Overnight Preview

December 15th, 2014 5:19 pm

Via Robert Sinche at Amherst Pierpont Securities:

SWEDEN: Riksbank Rate decision, but with the policy rate at 0.00% not much to do.

CHINA: First look at the Manufacturing Sector for December with the preliminary HSBC/Markit PMI. Index was 50.0 in November, and the BBerg consensus expects 49.8, which would be the first reading below 50 since May.

JAPAN: Markit/JMMA preliminary Manufacturing PMI for December, with the November reading of 52.0 in line with the average over the, last 4 months.

EURO ZONE: Preliminary Markit data on the December Manufacturing, Services and Composite PMIs, with the BBerg consensus expecting a slight uptick in the Composite to 51.5 from the 16-month low of 51.1 in November.

GERMANY: : Preliminary Markit data on the December Manufacturing, Services and Composite PMIs, with the BBerg consensus expecting a slight uptick in the Manufacturing PMI to 50.3 from a surprising 49.5 in November. The BBerg consensus also expects improvement in the ZEW Survey both for the Current Situation ans Expectations indexes.

UK: The plethora of PPI and CPI readings for November, with the BBerg consensus expecting the headline CPI to slip 0.1% to 1.2% YOY while the core holds at 1.5% YOY.

What to Watch Today

December 15th, 2014 7:17 am

Via Bloomberg:

WHAT TO WATCH:
* (All times New York)
Economic Data
* 8:30am: Empire Manufacturing, Dec., est. 12 (prior 10.16)
* 9:15am: Industrial Production m/m, Nov., est. 0.7% (prior
-0.1%)
* Capacity Utilization, Nov., est. 79.3% (prior 78.9%)
* Manufacturing (SIC) Production, Nov., est. 0.6% (prior
0.2%)
* Manufacturing (SIC) Production, Nov., est. 0.6% (prior
0.2%)</li></ul>
* 10:00am: NAHB Housing Market Index, Dec., est. 59 (prior 58)
* 4:00pm: Net Long-term TIC Flows, Oct. (prior $164.3b)
* Total Net TIC Flows, Oct. (prior -$55.6b)
* Total Net TIC Flows, Oct. (prior -$55.6b)</li></ul>
Central Banks
* 7:30pm: Reserve Bank of Australia issues Dec. minutes
Supply
* 11:00am: U.S. to announce plans for auction of 4W bills
* 11:30am: U.S. to sell $24b 3M bills, $26b 6M bills

FX

December 15th, 2014 6:39 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman:

Drivers for the Week Ahead

– The key event this week is the Federal Reserve’s last meeting of the year
– In terms of forward guidance, there are three phrases that are important
– The Japanese election was largely a foregone conclusion
– Greece’s parliament will have three chances to pick the next president, starting December 17

Price action:  The dollar is mostly firmer against the majors.  The exception is the yen, which is stronger against the dollar after weekend elections and a generally weaker than expected Tankan report.  Dollar/yen traded down to around 117.75 during the Asian session before recovering, currently near 118.60.  The euro is trading near the $1.2425 area, while cable is trading near $1.5660.  EM currencies are mostly weaker, with IDR, RUB, INR, and TRY underperforming.  KRW and SGD are outperforming on the day.  Oil prices are modestly higher.  MSCI Asia Pacific was down 1.1%, driven by a 1.6% drop in the Nikkei.  Risk sentiment has improved during the European session.  Euro Stoxx 600 is up 0.4% near midday, while S&P futures are pointing to a higher open.

  • The fundamental issue confronting investors is about supply and demand.  In recent weeks, as energy prices and other industrial commodity prices fell, investors focused on supply.  The stimulative effect of the fall in prices, and the likely policy response by some major central banks, such as the ECB, and possibly the BOJ, was seen as good for equity markets and weighed on the euro and yen.
  • However, this changed abruptly last week.  Several developments took place that shifted the focus to the weakness of demand.  OPEC and IEA cut their forecasts for oil demand next year.  China reported an unexpectedly large fall in imports and slower real sector performance.  Meanwhile, reports suggest China may reduce its growth target next year from 7.5% to 7.0%.  This follows on the heels of the recent cut in the ECB’s GDP projections for the euro zone. The Bundesbank also halved its German growth forecasts.
  • Ultimately, we suspect the second narrative is not as compelling as the first.  The downward revisions of demand were already foretold by the IMF and OECD, which had cut their world growth forecasts weeks ago.  A slowing of the Chinese economy has also been widely recognized.  It is hardly new news.
  • The same can is true of the ECB staff’s new GDP forecasts.  Is sluggish growth really surprising under the tutelage of order-liberal austerity?  Moreover, we note that these new forecasts did not include the growth (or impact on prices) of a significant decline in oil prices since the OPEC meeting.  Growth projections will likely be raised if the decline in energy prices is sustained.
  • Given the magnitude of the equity markets advance and euro and yen declines since the last swoon in the first half of October, a technical correction might not have needed much of a spark in the first place.   Year-end portfolio adjustments are likely under way, realizing some winners, perhaps to offset some losses, as in the energy patch.  As violent as the price action has been in recent days, the fundamental theme of divergence remains intact.  Even if these counter-trend moves cannot always be anticipated, they should be incorporated into investors’ strategies.  Assuming one’s understanding of the primary drivers has not changed, these setbacks offer important opportunities.
  • The key event this week is the Federal Reserve’s last meeting of the year.  It will include updated macroeconomic forecasts, and will be followed by a Yellen press conference.  As the Federal Reserve has done in the past, it should be expected to look largely past the deflationary implications of the decline in energy prices, and the short-run volatility in the equity market.
  • With the asset purchases over, the FOMC statement can be simpler.  The economic assessment may be upgraded.  The labor market has continued to improve, though not yet to acceptable levels.  Inflation is not trending toward the FOMC’s target.
  • In terms of forward guidance, there are three phrases that are important.  The first is the characterization of slack in the labor market.  Is it still “significant”?  We suspect that this phrase will be left in if the Fed adjusts the second phrase.  It involves the length of time between the end of QE and the first hike.  Is it still a “considerable time”?
  • Many observers have argued this phrase has largely been gutted already of any real meaning.  However, its absence would raise confidence in a rate hike in the middle of next year.  Recall Yellen’s faux pas at her first press conference.  She veered away from strategic ambiguity to define “considerable” as around six months.  Given the recognized importance of communication in this period of reliance on forward guidance, we believe that important changes in phrases and policy will be followed by the Chair’s press conference, like this week.  
  • The third important phrase comes at the end of the statement.  Even after the inflation and unemployment are consistent with the Fed’s mandates, economic conditions may warrant a lower Fed funds rate than officials would regard as the long-term equilibrium rate.  This suggests the terminal rate for this cycle will likely be lower than in past cycles.
  • The Fed also will announce new forecasts—the famous dot plot.  The general direction of forecasts may be interesting, but this tool has a high noise to signal ratio.  The fact of the matter is that the Fed forecasts have consistently been too high for inflation and unemployment.  Both of these will likely be cut.  It will be interesting to see if the Fed lowers its equilibrium rate down from the current 3.75%, which the market sees nearer 2.25%.
  • The Japanese election was largely a foregone conclusion.  The LDP and Komeito coalition will retain its super-majority.  Conventional wisdom is that this will permit Prime Minister Abe to pursue the weakest of his initiatives, the structural reforms the third arrow (the first two are fiscal and monetary stimulus).
  • This mistakes the problem.  Abe already enjoys a super-majority, and the structural reforms remain the least effective of this three-prong economic strategy.  The problem is that even though the DPJ secured a majority for several years, Japan remains very much a one-party state.  It continues to be dominated by the Liberal Democrat Party.  Even now, despite lack of strong public support for Abenomics, the DPJ and other small opposition parties have failed to make much headway.  They have failed to articulate a compelling alternative to Abenomics.
  • The biggest obstacles to Abe’s success appear to be largely internal to the LDP.   Like most if not all large parties, the LDP is a coalition.  The kinds of reforms that Abe is pushing for goes against the interests of some of the LDP’s traditional supporters, like the agricultural sector.
  • Look at Abe’s cabinet itself.  It is divided between the old guard, former prime ministers and privileged families, and agents of change.  Simply put then, Abe’s third arrow is compromised because the LDP itself is divided.  It is not clear, especially given the low public support for Abenomics itself, whether the election itself will shape the internal tension within the LDP.  
  • It may take some time to see if the election results changed the balance of power within the LDP.  The changes to the cabinet ministers and the debate over the supplemental budget may be early tells.  Abe’s political agenda, which includes restarting nuclear plants and allowing Japanese defense forces to be used to protect allies, is also controversial and will require the expenditure of his political capital.  
  • Abe is not the political risk-taker that he seemed to some when he initially called snap elections.  It is Greece Prime Minister Samaras who has taken significant political risks by bringing forward the presidential selection process.  It could lead to national elections, in which his party (New Democracy) is trailing behind the opposition Syriza.  Syriza wants to roll back much of the austerity, and that international official creditors restructure Greece’s debt to ease the burden.  
  • Greece’s parliament will have three chances to pick the next president, starting December 17.  The first two rounds require that 200 of the 300 members support the candidate.  In the third and final round, 180 votes are needed.  The governing coalition has 155 seats.  There are 46 swing seats, and that is where Samaras is battling.
  • The drama may climax in the third round that will be held on December 29.  Political insiders suggest that Samaras needs to secure at least 15 more seats in the first couple of rounds (to give 170 votes) for him to have a chance in the third round.  We anticipate it will come down to the wire.  The risk of failure and the eventual election of a Syriza government will keep investors on edge.
  • Many see Syriza issuing unacceptable demands on its official creditors that renew the risk of a Greek exodus from EMU.  There are two significant developments that have changed since the earlier existential issue.  First, with a primary budget surplus, Greece is in a considerably better negotiating position.  Second, the creditors will feel strengthened by the institutional capacity built over the last couple of years that will leaves Europe much better able to cope with the consequences of a Greek exit.
  • Samaras took a significant political risk, but it is not necessarily suicidal as it is being portrayed.  Syriza may be ahead in the polls, but its lead is not insurmountable, and more importantly, would need coalition partners.  It is not clear who this could be.  The opposition in Greece is very ideological and very fragmented.  
  • Even if Syriza holds on to its 5% lead over the ND, it still is well short of a majority.  It may be the biggest party, but Syriza may not be able to put together a coalition.  It may not lead the next government after all.  This does not mean that Greek assets cannot sell off further.  To the contrary, it warns that Greek assets may dramatically overshoot before recovering if the center prevails.

Potential January Issuers

December 15th, 2014 6:15 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT PIPELINE: GE Cap, JPM Among Historical January Issuers
2014-12-15 10:19:54.838 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — The following deals may be added to the IG
calendar in the coming days, weeks, months:
* JPM a likely January issuer, based on historical record
* GE Cap may open 2015 IG issuance
* Bank of India (SBIIN) Baa3/BBB-, hires Barc/C/HSBC/JPM for
USD issue
* Zimmer Holdings (ZMH) Baa1/A-, proposed acquisition of
Biomet (BMET); up to $7.66b of senior unsecured notes may be
part of debt financing
* Merck (MRK) A2/AA, says $9.5b of new debt to be issued in
Cubist Pharmaceuticals (CBST) acquisition; committed
acquisition financing in place; deal closure expected 1Q15
* Reliance Industries (RILIN) Baa2/BBB+, mandates
Barc/C/DB/JPM/MS for USD issue
* Valspar (VAL) Baa2/BBB, investor calls began Oct 8, via
BofAML/GS/WFS; deal may follow; VAL last seen in Jan 2012
* Republic of Indonesia (INDON) Baa3/BB+, selects
BofAML/C/DB/GS/HSBC/JPM/SoGen/SCB for offshore bond deals
next year
* Actavis (ACT) offers to buy Allergan for $219/Shr in cash
and stock; has committed bridge facilities via JPM/Miz/WFS;
statement
* Halliburton (HAL) A2/A, to buy Baker Hughes (BHI) A2/A for
$34.6b; HAL intends to use cash on hand and fully committed
debt financing via BofAML/CS
* Reynolds American (RAI) Baa2/BBB-, up to $9b bridge loan
from C/JPM for its Lorillard Tobacco (LO) Baa2/BBB-merger
agreement; debt issuance is planned
* AT&T (T) A3/A-, buying DirecTV (DTV) Baa2/BBB; AT&T “plans
to assume $18.6 billion in net debt, issue $34 billion of
new stock and borrow $7.5 billion to acquire DirecTV,”
Erich Marriott, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, writes in
note
* Orix Corp (ORIX) Baa2/A-, 144a/Reg-S deal may follow
investor meetings via BofAML/MS; last issued in USD March
2012

Secondary market Corporate Bond Trading on Friday

December 15th, 2014 6:07 am

Via the good folks at Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Volume Falls, Spreads at New Wides for 2014
2014-12-15 10:46:53.396 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — The final Trace count for secondary trading
fell to $10.1b vs $15.3b Thursday and $16b the previous Friday.
* 144a trading added another $1.5b of IG volume
* AAPL 2.40% 2023 topped the most active list with 2-way
client flows accounting for 85% of volume
* F 3.875% 2015 was next with client flows taking 81% of
volume
* VIA 1.25% 2015 was 3rd; client flows at 100% of volume
* VZ 6.55% 2043 was 4th; client flows took 98% of volume
* NAB 2.75% 2015 was most active 144a IG issue; client flows
accounted for 86% of volume
* BofAML IG Master Index at +145, a new wide for 2014, vs
+143; +106, the low for 2014 and the tightest spread since
July 2007 was seen June 24
* Standard & Poor’s Global Fixed Income Research IG Index at
+175, a new wide for 2014, vs +172; +140, a 2014 low and new
post-crisis low was seen July 30
* S&P HY index made a new wide for 2014 at +619 vs +598
* BofAML HY Index at +547, a new wide for 2014, widest spread
since Dec 2012, vs +525
* Markit CDX.IG.22 5Y Index closed at 72.6 vs 68.8; 55 was
seen July 3, the low for 2014 and the lowest level since Oct
2007; 2014 high of 74.5 was seen Feb 3
* No IG issuance Friday vs $1b Thursday, $2.15b Wednesday,
none Tuesday and $3.55b Monday
* Month’s IG issuance now $60.5b; YTD $1.395t
* M&A-related deals dominate list for 2015
* GE Capital may open 2015 issuance
* JPM a likely January issuer, based on historical record

December 15 2015 Opening

December 15th, 2014 6:05 am

Prices of Treasury coupon securities have tumbled in overseas trading reversing the some of the gains attained in risk off environment which prevailed on Friday. The belly of the curve has borne the burden of the sell off today (as it has for most of the last nine months). The yield on the benchmark 5 year note has climbed to 1.567 from 1.513. The 7 year note has been  mercilessly clubbed as its yield has climbed to 1.905 from 1.846. The yield on the 10 year note has climbed to 2.127 from 2.083. The yield on the Long Bond has risen to a still parsimonious 2.763 from a lunatic 2.737 at the Friday close. I believe the lowest close on the Long Bond during the 2008  at the height of the post Lehman bankruptcy panic was in December and the yield was about 2.52 percent. I do not have Bloomberg so treat that subject as my memory is increasingly addled. As I noted the belly has taken a drubbing. The 5 s 10s spread is now at 56 versus 57 at the close. The 5s 30s spread is at a cycle low of 120.1 versus 122.4 at the close. The 10s 30s spread is also at a cycle low of 64.1 versus a 65.4 close. The 5s 7s 10s spread cheapened to 11.6 from 9.6. The 2s 5s 10s spread cheapened to 43.9 from 39.5. Clients have been active with bank portfolios selling 5 year notes and foreign central banks buying 5 year notes.

Economic data released overnight was sparse and did not move markets. The most publicized report was the Tankan in Japan which showed the mood of large manufacturers souring as sentiment among that group slipped to 12 in December from 13 in September. Equity markets in Asia sold off reflecting the drop in the US on Friday. European equities are rebounding sharply this morning and S and P futures have retraced about half of Friday’s losses with about a 16 point gain (at 550AM New York time). Oil has dominated the conversation of late and that product is showing some life this morning as Brent crude is currently up more than one percent. Given the extent of the recent declines that is a feeble bounce and reflects the near term oversold nature of that market. There was  an OPEC honcho speaking this weekend and he posited $40 oil in his verbal musings.

The main event this week is the FOMC meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday and the Yellen press conference on Friday. I lean to the view that they do not send us a blatant signal on rate hikes this time. Maybe they tweak the “considerable period” language but I think that the tweak will be accompanied by body language which softens the impact. The rest of the world is suffering through economic malaise and will be holding rates at very low levels for a considerable period of time. I recognize that zero percent is a relic of the financial crisis and rates probably have to move somewhat higher. However, my thought is that maybe the FOMC raises the funds rate to 1 percent and then adopts the behavior of the Bank of Canada and keeps it at that level forever. There is just not enough inflation coursing to through the global economy to justify a traditional series of rate hikes.

Krugman Bucks the Consensus

December 14th, 2014 9:00 pm

New York Times columnist, Nobel Prize winner and Princeton Professor, Paul Krugman has challenged the consensus view that the Federal Reserve will hike rates in 2015.He thinks the lack of inflation and weak global economy will keep the central bank in the monetary weeds in the new year.

Via Bloomberg:

Krugman Fighting Consensus Says 2015 Fed Rate Increase Unlikely

By Alaa Shahine Dec 14, 2014 2:45 PM ET

 

Paul Krugman, challenging the consensus of economists and the Federal Reserve’s forecasts, said policy makers are unlikely to raise interest rates in 2015 as they struggle to spur inflation amid sluggish global economic growth.

“When push comes to shove they’re going to look and say: ‘It’s a pretty weak world economy out there, we don’t see any inflation, and the risk if we raise rates and it turns out we were mistaken is just so huge’,” the 2008 Nobel laureate said in Dubai. “It’s certainly a real possibility that they’ll go ahead and do it, but probably not, and for what it’s worth I and others are trying to bully them into not doing it.”

Krugman, author of “End This Depression Now!”, has criticized the U.S. government and central bank for not doing more to revive the economy after the financial crisis, and his position now pits him against most Fed officials.

Krugman said financial markets are signaling that policy makers will delay raising borrowing costs. His remarks build on arguments he’s made in his New York Times column. On Dec. 10 he wrote that the Fed risked “letting itself being bullied into doing the wrong thing” by raising interest rates prematurely.

Yields on 10-year U.S. Treasuries (USGG10YR) are at the lowest level since mid-2013, and inflation expectations have dropped with the slump in oil prices. The Federal Open Market Committee, which next meets to set rates on Dec. 16-17, will take energy costs into account in its assessment of inflation and the economy.

Higher Rates

Top Fed officials, including Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer and New York Fed President William C. Dudley, said this month they expect the oil slump to spur domestic consumption, playing down the risk that it could push inflation further below the central bank’s 2 percent goal.

Unlike Krugman, Fed officials and economists surveyed by Bloomberg expect higher U.S. rates in 2015.

The benchmark federal funds rate will rise to 1.375 percent by the end of next year, according to the median projection of Fed officials released in September. The median estimate of economists in Bloomberg’s latest survey is for a rate of 1 percent rate at year-end.

U.S. unemployment held at a six-year low of 5.8 percent last month, and economic growth is forecast to accelerate next year. Yet Krugman and others including HSBC Holdings Plc Chief Economist Stephen King have argued that the recent drop in U.S. unemployment masks low wage growth, suggesting that the economy is still struggling to recover.

‘Depressed Economy’

“There is a very strong case that the United States is still a very depressed economy,” Krugman said during a presentation on the state of the world economy at the Arab Strategy Forum in Dubai.

While most major central banks view inflation of about 2 percent as the yardstick for price stability, more than a quarter of the 90 economies monitored by researcher Capital Economics Ltd. have a rate below 1 percent, the most since 2009.

The outlook for global economic growth may deteriorate in 2015 with risks of crises in China and the euro area, Krugman said, as the European Central Bank fails to dodge deflation and the world’s second-biggest economy struggles to bolster domestic demand.

China’s economic growth will probably slow to 7 percent in 2015, the worst since at least 2007, according to economists’ estimates on Bloomberg.

“The two scary spots are the euro area and China,” said Krugman, who also warned of the risk of private-sector bankruptcies in Russia amid a slump in the currency.

Krugman was a frequent critic of former President George W. Bush over issues from the war in Iraq to tax cuts, and he has also found fault with President Barack Obama and the Fed for not doing more to spur growth. He has repeatedly argued that the $831 billion stimulus package that Obama championed in 2009 was too small and that former Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke was too timid.

From the Oh Canada Department

December 14th, 2014 9:13 am

Marketwatch carries a story on the dangers which cheap oil pose to the heavily dependent on oil Canadian economy:

By Mark DeCambre

Published: Dec 12, 2014 8:18 a.m. ET

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — While the U.S. financial system — as well as many international banks — has gotten hopped up on a wide assortment of financial opiates and stumbled through more than a dozen bank-fueled crises through the decades, Canada boasts a stellar track record of banking sobriety.

However, a spectacular death spiral in crude-oil futures — West Texas Intermediate CLF5, -4.10% settled Thursday at $59.95, a more than five-year low — threatens to deliver a serious shock to the banking system of the U.S.’s northern neighbor, according a research note published Thursday by Pavilion Global Markets.

Canada ranks as one the world’s five largest energy producers and a net exporter of oil, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

So, a big drop in oil would pose several risks to Canada’s oil-dependent economy.

“The drop in oil prices, as mentioned above, will have wide-ranging implications on the Canadian economy,” Pavilion strategists Pierre Lapointe and Alex Bellefleur said in the note.

It’s not just that Canada’s banks will find themselves saddled with souring loans from underwater energy producers. The problem, Pavilion argues, is that Canada’s employment rate could suffer as oil-related businesses are forced to close.

Here’s how they put it:

“In this context, the risk to Canadian banks doesn’t stem necessarily from a narrow view of loans to oil companies, but more from a broad macro risk perspective. As employment in the oil industry declines, a negative income and wealth shock to many households will take place, impacting a variety of loans (credit card, mortgage) on Canadian bank balance sheets.”

Cracks in Canada’s oil sector are already being felt. Ivanhoe Energy Inc. IVAN, -40.00% an oil-exploration company based in Vancouver, said Friday that it is scrambling to work out a plan to address liquidity concerns, and said it may default on a Dec. 31 debt payment.

The Pavilion note underscores the complex dynamic that oil’s decline presents. Average folks likely will reap the benefits from cheaper fuel, but in the long run, the negative impact on the overall economy could outweigh this upside. Particularly in places like oil-dependent Western Canada — but also in shale-producing regions of the U.S.

Of the Canadian banking system, Pavilion concludes that “from a macro standpoint, we see many risks for the sector, and few unrecognized opportunities for [earnings] growth.”

How big of a boon oil’s decline offers remains to be seen. But if it’s descent causes a wave of oil-company implosions, few will be cheering in the end.

Bond Bloodbath?

December 14th, 2014 8:00 am

Via the FT:

Warnings of a potential bloodbath in bonds

There is a big disconnect between the US Federal Reserve and the international bond markets. It is a disconnect that could lead to one of the biggest sell-offs in bonds for a long time. Some fund managers even say 2015 might be like 1994 all over again, when the government bond markets crashed as the Fed aggressively raised interest rates.

Wesley Sparks, the head of US fixed income at Schroders, the UK fund house, says he has never seen such a big divergence between US central bank projections for interest rate rises, as laid out in the so-called dot plot chart that shows where voting members of the Fed think benchmark rates will be at the end of upcoming years, and the forecast of the market, expressed in Fed fund futures.

US central bank policy makers expect the main Fed funds rate to rise from near zero today to 1.25 per cent by the end of next year, with the first rate rise pencilled in for next June. The market projects rates to end 2015 at 0.50 per cent, with the first rate rise in October.

By the end of 2016, the Fed’s policy makers forecast rates at 2.75 per cent, while the market has them at 1.50 per cent. By the end of 2017, Fed policy makers expect rates to be 3.75 per cent compared with market forecasts of 2.0 per cent.

Bill Eigen, head of absolute return fixed income at JPMorgan Asset Management, warns of a potential bloodbath in bonds next year should the market continue ignoring the warnings of aggressive rate rises that the Fed has clearly signalled in its dot plot charts.

Of course, his worries might prove unfounded. The 32-year bull run in bonds may keep powering on as it has this year, despite dire warnings of a big correction in the market at the start of 2014 from almost every large fund manager and analyst on Wall Street and in the City of London.

It has to be pointed out that the likelihood of full-blown quantitative easing in Europe (which is expected early next year), the benign global inflation outlook and continuing sluggish growth in many industrialised economies suggest that bond yields, which have an inverse relationship with prices, might remain low in 2015.

But in the US, there has to be risks that yields will rise sharply, should the Fed stick to its forecasts and start tightening policy aggressively in the middle of next year.

With yields on 10-year US Treasuries close to all-time lows and nearly a percentage point lower than they were when the year began, yields surely have only one direction to go — and that is up. If US yields do head north, then yields in other government bonds are likely to follow, despite benign inflationary pressures and the launch of QE by the European Central Bank.

It means 2015 could be a tricky year for fixed income fund managers, particularly those running long-only portfolios. This might explain why absolute return funds have become more popular, as these funds can short the market and use derivatives to protect capital in the event of a blow-up in bonds.

For example, some absolute return funds have bought emerging market credit default swaps to protect portfolios against a sharp jump in yields. Mr Eigen has as much as 60 per cent of cash in his flagship fund, which he will only put to work once the bond market corrects.

It is a mug’s game trying to predict markets, as the spectacular failure of most bond forecasts this year proved. But with Fed policy makers and the markets so badly out of sync over the path of rates, there has to be a possibility that the bond markets in 2015 will experience a similar collapse to 1994, when yields nearly doubled in value

UAE Oil Minister Says OPEC in No Hurry to Cut Production

December 14th, 2014 7:51 am

The oil minister of the United Arab Emirates said today  that even oil at $40 would not motivate the (former) cartel to cut production. He repeated that the group is waiting for the market to stabilize and that process could take six months.

Via Bloomberg:

U.A.E. Sees OPEC Output Unchanged Even If Oil Falls to $40

OPEC will stand by its decision not to cut crude output even if oil prices fall as low as $40 a barrel and will wait at least three months before considering an emergency meeting, the United Arab Emirates’ energy minister said.

OPEC won’t immediately change its Nov. 27 decision to keep the group’s collective output target unchanged at 30 million barrels a day, Suhail Al-Mazrouei said. Venezuela supports an OPEC meeting given the price slide, though the country hasn’t officially requested one, an official at Venezuela’s foreign ministry said Dec. 12. The group is due to meet again on June 5.

“We are not going to change our minds because the prices went to $60 or to $40,” Mazrouei told Bloomberg at a conference in Dubai. “We’re not targeting a price; the market will stabilize itself.” He said current conditions don’t justify an extraordinary OPEC meeting. “We need to wait for at least a quarter” to consider an urgent session, he said.

OPEC’s 12 members pumped 30.56 million barrels a day in November, exceeding their collective target for a sixth straight month, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait this month deepened discounts on shipments to Asia, feeding speculation that they’re fighting for market share amid a glut fed by surging U.S. shale production. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries supplies about 40 percent of the world’s oil.

Prices Tumble

Brent crude, a pricing benchmark for more than half of the world’s oil, slumped 2.9 percent to $61.85 a barrel in London on Dec. 12, for the lowest close since July 2009. Brent has tumbled 20 percent since Nov. 26, the day before OPEC decided to maintain production. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude dropped 3.6 percent to $57.81 in New York, the least since May 2009.

The U.A.E. hasn’t been informed of any plan for an emergency meeting, Al-Mazrouei said. OPEC Secretary-General Abdalla El-Badri said, “we don’t know,” when asked at the same conference about the possibility of such a meeting.

An increase of about 6 million barrels a day in non-OPEC supply, together with speculation in oil markets, triggered the recent drop in prices, El-Badri said, without specifying dates for the higher output by producers outside the group such as the U.S. and Russia. Prices will rebound soon due to changes in the global economic cycle, he said, without giving details.

Clear Picture

“We will not have a real picture about oil prices until the end of the first half of 2015,” El-Badri said. Price will have settled by the second half of next year, and OPEC will have a clear idea by then about “the required measures,” he said.

OPEC kept its target unchanged last month because the group was uncertain whether a cut ranging from 1 million to 1.5 million barrels a day would have boosted prices, El-Badri said. The group wasn’t seeking to put pressure on the U.S. or Russia by maintaining output, he said.

“Our expectation in OPEC is that after 2020, the oil industry in the U.S. will decline” due to the nation’s low reserves, he said. The U.S. won’t become self-sufficient in oil and will continue to depend on Middle Eastern supply, El-Badri said.

U.S. oil drillers last week idled the most rigs in almost two years as crude tumbled below $60 a barrel. Producers including ConocoPhillips (COP) have curbed spending, and the number of rigs is declining from a record 1,609, threatening to slow the shale-drilling boom that has propelled U.S. production to the highest level in three decades.

To contact the reporters on this story: Anthony DiPaola in Dubai at adipaola@bloomberg.net; Mahmoud Habboush in Abu Dhabi at mhabboush@bloomberg.net