintaining after the election, is on par with the February 2009 measures when the economy was in the throes of the credit-crisis-induced recession.  

The limits of monetary policy were gradually becoming recognized and emphasized by economists and policymakers.  A few countries, such as Canada, led by a new Liberal government, provided modest fiscal support.  The UK is also widely expected to increase government spending.  Investors anticipate that Hammond, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, will outline an increase in infrastructure investment (rail and roads) in the Autumn Statement on November 23.  Trump’s campaign rhetoric stands out for its size and the fact that it is for a US economy that is already growing near trend, which the Federal Reserve estimates near 1.8%.  The inflationary implications of provided significant stimulus under such pre-existing conditions are not lost on investors.  

The other trend is toward nationalism and away from globalism, or integration.  The UK decision (by a slight majority) to leave the EU and the election of the populist-right Trump as US president (where he secured the necessary electoral college votes but did not win the most popular votes) are the first two steps on the trend, with the focus turning to Europe.  For various reasons, beyond the scope of this note, polls appear to have failed in capturing the strength of nationalism and support for populist-right positions.  

We have long argued Europe was a man-made construct more than a geographic entity defined by Nature.  Monetary union was similarly a political construct and was designed to cope with the reunification of Germany.  We were able to help navigate the troubled waters when many thought that a Greek exit was imminent by appreciating the significance of political considerations, including will.  The trend toward nationalism, if that is what it is, questions precisely that political will.  

The immediate focus is on the Italian referendum on the size and function of the Senate, and secondarily the Austria’s presidential election the same day, December 4.   Italian Prime Minister Renzi has pushed through reforms of the lower house, the Chamber of Deputies, earlier this year.  Next month’s referendum would complete the process and set the stage for the 2018 national elections.  However, the referendum is likely to lose.  Renzi overplayed the commitment to reform by threatening to resign if the referendum did not win.  He backed away from it, but most recently he has again played up this possibility.  

If the referendum loses, many expect Renzi to reshuffle his Cabinet.  Renzi seemed to be warning his critics within the governing PD party that he will not accept leading a caretaker government.  He would resign, he says.  A fractured PD, coupled with an already fragmented center/right, would increase the chances of the second largest political party, the anti-EU 5-Star Movement, which captured the city governments of Rome and Turin earlier this year.  

The economic or the political impulse in and of themselves may signal a new paradigm, but together, they are a potent force.  Despite significant purchases by the ECB and the BOJ, bond yields appear to have bottomed.  Deflationary forces in most countries have been arrested.  Bond yields have been falling since the early-1980s.  This trend may be over.  That is what is at stake.  We may have entered a new paradigm.  

The Federal Reserve was poised to hike rates next month regardless of the electoral outcome.  The recent string of data and official comments (including doves such as Governor Tarullo and Chicago President Evans) give the impression of a broad consensus to raise rates.  The upcoming high frequency data includes existing and new house sales, durable goods orders, and the preliminary trade balance.  They may be important for Q4 GDP estimates, but barring a significant downside surprise, investors are likely to continue to anticipate a hike in the Fed funds target rate next month.    

The minutes from the recent FOMC meeting have been superseded by events, and it will be difficult for the market to price in a much greater chance of a Fed hike.  The dollar has risen sharply this month, but it comes amid investor’s repricing the odds of a rate hike and political uncertainty.  While officials, like many investors, prefer less dramatic moves, the general direction may not be so disagreeable.  

The backing up of EMU bond yields, including more than 50 bp increase in the German 10-year yield since the end of September, may ease pressure on the ECB.  The nagging fear has been that the ECB’s self-imposed rules may lead to a shortage of some instruments can buy.  The ECB is expected to tweak these rules to ease the concern next month when a decision on whether and how to extend the asset purchases is expected.    

The flash eurozone PMI will not distract from the evolving political situation in Italy, Austria, and the implications of the rise in yields.  The rise in yields is seen a helpful for many banks.  The high-level concern about Deutsche Bank a few months ago has eased, and share prices have appreciated by more than 50% since the end September.  An index of EMU bank stocks initially rallied 10% after the US election, but has since given back around 60% of those gains.  In aggregate, European growth is near steady and near-trend, like the US, conceding that non-inflation growth is slower than in America.

Japan reports October trade and CPI.  Both exports and imports were weaker than expected, contracting -10.3% y/y and -16.5% y/y, respectively.  Exports have not risen on a year-over-year basis since September 2015.  Exports of autos, steel, and telecom equipment have been weak.  Exports to the US are off 11.2%, 9.5% lower to Europe, and falling 9.2% to China.  Recall that net exports contributed about 0.5% to Japan’s Q3 GDP.  CPI will be reported Friday.

Yet these are not the data or information that is driving the market.  It does not matter the precise print of CPI, the fact of the matter there is little new.  The headline rate may move back toward zero (from -0.5%), but this is the result of fresh food, which if excluded, is expected to be nearly steady (-0.4% from -0.5%).  Even when energy is excluded too, the year-over-year rate may rise to 0.1% from zero.  

The BOJ intervened last week in the local debt market to buy short-term securities to stabilize the market and resist the upward pressure being exerted by the rise in US rates.  Despite the negative yield environment, Japanese banks recently report strong earnings.  The rise in interest rates is seen as a favorable development among Japanese bank shares too.  The Topix bank index has risen about 27% over the past two weeks.  

Here in November, the Nikkei is the best performing major index.  It has risen a little more than 3%.  In fairness, the Dow Jones Industrial is up 4%, but the more representative S&P 500 is up 2.6%.  Foreign investors have been significant sellers of Japanese stocks this year and are unwinding short yen hedges.  The weekly data from the MOF suggests foreign investors may be returning.  Foreign investors bought JPY546 bln of Japanese shares in the week through November 11.  It is the third largest net purchases since July 2015.  Because of interest rate differentials and the supply and demand, one is still paid (the points work in favor of the hedger (when swapping yen for dollars).  

The macro forces we identified, reflation and nationalism that were expressed most clearly in the US election, but were evident before too, is spurring a dramatic shift in asset preferences.  The dollar, core equities, and financials are broadly in favor.  Bonds, emerging markets, gold, have broadly fallen out of favor.  

Of course, after rallying for ten consecutive sessions, the Dollar Index is stretched.  The euro has fallen for just as long of a streak.  The dollar has rallied more than 9% against the yen since the initial election reaction took it to JPY101.20.  It is not unusual for the dollar to appreciate as the pendulum of market sentiment swings more toward a Fed hike.  Interest rate differentials have moved further into the US favor, reaching levels not seen in years.  

Some consolidation in the capital markets should be expected, but that is not the underlying trend.  The paradigm shift is significant.  The second order effects that some observers are citing, like a larger budget deficit or current account deficit, or foreign investment being deterred by American nationalism, are important, but their time is not now.  They need to build and metastasize.  They will.

EM policymakers are getting more concerned about currency weakness.  Last week, Brazil, Malaysia, Korea, India, and Indonesia all took action to help support their currencies.  If the EM sell-off continues as we expect, more EM central banks are likely to act to slow the moves.

Several EM central banks (Hungary, Malaysia, South Africa, Turkey, and Colombia) meet this week.  Most are struggling with sluggish growth, but FX weakness is likely to keep all of them on hold for now.   

Some Corporate Bond Stuff

November 21st, 2016 6:23 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Mix of 10Y Issues Topped Most Active List
2016-11-21 10:51:02.685 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Secondary IG trading ended with a Trace
count of $15.6b Friday vs $20.1b Thursday.

* 144a trading added $3b of IG volume Friday vs $3.6b on
Thursday

* Trace most active issues longer than 2 years:
* NWL 4.20% 2026 was 1st with client selling 1.4x buying
* PEMEX 4.50% 2026 was next with client and affiliate
trades taking 98% of volume; client buying 4:3 over
selling
* HSBC 4.375% 2026 was 3rd; client and affiliate trades
took 88% of volume
* CPCHEM 3.40% 2026 was the most active 144a issue with client
buying 2.4x selling

* Bloomberg Barclays US IG Corporate Bond Index OAS at 130 vs
129; 128, a new low for the year and the lowest level since
May 2015, was seen Nov. 15
* 2016 wide/tight: 215 (a new wide since Jan. 2012)/128
* 2015 wide/tight: 171/122
* 2014 wide/tight: 137/97
* All time wide/tight back to 1989: 555 (Dec. 2008)/54
(March 1997)

* Current markets vs early Friday:
* 2Y 1.064% vs 1.035%
* 10Y 2.328% vs 2.331%
* DOW futures +12 vs -32
* Oil $46.40 vs $45.25
* ¥en 110.72 vs 110.39

* No IG issuance Friday vs $16.55b Thursday, the highest in 4
weeks, $9.75b Wednesday, $5.45b Tuesday, $10.9b Monday
* Weekly volume posts 4-week high
* November totals $57.8b; YTD $1.54T, up 8% y/y

Credit Pipeline

November 21st, 2016 6:21 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT PIPELINE: Holiday Week Means Less Volume Likely
2016-11-21 10:27:12.799 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — 84% of dealers and clients, in a Bloomberg
survey, expect IG issuance to be no greater than $15b this week.
Just 4% expect $25b or more. The difference in expectations may
be associated with one large M&A-related type deal.

LATEST UPDATES:

* Avnet (AVT) Baa3/BBB-, hired BAML/JPM for investor calls to
take place today; reported acquisition of majority stake in
Hackster Nov. 14
* Enbridge (ENBCN) Baa2/BBB+, hires Barc/DB/Miz/MUFG for
investor calls Nov. 16-17: has not issued since May 2014,
has $2.2b maturing in 2017
* Adani Ports (ADSEZ) Baa3/BBB-, holding investor meetings
from Nov. 13, via BAML/Barc/C/SCB; 144a/Reg-S deal may
follow
* Puget Sound Energy (PSD) A2/A-, filed an $800m debt shelf;
utilities often follow the close of the big industry
conference
* General Electric Co (GE) A1/AA-, to combine oil and gas
business with Baker Hughes (BHI) Baa1/A; GE to borrow $7.4b
of incremental leverage to fund the deal, co. said in
conference call
* Dow Chemical (DOW) Baa2/BBB, filed debt shelf; last issued
in Sept. 2014
* Qualcomm (QCOM) A1/A+; ~$47b NXP Semiconductor (NXPI)
Ba2/BBB-, acq
* Sees funding deal with cash, $11b new debt (Oct. 27)
* Rockwell Collins (COL) A3/A-, to buy B/E Aerospace (BEAV)
Ba2/BB+, for $8.3b in cash, stock, assumption of debt
* COL sees financing cash portion of deal with debt
financing; plans to pay down $1.5b of new debt by end of
its FY19
* Moody’s and S&P said COL’s rating may be cut to the mid-
BBB range following completion of the BEAV acquisition
* AT&T (T) Baa1/BBB+ to buy Time Warner (TWX) Baa2/BBB for
$85b in cash, stock deal; cash portion will be financed with
new debt, cash on hand
* $40b bridge loan in place
* T may be cut by Moody’s; any potential downgrade would
be limited to one notch
* European Stability Mechanism (ESM) Aa1/na/AAA, mandates
Barc/C/DB/JPM to advise on its USD issuance program
* First ESM USD transaction scheduled for 2H 2017, subject
to market conditions
* ConAgra (CAG) Baa2/BBB-, could borrow up to $2.5b for
acquisitions
* Province of Nova Scotia (NS Gov) Aa2/A+ , filed Friday a
$1.25b debt shelf; last issued in USD in 2010, has $500m
maturing January
* Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KOHNPW) Aa2/AA, mandates BNP/C
for investor meetings Oct. 18-20
* Hyundai Capital Services (HYUCAP) Baa1/A-, to hold investor
meetings from Oct.17, via C/HSBC/Nom
* Darden Restaurants (DRI) Baa3/BBB, filed debt shelf, last
seen in 2012
* Darden announced a new $500m share buyback program in
its 1Q earnings release
* Yes Bank (YESIN) Baa3/na, plans to raise $500m by year’s end
* Republic of Namibia (REPNAM) Baa3/BBB-, to hold non-deal
investor meetings Oct. 7-13, via Barc/JPM/StanBk
* Asciano (AIOAU) Baa3/BBB-, names ANZ/BNP/Miz for investor
meetings Oct. 10-28; it is a non-deal roadshow; last priced
a USD deal in 2011
* Western Union (WU) Baa2/BBB, filed debt shelf; last issued
Nov. 2013 following Oct. 2013 filing
* Nafin (NAFIN) A3/BBB+; mandates BofAML, HSBC for investor
meetings Sept. 27-28; USD-denominated deal may follow
* Analog Devices (ADI) A3/BBB; ~$13.1b Linear Technology acq
* $5b loan received after $11.6b bridge (Sept. 26)

MANDATES/MEETINGS

* Banco Inbursa (BINBUR) –/BBB+/BBB+; mtgs Sept. 7-12
* Woolworths (WOWAU) Baa2/BBB; investor call Sept. 7
* Sydney Airport (SYDAU) Baa2/BBB; investor calls Sept. 6-7
* Industrial Bank of Korea (INDKOR) Aa2/AA-; mtgs from Aug. 22
* Sumitomo Life (SUMILF) A3/BBB+; investor mtg July 19

M&A-RELATED

* Bayer (BAYNGR) A3/A-; ~$66b Monsanto acq
* Hybrid bond sales, approx. EU5b convertible bond
planned; part of $57b bridge (Sept. 14)
* Danaher (DHR) A2/A; ~$4b Cepheid acq
* Sees financing deal via cash, debt issuance (Sept. 6)
* Couche-Tard (ATDBCN) Baa2/BBB; ~$4.4b CST Brands acq
* Expects to sell USD bonds (Aug. 22)
* Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) Baa3/BBB; ~$1b LDR acq
* Plans $750m issuance post-completion (June 7)
* Great Plains Energy (GXP) Baa2/BBB+; ~$12.1b Westar acq
* $8b committed debt secured for deal (May 31)
* Sherwin-Williams (SHW) A2/A; ~$9.3b Valspar buy
* $8.3b debt financing expected (March 20)

SHELF FILINGS

* Starbucks (SBUX) A2/A-; debt shelf; has $400m maturing Dec.
5 (Sept. 15)
* Brunswick (BC) Baa3/BBB-; automatic mixed shelf; last issued
in 2013 (Sept. 6)

OTHER

* Israel Electric (ISRELE) Baa2/BBB-; said to hire C, JPM for
at least $500m bond sale in 4Q (Aug. 8)
* Visa (V) A1/A+; CFO says will issue $2b debt for buybacks by
yr end (July 21)

Viewing Bond Market Rout as Victory for Rentier Class

November 21st, 2016 4:43 am

Via Bloomberg:

  • Higher bond yields will boost funded ratios for pension funds
  • Low rates ‘just not right in today’s economy,’ BlackRock says

In the wake of Donald Trump’s victory, much has been made about the stunning selloff in the U.S. bond market.

Traders have described it as a bloodbath and a seismic shift. Some have even dubbed it a Trump tantrum, in a nod to the Fed-induced rout of 2013.

But for those that rely on fixed-income assets for what the name actually suggests — a fixed income over time — it couldn’t have come at a better time. Pension funds, which for years have struggled to keep up with their obligations as yields plumbed new lows, are now in line for a $100 billion reprieve as interest rates increase. Savers may finally see the interest they get from Treasuries rise after more than a decade of declines. And for banks, higher yields could also mean billions in extra income.

“Our investors have been waiting and waiting for a long time for this day to come,” said Kathy Jones, the chief fixed-income strategist at Charles Schwab & Co., which has $2.7 trillion in client assets. “If you’re long-term holder of bonds for income, then this rise in yields will be a good thing.”

After being largely left behind in the era of cheap money, savers may ultimately emerge as the big winners in a world where Trump is president. Yields on 30-year Treasury bonds have risen about a half-percentage point since the election to 3.02 percent as of 2:40 p.m. Monday in Tokyo, as Trump’s ambitious spending plans prompt traders to ratchet up their expectations for inflation and growth.

There’s no sugarcoating the move, as the surge in yields resulted in losses of 8 percent in just 10 days. But the silver lining for investors focused on long-term income (rather than short-term returns) is that, when it comes to bonds, any selloff paves the way for higher future returns.

Diminishing Returns

That’s especially important as yields have all but vanished after central banks such as the Federal Reserve implemented easy-money policies and dropped interest rates to rock-bottom levels. Since 2007, the income that investors get on interest payments from Treasuries has fallen from an average of 5.1 percent to just 1.86 percent this year, data from Bank of America Corp. show.

Historically, interest has been the key component of bond performance. From 1986 through 2008, prices of Treasuries have fallen 11 times over the course of a year. Yet only twice, in 1994 and 1999, did investors end up losing money, because the higher rates outweighed the decline in value. In the post-crisis era of ultra-low yields, that’s changed. In the four years prices fell since 2009, Treasuries have twice posted negative total returns.

“We’ve lived in this world of historically low interest rates,” said Rick Rieder, chief investment officer of global fixed income at BlackRock Inc., which oversees $5.1 trillion as the world’s biggest money manager. “If rates actually move up, you could create a better economic paradigm.”

U.S. companies that oversee $3 trillion in pension assets would be among the biggest winners. A half-percentage point increase in yields in the last two months of the year would cut future liabilities of the 100 largest defined-benefit plans by $109 billion, according to an estimate by Milliman Inc., a pension advisory firm.

In an ideal world, the plans could exactly offset their promises to retirees with bonds of matching maturities. But as yields fell, they turned to stocks to make up the difference. As funded ratios improve, they’ll rotate back to buying bonds, said Zorast Wadia, a principal at Milliman.

“We’re a large, long-term investor, so generally less opportunistic — we think yields now are closer to fair value,” said Anastasia Titarchuk, deputy chief investment officer at the New York State Common Retirement Fund, which manages $185 billion. “Higher yields should benefit all pension funds.”

Many individuals feel the same way. Take Mary Lee Wegner, a 55-year-old lawyer who lives in Sherman Oaks, California. She says higher rates will help boost the income of her 90-year-old mother, who has her life savings in certificates of deposits. One-year deposits, which provided interest of about 5 percent a decade ago, now pay just 1.2 percent, according to Bankrate.com.

Depression Era

“My parents were from the Depression era, so I was always taught to save,” Wegner said. “It would be nice if my cushion was actually making a little bit of interest instead of sitting around making nothing.”

It’s not just savers. Bank executives, who have seen their profits squeezed as yields have fallen, may now get a long-awaited bump as the gap widens between what they pay on deposits and what they earn on investments. Known as net interest income, it makes up on average about 65 percent of banks’ revenue, according to Marty Mosby, an analyst at Vining Sparks, a brokerage that specializes in financial institutions.

In a third-quarter call with journalists last month, Paul Donofrio, Bank of America’s chief financial officer, said a percentage-point increase in yields across all maturities would lift the lender’s net interest income by $5.3 billion in the next 12 months.

“Banks probably benefit the most,” Mosby said. “Rates got to a point where banks couldn’t really make any money off them. Being able to re-create the spread on deposits as rates move higher is really important.”

How High?

How high can interest rates climb? DoubleLine Capital’s Jeffrey Gundlach, one of the few in the bond market to predict a Trump victory, said he wouldn’t be surprised to see yields on 10-year Treasuries reach 6 percent within four or five years as inflation outpaces economic growth. That may seem impossibly high for some, but it’s actually about the average over the past 35 years.

Though he remains an outlier, 10-year yields have already risen a percentage point since falling to an all-time low of 1.318 percent in July. And Trump’s policies may encourage rates to head even higher.

“When rates pop up really fast like this, people who have some cash may want to start to put some money to work” buying longer-term bonds, said Schwab’s Jones. And “we think rates will rise further.”

Trump’s Advisors Policy Divide

November 21st, 2016 4:36 am

Via WSJ:

Donald Trump’s economic team splits neatly into two major groups over a fundamental question: Would the economy benefit most from more carrots or more sticks?

Mr. Trump captured the presidency with a small coterie of advisers whose public views diverge sharply on several fronts, most vividly on trade policy, which the president-elect made a centerpiece of his campaign. Personnel decisions over coming weeks will reveal which side prevails.

One group, which appeared ascendant in the closing weeks of the campaign, largely rejects mainstream economic thinking on trade and believes eliminating trade deficits should be an overarching goal of U.S. policy. That camp views sticks—tariffs on U.S. trading partners and taxes on companies that move jobs abroad—as critical tools to reverse a 15-year slide in incomes for middle-class Americans.

The opposing camp is closer to the traditional GOP center of gravity on taxes and regulation and includes many policy veterans staffing the transition team and advising Vice President-elect Mike Pence.

Those advisers have long championed supply-side economics and reject the hard-line position on trade that one side’s gain must come at the other’s expense. By offering more carrots—slashing red tape and taxes to make the U.S. the top destination for businesses—they say stronger growth would obviate any need for trade protectionism.

“It is the supply-siders versus the zero-sum crowd,” said Andy Laperriere, political strategist at research firm Cornerstone Macro LP who closely watches such policy developments.

A third group of advisers are mostly business associates of Mr. Trump’s who aren’t particularly ideological.

The question is in which direction Mr. Trump will go. The coming weeks of White House staffing and policy briefs have taken on even greater importance to markets and industry because Mr. Trump hasn’t held elective office, honed a consistent political ideology or cultivated a bench of trusted advisers. His campaign didn’t issue the types of detailed policy papers typical of past presidential runs.

Mr. Trump has blamed bad trade deals for the loss of U.S. jobs and promised to renegotiate and potentially quit the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico, calling it the worst trade deal “maybe ever signed anywhere.” He called the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership, completed last year but not yet approved by the U.S., a “continuing rape of our country.”

As Indiana governor, Mr. Pence had supported the TPP but reversed his support for the pact and earlier free-trade agreements after Mr. Trump tapped him to join the ticket.

David Malpass, the economist handling the economic portfolio for the transition effort, declined to comment. Other advisers have dismissed talk of strains. “What we’re seeing is a very orderly group of people working on behalf of the American people,” said Anthony Scaramucci, a member of the transition team executive committee who manages hedge-fund firm SkyBridge Capital, to reporters in New York on Thursday.

Key appointments extend not only to cabinet-level positions at the Treasury and Commerce departments but also to possibly more influential roles such as director of the National Economic Council and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

Those picks could shape the extent to which Mr. Trump governs as a more traditional Republican focused on cutting taxes and regulation or as an antiestablishment populist who pushes ahead with more tariffs and taxes on companies that outsource jobs.

So far, broad agreement between the two camps of advisers over the necessity of reducing taxes and regulations have allowed them—and the broader GOP—to paper over the bigger disagreements on trade. “There will be a balancing act,” said Stephen Moore, a top economic adviser during the campaign on taxes who disagrees with Mr. Trump on trade. “There’s going to be some disagreements even within the administration about what should be the priority…I don’t know how that will all come down.”

Advisers in both camps say Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.)—a longtime proponent of tighter trade and immigration rules—has emerged as the most influential adviser to Mr. Trump on the economy. Mr. Trump said Friday he would nominate Mr. Sessions as attorney general. The Republican senator’s former senior aide, Stephen Miller, became Mr. Trump’s national policy director.

In the final weeks of the campaign, Mr. Trump’s speeches reflected the view of advisers who share a deep skepticism of trade deals, including economist Peter Navarro, financier Wilbur Ross and steel executive Dan DiMicco, all of whom are being considered for top posts in the new administration.

Mr. Navarro, a professor at the University of California, Irvine, has written several books sharply critical of China’s trade and labor practices, including his 2008 publication, “The Coming China Wars,” and his 2015 book, “Crouching Tiger; What China’s Militarism Means for the World.”.

Mr. Navarro learned from a television interview that Mr. Trump was a fan of his writing, and the two struck up a correspondence several years ago. Mr. Navarro became an adviser to the campaign earlier this year, though he and Mr. Trump hadn’t met in person until September.

Mr. Laperriere said markets aren’t taking seriously enough Mr. Trump’s tough talk on trade, in which he equates trade deficits with theft. While the White House needs Congress to approve tax cuts, Mr. Trump has wide authority to change trade policy unilaterally.

On a range of other policy issues, Mr. Trump sounds as if his position “could easily evolve,” Mr. Laperriere said. “By contrast, his convictions on trade appear strong.”

Lawrence Kudlow, the CNBC commentator who advised Mr. Trump earlier this year on taxes, criticized using the trade deficit as a scorecard for whether the U.S. is winning or losing from trade. “Peter Navarro, a friend, is just wrong,” he wrote on Twitter before the election. Trade deficits, he added, simply reflect capital inflows and not forgone economic gains.

Mr. Kudlow also implored the campaign to tamp down the tariff talk. By following through with tax relief for large and small businesses, “these companies won’t leave in the first place,” Mr. Kudlow told Mr. Pence in a radio interview before the election.

“My response,” replied Mr. Pence, “is you’re exactly right.”

Write to Nick Timiraos at [email protected]

Early FX

November 21st, 2016 4:19 am

Via Kit Juckes at SocGen:

<http://www.sgmarkets.com/r/?id=h11d058a1,1915471b,1915471c&p1=136122&p2=748b21c8d1a1d161f0a9a83b74e0f013>
The first round of the French Republican Party primaries saw Nicolas Sarkozy knocked out and Francois Fillon go into the second round with Alain Juppe after getting 44% of the vote. That will leave him firm favourite, not just for his party’s nomination but also for the Presidential Election in April/May. The European open has seen a wave of Euro short-covering but how far that can go is doubtful. The clearest message I received over the last two weeks was that opinion polls and historical voting patterns which suggest a le Pen victory is unlikely, won’t do much to ease pre-election nervousness. Market participants can see the shift in the voter mood and the sharp swing in support for M Fillon can be seen as yet another surprise for opinion pollsters. Uncertainty will weigh on the Euro for months to come. Meanwhile, the final opinion polls before the deck 4 constitutional reform referendum in Italy, show the ‘No’ side in the lead.

EUR/USD – finally, a short-covering bounce?

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/236665/1]

With Thanksgiving on Thursday, this will be a reduced week, which may be a recipe for short-covering. But if the euro does bounce, I’d rather be long EUR/JPY or EUR/GBP than EUR/USD. Asian equities are up this morning and a quiet week would not seem a likely backdrop for a yen bounce. With relative yields and the global risk mood bother favouring yen weakness, EUR/JPY can have a short-term rally, and indeed, in the faraway future when the French elections are behind us, long EUR/JPY looks like a very attractive long-term long trade.

Stay long USD/JPY

[http://email.sgresearch.com/Content/PublicationPicture/236665/2]

Wednesday’s Autumn Statement in the UK doesn’t look set to see much fiscal largesse as the Chancellor gets the economy ‘match fit for Brexit’. Public finances are not in good shape and Mr Hammond has no appetite for a major increase in borrowing. That, along with Wolfgang Schauble’s hard line on Brexit negotiations, won’t help the pound which has seen some reduction in short positions according to last week’s CFTC data. A brief sortie by EUR/GBP back up to 0.88 is possible.

Oil prices are higher this morning on hopes of OPEC will agree to cut supply at next week’s meeting in Vienna. The rally matches a build-up of speculative longs and sees a fair amount of scepticism from many in the market, but for now, helps NOK and CAD. Other than that, the market focus is going to be on the FOMC Minutes due for release on Wednesday before Thanksgiving takes over, and Eurozone PMI data, also on Wednesday

Alleviating a Global Dollar Shortage

November 21st, 2016 4:16 am

Via Luke Kawa at Bloomberg:

Why the Federal Reserve Must Become the World’s ‘Dealer of Last Resort’

The U.S. central bank could be left holding an elephant-sized bag as a global dollar-shortage bites.

As President-elect Donald Trump threatens to turn away from the rest of the world, the Federal Reserve will find itself under increasing pressure to extend a helping hand outwards.

That’s the prognosis from Credit Suisse AG Director of U.S. Economics Zoltan Pozsar, who contends that the U.S. central bank needs to take a much more activist approach to ensuring adequate availability of the world’s reserve currency in light of recent regulatory changes that have raised bank funding costs and constrained sources of dollar funding.

The liquidity financial institutions can draw upon has been drained by new rules that require banks to hold vast buffers of easy-to-sell assets, on the one hand, and a larger-than-expected exodus from prime money-market funds linked to financial reforms implemented in October, on the other. That’s induced a pick-up in bank funding costs that looks to be permanent, the analyst said.

That means that when foreign banks need dollars, they’re increasingly forced to procure them through currency swaps from U.S. banks and asset managers — who are themselves balance-sheet constrained. The cost of converting local currency payments in euros and yen into dollars is now at its most expensive since 2012, as implied by persistently negative cross-currency basis swap rates.

The net result is an “existential trilemma” for the Federal Reserve, as it is forced to choose between two of the following three objectives: shoring up banks’ balance sheets, stabilizing costs for onshore and offshore dollar borrowing, and an independent monetary policy.

The best possible solution, according to Pozsar, is for the U.S. central bank to let its own balance sheet go: serving as a “dealer of last resort” by way of “elephant size quantitative eurodollar easing,” in other words, that it should allow the unlimited use of its dollar swap lines to prevent foreign banks’ dollar borrowing costs from getting too high in an environment of constrained bank balance sheets.

“The tool to use is the Fed’s dollar swap lines but the aim would no longer be to backstop funding markets, but to police the range within which various cross currency bases trade,” Pozsar writes, arguing for the “fixed-price, full-allotment broadcast of eurodollars globally” by the U.S. central bank.

“In a way, quantitative eurodollar easing is the missing piece in a mosaic where the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan continue on with QE at an aggressive pace, and investors in their jurisdictions are filling their duration gaps with higher-yielding U.S. dollar assets on a hedged basis,” he explains. “But the private provision of [currency] swaps to hedge these flows can’t possibly keep pace with the public creation of euros and yen on massive scale.”

A failure to engage in such ‘QEE,’ he argues, would kneecap the Fed’s tightening cycle. Higher dollar funding costs imply tighter financial conditions and therefore slower economic growth abroad, which could impact the U.S. Meanwhile, higher currency conversion costs make it harder for foreign investors to meet their return targets and forces them to buy riskier assets, which could impact financial stability. Both those risks also tend go “hand-in-hand” with further appreciation of the dollar, Zoltan writes, which Fed officials see as reducing the need to tighten monetary policy by raising interest rates.

But in the near-term, Pozsar sees funding stresses for foreign banks swelling, with the three-month cross-currency basis for dollar-yen hitting negative 150 basis points.

One elephant in the room for the Pozsar’s pachydermic expansion of the Fed’s swap lines is the huge shift in U.S. politics augured in by President-elect Donald Trump. Analysts at Deutsche Bank AG last week pointed out that while Trump’s protectionist policies could exacerbate a global dollar shortage, they could also hamper the Fed’s ability to provide dollar liquidity to the rest of the globe via currency swap facilities.

“In a world of rising protectionism and anti-globalization sentiment it is doubtful that the commitment to such facilities can be taken for granted in the future,” the Deutsche Bank analysts wrote. “The provision of dollar liquidity caused material political backlash in the U.S. during 2008 and tolerance from a Trump-led administration is likely to be even smaller.

Will OPEC Cut Output?

November 20th, 2016 8:54 pm

Via Bloomberg:

  • Saudis seek collective curbs under ‘Four Pillar’ approach
  • Iran and Iraq pose challenge, Russia participation in question

OPEC says it’s close to a deal to cut oil output for the first time since 2008, a move that may halt a 2 1/2-year price slump. The actions of individual member states tell a different story. Here’s a look at the prospects for an agreement ahead of OPEC’s November 30 meeting:

Math isn’t the issue

The simple math supporting cuts looked solid at OPEC’s meetings in June and December. Prices then were way below most members’ fiscal break-even points. An output cut now of 1.5 million barrels a day, or 5 percent, would need to boost the oil price by only $2.50 a barrel for OPEC nations collectively to be better off. A $5 price increase would boost the value of what they pump by about $100 million a day.

They didn’t make those cuts. Why? Because Saudi Arabia was set on a policy of defending its own share of the global market and putting pressure on high-cost producers elsewhere, particularly surging output from U.S. shale formations. The world’s biggest exporter insisted that it wouldn’t tackle a global surplus alone.

‘Four pillars’

At an extraordinary Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries meeting in Algiers on September 28, the 14-nation group agreed in principle to production cuts that are to be ratified in Vienna on November 30. OPEC suggested curbing output to between 32.5 million and 33 million barrels a day. The group’s output in October was about 33.6 million barrels a day, according to its most recent Monthly Oil Market Report.

The first, most important, question that came out of the Algiers meeting was whether Saudi Arabia’s approach had really changed and, if so, to what extent? What’s now known is that the kingdom wants OPEC’s policy built around four pillars: action must be collective, equitable, transparent and credible with the market.

Critically, this means Saudi Arabia thinks Iraq must cut and Iran must freeze crude output. – The two nations are OPEC’s second and third largest producers and the main drivers of the group’s supply growth.

“The Saudis are in two minds,” said Bill Farren-Price, chief executive officer of Petroleum Policy Intelligence, a Winchester, U.K.-based consultancy. “It’s fairly straightforward what they need to do, but the willingness is not quite there as there’s a considerable lack of trust at this stage.”

Will either country play ball?

Iraq initially rejected OPEC’s proposed baseline for cutting production, a stance that showed signs of thawing on Friday. The nation submits one set of numbers for output, but OPEC publishes a second set. Because that second set would be used as the starting point — and because those secondary figures are lower than the ones that Iraq itself reports — Iraq would have to make a deeper commitment than the country believes is justified. Fixing that in a credible way remains a hurdle. Iraq’s Oil Minister Jabbar Al-Luaibi said Friday he was optimistic a deal would be reached, without going into details.

Iran in January emerged from international sanctions relating to its nuclear program. Accepting OPEC-related, Saudi Arabia-led restrictions could be a challenging decision domestically. Iran has said it won’t accept limits.

This means a deal isn’t clear cut, according to Helima Croft, chief commodities strategist at RBC Capital Markets LLC in New York.

“There’s a one in four chance it doesn’t fly, and that’s based on the Iranians being too aggressive in their negotiations — that Iran’s just going to free ride off the Saudis,” she said in a phone interview. “That’s just dangerous.”

Non-OPEC’s role

What’s still not clear yet is the extent to which non-member nations, in particular Russia, would join the effort if Saudi Arabia itself is to limit supply, or whether their participation is a deal-breaker. Saudi Arabia’s oil minister Khalid Al-Falih said on Oct. 19 that “many” non-member states are ready to cut.

But in practice, almost no non-OPEC nations will make deep, material cuts to their output that weren’t going to happen anyway. Russia is producing at a post-Soviet era high and has said it prefers a freeze to a cut. Forget about participation from the U.S. or Canada. In fact, they could be beneficiaries if there are restrictions, fetching higher prices and selling more crude to make up for the OPEC reduction.

Work to do

OPEC Secretary-General Mohammed Barkindo has been touring member nations to shore up support for an agreement before the Nov. 30 meeting. Some OPEC ministers traveled to Doha for talks last week, as did Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak.

The meeting didn’t resolve much. It certainly didn’t tackle any of the thorniest questions that OPEC must still overcome if coordinated measures are to happen.

“The road from the OPEC agreement in Algiers to the next official OPEC meeting in Vienna is long and bumpy,” said Harry Tchilinguirian, head of commodities strategy at BNP Paribas SA in London.

Trump Trade and Term Premium

November 20th, 2016 8:48 pm

Via WSJ:

Whatever President-elect Donald Trump’s policies bring about, the Treasury market’s fever has finally broken.

In the short time since Election Day, long-term Treasurys have experienced their swiftest setback in over seven years, with prices tumbling and yields shooting higher. The selloff reflects a view among many investors that Mr. Trump will usher in an era of stronger growth and higher inflation through a combination of increased spending, tax cuts and lighter regulation.

The Trump trade may not persist; there are too many unknowns about his policies and how they will affect the economy. The rise in the dollar since the election, for example, could make import costs fall, weighing on inflation.

Even if the market is wrong, the selloff has served as a violent reminder of the risks in the Treasury market. A look at the composition of the move up in yields suggests as much.

Since the election, the yield on the 10-year note has risen to 2.34% from 1.87%. But nearly all of that increase appears to reflect an increase in term premiums—the extra compensation investors demand to hold a longer-term bond to maturity versus what they estimate they could earn on a series of short-term securities over the same time frame.

By the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s measure, the term premium on the 10-year Treasury had risen to 0.07 percentage points as of Thursday from minus-0.29 percentage points on Election Day. It is the first time since early January it has been in positive territory. Typically term premiums are positive, since investors tend to worry they are underestimating how high rates might go in the future.

The term premium’s unusual dip into negative territory this year suggested investors were worried that Treasury yields would fall further below their already extremely low level. That bet had paid off until just before the election, and it became a losing one with the victory of Mr. Trump. But the election has shaken that low-yields-forever sentiment, and investors won’t soon forget the pain of their recent Treasury market losses.

It could be a very long time before Treasury yields again plumb the lows they reached this year.