Anticipating Weakness in the Corporate Bond Market

December 10th, 2014 7:36 pm

Via WSJ:

Bond Investors Look to Cull the Herd

Fund Managers Expect Bull Market to Weaken, Forcing Them to Identify Debt That Is Likely to Underperform

After years of strong gains and buying record amounts of debt, corporate-bond investors are facing a new challenge: what to sell.

Many fund managers expect the long bull market in bonds to weaken next year because of slowing economic growth overseas, plummeting oil prices and a potential increase in interest rates in the U.S.

That is forcing investors to identify bonds that are likely to lag behind the market, a task that stands to be more complicated than in past years, when widespread gains meant investors didn’t have to make as many hard choices on what to buy and sell.

Corporate debt in 2015 will be a bond picker’s market, said Jon Curran, a Boston-based portfolio manager and analyst at U.K.-based Standard Life Investments , which oversees $422 billion in assets.

The healthy gains seen in corporate bonds since the financial crisis could be more limited in coming years. Corporate executives are now beginning to take more risks to expand businesses as the U.S. economy improves, moves that could be detrimental to existing bondholders. Mergers and acquisitions are at the highest level in years, forcing some companies to offer generous yields on new debt sales.

Among the bonds being considered for disposal by some investors: debt from firms with heavy exposure to oil and energy, companies that appear to be struggling and have looming debt payments in coming years, or those that are considering taking on more debt for major acquisitions or share buybacks. Some investors said they are cautious about bonds that mature in the next few years because prices on that debt are expected to take a bigger hit than longer-dated bonds if the Federal Reserve raises short-term interest rates. Investors expect the Fed to raise rates as early as the middle of next year.

Scott Minerd, global chief investment officer at Guggenheim Partners, which manages more than $220 billion, said the firm is reviewing its bondholdings to assess the impact on companies if oil dropped to $25 a barrel. Oil is trading near $60 a barrel, sliding from more than $100 in June.

Standard Life’s Mr. Curran said he plans to steer clear of companies with low stock prices and low levels of debt, arguing that those conditions could entice management to pursue debt-financed stock buybacks or acquisitions. Companies pursuing those strategies tend to focus more on their share prices, many times at the expense of bond prices.

“Bondholders and shareholders are oftentimes just looking for different things,” Mr. Curran said.

Still, the worries highlight a potential change from the broad gains that dominated the years following the financial crisis. Prices of highly rated corporate debt in the U.S. have risen in four of the past five years and are on track for another gain this year, according to Barclays PLC data. And this year marked another record for U.S. corporate bond sales. So far in 2014, both investment-grade and junk-rated companies sold a little more than $1.5 trillion in the U.S. market, according to data provider Dealogic, eclipsing the previous record of $1.47 trillion set for all of last year.

But the performance of certain types of bonds has varied widely. Bonds from junk-rated energy companies, such as Chesapeake Energy Corp. and AmeriGas Partners LP, have lost 7.7% in total return this year, a figure that reflects interest payments and price changes, according to Barclays data. But bonds from junk-rated communications firms, including Charter Communications Inc. and CenturyLink Inc., are up 4.7%. Broadly, junk-rated corporate bonds are up 2.1%.

Highly rated corporate bonds are faring better, up 7%. But investors caution that much of that performance comes from Treasurys, which serve as a benchmark for high-grade corporate bonds. Treasurys have rallied this year, attracting overseas buyers given that yields are lower in other developed countries, with the 10-year note going from 3% at the end of 2013 to about 2.2% now, as bond yields move inversely to prices. If the Fed raises rates next year, that would increase Treasury yields and lower bond prices overall.

Others are more broadly optimistic about corporate bonds. Analysts at Morgan Stanley said they expect U.S. high-grade corporate bonds next year to return 3.1 percentage points more than comparable Treasurys, a figure they said is “significantly more than historical averages.”

Moreover, some bond investors are still willing to bet big on companies that have bright outlooks.

Medtronic Inc. sold $17 billion in debt this month, the largest corporate-bond sale of the year and tied for the second-largest ever. Amazon.com Inc. raised $6 billion, twice the size of its previous sale two years ago, amid projections for continued gains in the online-retail sector. Walgreen Co. in November sold $8 billion to help pay for its acquisition of European drugstore chain Alliance Boots GmbH.

Jim Dadura, a portfolio manager at investment firm Segall Bryant & Hamill, which oversees about $9.5 billion, said his firm bought about $35 million of Walgreen’s previously outstanding bond that matures in 2022, which dropped in price around the time of the merger announcement. Mr. Dadura said he thinks the bond will rally in coming years, given that Walgreen’s business is strong and now that the company successfully completed its large bond sale.

“Some of the uncertainty regarding the deal has dissipated,” Mr. Dadura said. “There’s been more clarity.”

Other investors are seeking out firms whose debt is offering more yield than rivals. Advent Capital Management, which oversees about $8 billion, owns bonds of Synovus Financial Corp. , a financial-services company and community bank. A Synovus bond maturing in 2019 recently traded with a yield of 4.445%. In comparison, a 2019 bond from BB&T Corp. , a larger and more highly rated company, recently traded to yield 2.059%.

If Synovus were to be acquired, it would likely be by a higher-rated competitor, boosting prices on Synovus’s existing bonds, said Doug Teresko, a portfolio manager at Advent. If it isn’t acquired, the company’s finances are still strengthening. It was recently upgraded by Moody’s Investors Service.

“We’re comfortable owning the position because we think it’s an improving credit,” Mr. Teresko said.

Corporate Bond Spreads

December 10th, 2014 7:30 pm

Via a fully paid up subscriber:

12/10 OPEN    12/10 CLOSE    CHANGE

C  24      126/123        128/125          +2
WFC 24      105/102        108/105          +3
BAC 24      127/124        130/127          +3
JPM 24      116/113        118/115          +2
GE  24        87/84          88/85            +1
GS  24      138/135        141/138          +3
MS  24      137/134        142/139          +5
IG23        65½/66        68/68½          +2½

4th Quarter GDP

December 10th, 2014 11:52 am

Via Stephen Stanley at Amherst Pierpont Securities:

In the past two quarters, extremely volatile spending on hospital services and some bad preliminary guesses by BEA led to unusually large revisions to GDP when the “hard” data came out with the Quarterly Services report (QSS).  In contrast, by the summer, things seem to have settled back to a fairly normal tenor in the health care field (uncertainty on the part of BEA statisticians around the impact of Obamacare seemed to be a catalyst for the volatility).  In my view, the Q3 release of the QSS implies a very small upward revision to consumer outlays for hospital services, just $2 or $3 billion in nominal terms (and less in real terms), i.e. probably not even worth a tenth.

At the moment, my running tally for Q3 GDP is up to 4¼%, versus the last print of 3.9%.  However, Q4 is shaping up in my view to be quite weak, at least for headline GDP.  My estimate for Q4 real GDP growth is only about 1%, as I expect inventory investment, net exports, and federal government outlays to all be down in the period.  Real domestic demand may be a solid 2.2% and private domestic demand could exceed a 3% annualized advance, boosted by a pickup in consumer spending (thank you, lower energy costs!).  So, the quarter is far from weak on an underlying basis, but the headline may be subject to some payback after back-to-back 4%+ quarters.

Negative on the Bond

December 10th, 2014 11:49 am

Via Bloomberg and I hope the analyst in story is trading with a tight stop:

RATES: 30Y Positioning Looks Like Before Taper Tantrum, CA Says
2014-12-10 15:41:05.625 GMT

By Monika Grabek
Dec. 10 (Bloomberg) — Dealer community is very long bonds
and positioning at ~$16b are “largest long positions” that
primary dealers have ever adopted in this tenor, Credit Agricole
strategist David Keeble writes in report.
* Large long is “all the more surprising” given balance
sheet constraints and relative to size of non-SOMA
securities in the market
* Bond sector beginning to “creak and groan under the
pressure of these positions”; last time positioning looked
like this was at start of “taper tantrum’”
* Given poor liquidity it’s often difficult to exit positions
so “dealers are forced to try and hedge them up” and
notably weak are securities around Bonds and Ultra contracts
* “Not optimistic” about 30Y auction tomorrow and believe
“dealers already have too much cash product at the long end
of the curve and the year end balance sheet contraction will
soon begin”

Excellent Analysis

December 10th, 2014 11:46 am

Via Richard Gilhooly at TDSecurities:

$/Yen continues to retrace some of the one-way move since Oct 31, as the Nikkei put in its first significant drop last night and year-end profit-taking amidst rising uncertainty continues to define the near-term outlook. The RBS decision to exit the JGB business reflects ongoing restructuring efforts but is also the first casualty of the BOJ’s aggressive monetary policy during which it has effectively monopolised the bond business via the printing press. That the Yen has strengthened in recent days owes to positions being brought down from extremely underweight Yen, to slightly less so, with plenty of room for a year-end liquidation trade if risk assets step up their level of selling from orderly reduction to disorderly liquidation.

A break of $60 on WTI crude would be the next level of price discovery in a market that is adrift and trying to find balance after OPEC decided to stand aside. With energy companies leading the sell-off in equities, this would also equate to the level at which orderly selling of risk assets becomes somewhat more dis-orderly. It would seem to be a reasonable bet that year-end acts as a magnet for clearing bad positions, much as the 10yr note yield peaked at 3.02% on December 31st last year.

TIPs break-evens are reversing yesterday’s dead-cat bounce and making new lows in the 5yr sector, at 1.28%, closing in on that 1.15% area that represented the 2010 lows pre-QE2.  The TLTRO is the focus in Europe tomorrow, with the range of expectations around €90-250bn, after the last disappointing take-down of €83bn. As we head into the FOMC meeting next week, with the TLTRO likely to again disappoint, there appears to be no reprieve for inflation break-evens as the Fed has essentially dismissed their relevance to policy making. Year-end liquidation is likely to become more relerelevant asditions dry up and lower levels of break-evens force the marginal players to cut positions. This will likely re-inforce current Fed thinking that illiquid conditions are leading to distorted readings of underlying inflationary conditions.

Spread Widening

December 10th, 2014 11:42 am

This was sent to me at 1104 from a fully paid up subscriber:

BANK/FIN SPREADS NOW A SOLID +5 IN THE GO-GO’s…. IG23 ~66.7
IS +2 FROM LAST NIGHT’S CLOSE… EURO STOXX -1.6% FROM
OVERNIGHT HIGHS… DJIA -0.80%/S&P -0.87%

What to Watch Today

December 10th, 2014 7:07 am

Via Bloomberg:

WHAT TO WATCH:
* (All times New York)
Economic Data
* 7:00am: MBA Mortgage Applications, Dec. 5 (prior -7.3%)
* 2:00pm: Monthly Budget Statement, Nov., est. -$65b (prior –
$135.226b)
Central Banks
* 11:15am: Bank of Canada’s Poloz holds news conference in
Ottawa
* 3:00pm: Reserve Bank of New Zealand seen maintaining 3.5%
cash rate
* 3:05pm: RBNZ’s Wheeler holds news conference
Supply
* 1:00pm: U.S. to sell $21b 10Y bills in reopening

FX

December 10th, 2014 7:05 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman:

– Markets are trying to stabilize from yesterday’s sharp moves
– Two key events this week remain ahead:  the ECB’s second TLTRO and US retail sales are both tomorrow
– China’s CPI slipped to a five-year low of 1.4% in November
– Indonesia’s recently elected president Jokowi is facing his first major popular challenge

Price action: The dollar is little changed against most major currencies.  The main exception was the dollar’s gain against the Norwegian krone, with the pair rising to trade near NOK7.18.  The euro continues to trade just above the $1.2350 level, while sterling is holding above the $1.5650 level.  Dollar/yen is trading at ¥119.40.  In the EM space, ZAR and PHP are underperforming, while KRW and TRY are outperforming.  The MSCI Asia Pacific index closed 1.1% lower, as the 3% rise in the Shanghai index was offset by the 2.25% drop in the Nikkei.  Euro Stoxx 600 is rebounding, up 0.5% near midday while S&P futures are pointing to a lower open.  Oil futures are down over 1%.

  • Markets are trying to stabilize from yesterday’s sharp moves.  Sentiment did not stabilize in Asia, but there is an attempt underway in Europe.  Asian shares were mostly lower, with the MSCI Asia-Pacific Index off about 1%, though China’s Shanghai Composite recouped much of yesterday’s loss, rising almost 3% today.  European stocks are higher, however.  The Dow Jones Stoxx 600 is up about 0.5% near midday in London.  
  • Interest rates mostly fell in the Asia-Pacific session, catching up with yesterday’s moves in North America.  In Europe, peripheral bond yields are higher, and the heightened political uncertainty in Greece continues to push yields higher.  Oil prices are down around $1 lower today and the dollar is consolidating yesterday’s losses.  The dollar is well within yesterday’s broad range against the yen, but conditions remain choppy.  The greenback was capped in front of JPY120.  Support was seen in Asia near JPY118.70.  The euro has been back and forth in about a third of a cent range below $1.24.  
  • Two key events this week remain ahead:  the ECB’s second TLTRO and US retail sales are both tomorrow.  We look for these two events to put the dollar on surer footing again.  A low take down of the TLTRO would increase speculation of a sovereign bond buying program, while a stronger participation would not exclude it.  At the same time, strength of US consumption (without much use of credit cards) when allowances are made for the drop in energy prices should underpin speculation that the Federal Reserve will drop or dilute the “considerable period” forward guidance.
  • In addition, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand meeting results will be announced later today.  Separately, Norway’s central bank meets tomorrow.  Earlier today, Norway reported a tick down in CPI as expected to 2.4% in November from 2.5%.  The core rate eased to 1.9% from 2.0%.  The Norges Bank is concerned about the non-oil economy.  The market has moved to discount a good part of a rate cut in the first part of 2015.  For its part, the RBNZ has already toned down its signals of additional rate hikes in its mini-tightening cycle.  
  • There are three economic reports of note today, besides Norway’s inflation.  First, China’s CPI slipped to a five-year low of 1.4% y/y in November.  Food prices eased to 2.3% from 2.5% and non-food prices are up 1.0% from 2.0% in October.  The deflation in producer prices accelerated to -2.7% from -2.2%.  The PBOC continued to fix the yuan stronger.  In recent days, this has not prevented the market from selling the yuan off.  However, today the yuan finished higher for a third day of relatively wide ranges.  
  • Second, France disappointed with a 0.8% decline in October industrial production.  The Bloomberg consensus called for a 0.2% increase.  Manufacturing fell by 0.2%, but the September series was cut from a 0.6% gain to 0.3%.  The French economy grew by 0.3% in Q3, outpacing the slowing German locomotive, but it is hard to be optimistic.  France also announced a revision to Q3 payrolls.  They fell by 0.3% rather than by 0.2%, and have fallen in two of the last three quarters.  Indeed, payrolls have fallen in seven of the past ten quarters and were flat in the other three.  The contours of the EMU’s problems are in part shaped by this persistent under-performance of Spain.  
  • Third, the UK reported October trade figures.  The UK reported a GBP2.024 bln trade deficit.  It was nearly 20% smaller than expected, and is the smallest shortfall since March.  The UK runs a large deficit in goods (~GBP9.6 bln).  It runs a large, but not as large, surplus on services (~GBP7.6 bln).  Sterling is flat on the day.  It has largely traded in a quarter cent range on either side of $1.5675.  For the better part of the past two week, sterling has flirted with the 20-day moving average, but has failed to close above it.  It is found at the mid-point of today’s range.  
  • The only feature in the North American session today is the EIA weekly estimate of US oil and gas inventories and refinery utilization.  Earlier, API reported a 4.4 mln barrel build in crude stocks and a smaller build in products.  EIA is expected to report a small fall in crude, but a 2.5 mln rise in gasoline stocks.  
  • Indonesia’s recently elected President Jokowi is facing his first major popular challenge. Millions of protestors have taken to the streets in Jakarta protesting for higher pay and eliminating outsourcing by state-owned companies. One of the main issues is that the increase in minimum wage was set at 11%, far less than the 30% increase in fuel prices.  Unlike Modi’s India, Jokowi wasn’t elected with such a strong mandate.  As we can see, his honeymoon period with voters has been rather short.  IDR is trading at multi year lows, in part as investors come to terms that Jokowi’s reformist administration will probably not be able to deliver all that was expected.
  • Turkey’s Q3 GDP came in at 1.7% y/y, well under expectations for 2.8%.  However disappointing, it is backward looking.  Investors are likely to give Turkey a pass for now given that the fall in commodity price will greatly improve the country’s terms of trade.  October current account will be reported Thursday, expected at -$1.9 bln vs. -$2.22 bln in September.  For USD/TRY, support seen near 2.25 and then 2.20, resistance seen near 2.30 and then 2.40.

Considerable Period Contretemps

December 9th, 2014 8:50 pm

Robin Harding of the FT has an informative post on the options which the FOMC faces as it confronts the challenge of removing the “considerable period” phrase from the post meeting guidance to fixed income market investors. My good friend and former colleague Steve Liddy made an interesting point in a note he wrote last evening when he noted that December (dealers are not in mood to provide liquidity as they are occupied fighting for a larger share of the bonus pool) is a tough time to announce a change which will roil the trading waters. Steve noted that the memory of the flash crash is still fresh and the 2013 taper tantrum has not yest faded. He thinks that the FOMC will retain the language until risk appetites are more robust when the calendar reads 2015.

Via Robin Harding at the FT:

December 9, 2014 1:07 pm

Fed has considerable trouble updating guidance on interest rates

Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed, would ‘like to get rid of the darned thing. I don’t think it means anything any more.’

The US Federal Reserve will debate next week whether to scrap its forecast that interest rates will stay low for a “considerable time”, but the closely watched phrase may survive a little longer.

December’s meeting of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee ends on Wednesday 17 and its task is clear: to acknowledge a run of strong data for the US economy that makes the Fed more confident it will be ready to raise rates by mid-2015.

But the data — such as last week’s job creation number of 321,000 — validate the FOMC’s already rosy 2015 growth forecast of 2.8 per cent, rather than marking a big new shock. The Fed will not want to lean too far forward and imply it is suddenly pondering an early rate rise.

The question is whether “considerable time” does the job, or whether its meaning is so hopelessly tangled that the FOMC prefers to start afresh.

There is a wide range of FOMC views about what to do, and since the choice is mainly tactical, it could be made at the meeting itself. A number of officials think “considerable time” is still doing useful work, as it signals rates are unlikely to go up at the next meeting or two. Others dislike referring to any fixed period of time.

In a recent interview with Market News International, John Williams of the San Francisco Fed implied he wants to keep the phrase, as it tells financial markets there is no hurry to raise interest rates. On Monday, Dennis Lockhart of the Atlanta Fed said, “I am not in a rush to drop it”. Both Mr Williams and Mr Lockhart are regarded as centrist, swing voters on the FOMC.

In October, the FOMC added a qualifier to “considerable time”, to say the clock starts ticking “following the end of its asset purchases this month”. That makes it easier to keep the phrase now. All the Fed needs to do is change “this month” to “in October”.

That phrasing would confirm the countdown began in October and that the “considerable time” is running out. But keeping the phrase signals rate rises are not imminent — not in January, and most likely not in March — thus avoiding a lurch in financial markets.

On the other hand, the FOMC may consider this too subtle and convoluted for anybody but dedicated Fed-watchers to make sense of. An unvarnished “considerable time” is the dovish alternative, but that is unlikely after the strength of the jobs report. The hawkish option is to scrap “considerable time” altogether.

“I’d like to get rid of the darned thing. I don’t think it means anything any more,” said Dallas Fed president Richard Fisher in a recent interview with the Financial Times.

Top Fed officials, such as vice-chair Stanley Fischer, have made plain their distaste for the language. “It’s clear we are closer to getting rid of that than we were a few months ago,” Mr Fischer said last week. But he added: “You may assume we’re not going to suddenly stop that and not say anything, just take it out and leave no guidance.”

There are a few other ways to signal rate rises are not imminent, but none is clean or easy. The Fed could say it will be “patient” in raising rates — a word appearing in many recent speeches — but the improvement on the status quo is modest. Chairwoman Janet Yellen would be pressed for a definition in the press conference that follows the meeting.

An alternative would be language tying a rise in interest rates to continued progress on unemployment and inflation. The FOMC, however, has struggled to agree on anything that covers the range of possible economic scenarios.

Hole in the Capital Structure

December 9th, 2014 8:36 pm

New rule promulgated by the Federal Reserve will leave JPMorgan Chase with a yawning gap in its capital structure which if fully implememted will force the bank to raise $22 billion (not exactly an odd lot).

Via the WSJ:

Fed Sets Tough New Capital Rule for Big Banks

J.P. Morgan Would Face $22 Billion Shortfall, Fed’s Fischer Indicates

 

WASHINGTON—The Federal Reserve proposed new capital requirements for the biggest U.S. banks that are tougher than those outlined by international regulators.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. would face a capital shortfall of $22 billion under the proposed new requirement, Fed Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer indicated on Tuesday. It is the only one of the eight biggest U.S. banks that would face a shortfall, he said.

During a question-and-answer session with Fed staff at an open board meeting, Mr. Fischer said that one bank is short “$22 billion”—an amount he called “a pretty impressive shortfall.” A few minutes later he indicated that firm was J.P. Morgan.

The proposal, which would require banks to set aside additional capital based on size, reliance on volatile forms of short-term funding and how interconnected a bank is to the financial system, is tougher than what international regulators outlined in Basel, Switzerland.

It would require that eight U.S. banks set aside almost twice as much capital under the surcharge plan as their foreign competitors. The proposal, which the Fed board is expected to vote on Tuesday afternoon, overrides concerns of bankers that such a move would put them at a global competitive disadvantage.

The rule, Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen said in a statement, “would encourage such firms to reduce their systemic footprint and lessen the threat that their failure could pose to overall financial stability.”

The Fed proposal would require the eight largest U.S. banks to have an additional capital buffer of between 1% and 4.5% of their risk-weighted assets, based on the relative threat a bank poses to the financial system as calculated by the Fed. Banks would have to meet the surcharge with common equity—considered the highest-quality form of regulatory capital. That is on top of a base 7% common equity capital requirement that most banks face.

Under the Fed rule, the Basel methodology would serve as a floor for the size of the surcharge for each bank, based on factors such as a firm’s size and complexity. The Fed added a second calculation that places significantly more weight on a firm’s reliance on short-term wholesale funding. A bank’s extra capital charge would be the higher of the two surcharges produced by the two different calculations. The second formula placing more weight on short-term funding reliance “generally would result in significantly higher surcharges” than the Basel formula, the Fed said.

The Fed didn’t publicly reveal what surcharge U.S. banks will face under their proposal since it is still working on what data will be used to determine a bank’s reliance on short-term funding. On average, U.S. banks would face a surcharge that is 1.8 times higher than the Basel proposal, Fed officials said.

The Fed said that the second calculation would apply to most of the eight big U.S. banks subject to the surcharge rule.

—James Sterngold contributed to this article.