Hilsenrath Article

February 25th, 2015 9:16 am

Via Jon Hilsenrath at the WSJ:

Tuesday’s testimony to Congress by Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen read like a test-drive for the central bank’s March policy statement.

She suggested the Fed will remove from its policy statement an assurance that it will be patient before raising interest rates. Instead, the Fed’s guidance on interest rates could look something like this line in her testimony:

Provided that labor market conditions continue to improve and further improvement is expected, the Committee anticipates that it will be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate when, on the basis of incoming data, the Committee is reasonably confident that inflation will move back over the medium term toward our 2 percent objective.

 

Many officials want their decisions and guidance on interest rates to be “data dependent” and forward-looking, meaning tied to the flow of incoming economic data and the evolution of their own forecasts for growth, jobs and inflation. The above statement has those qualities. It is also consistent with the Fed’s dual mandate, meaning it is focused on jobs and inflation.

In translation, the line means the Fed will raise rates as long as the job market keeps firing quickly and once officials are confident inflation is on a path back toward 2% over the next few years.

Ms. Yellen previewed the “reasonably confident” formulation in her press conference statement in December. It also showed up in minutes to the December policy meeting.

The formulation raises a new question: What will it take to make the Fed confident that inflation will pick up toward 2%? It has run below that threshold for 31 straight months, and year-over-year measures of prices are set to keep running below it in the near-term because of low oil prices.

Minutes of the Fed’s January policy meeting laid out many markers of what would make officials confident that they’re moving away from low inflation. “Many” Fed officials said further job market gains and continued economic growth would bolster their confidence. It is not yet clear if that is enough. “Some” wanted to see stable or rising levels of core, ex-food-and-energy inflation; “a number” wanted to see increases in bond market measures of inflation compensation; “several” wanted to see wage gains.

This is the next frontier in the Fed’s long march toward interest rate normalcy. Several officials have said they want to start raising rates by June. It still isn’t clear, however, if they’ll reach the inflation confidence threshold by then.

-By Jon Hilsenrath

Early Analysis and Thoughts

February 25th, 2015 9:01 am

Via Richard Gilhooly at TDSecurities:

Rates have traded in a tight range overnight after a strong rally across the curve yesterday, which followed a 7bp rally in bonds on Monday. The 2.56% auction stop in bonds is now in play and we did test that level overnight before some profit-taking set-in. The equivalent level on 10s at the 1pm auction time for bonds was 1.96% and a close below these levels in coming days would suggest another leg in the rally. For now, with 5 and 7yr supply ahead, some consolidation is in order at least until we see the strength of demand at the 5yr today. Month-end is supporting the back-end and 5-30s is 1.5bp flatter this morning on the combination of supply and index extension.

TIPs see the largest extension on Friday, but breaks were weaker yesterday due to the strength of the nominal rally and also on the comments from Yellen which suggested the Fed continues to look through both the ‘transitory’ headline inflation collapse and also the collapse in longer maturity break-evens. The suggestion that “as best we can tell” lower break-evens does not reflect longer-term inflation expectations indicates that inflation risk, or term premium having fallen is the entire reason for the drop in long-term Breaks. This is indeed a departure for the Fed and their reasoning appears based on survey measures being stable while market-based measures of inflation have collapsed.

This is a loss-loss situation for TIPs, as any material increase in break-evens will be met with the start of rate hikes and any further decline will likely be ignored by the Fed until such time as supported by survey measures. It appears the Fed wants to believe in the Phillips curve push to wage growth at lower U/E rates more than the information the TIPs market is conveying that such wage growth will continue to elude the Fed, as it has done for several years now.

Tomorrow’s CPI release and upcoming CPI prints will be important for rate hike expectations, more so than payroll releases, with the wage component continuing to take priority within that report.

Merrill Lynch on Credit Spreads and Other Stuff

February 24th, 2015 7:19 pm

Via Merrill Lynch Research:

  • A Fed maintaining ZIRP for a longer period of time is bullish for credit spreads, whereas earlier liftoff is bearish.
  • However, a bearish sentiment for spreads would re-appear if rates again decline much further inside 2% on the 10-year.
  • This especially as supply volumes accelerate into March.
  • ZIRP is friend, liftoff is foe. Today’s big decline in rates and credit spreads, and modestly higher stocks and lower USD in reaction to Fed Chair Janet Yellen’s fairly unsurprising testimony to Congress suggest that the market had feared more hawkish language – such as putting a June rate hike on the table. This market reaction also highlights the two opposite drivers of credit spreads for the remainder of the year – a favorable short term environment that supports our tactically overweight stance on investment grade credit (see: Credit Market Strategist: Tactically overweight 06 February 2015) vs. headwinds as the Fed hikes rates and investors unreach from yield. A Fed maintaining ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) for a longer period of time is bullish for credit spreads, whereas earlier liftoff is bearish. Hence the decline in both interest rates and credit spreads. However, a more bearish sentiment for spreads would re-appear should interest rates again decline much further inside 2% on the 10-year, as yield sensitive investors drive spreads wider. This especially as supply volumes accelerate into March. – Hans Mikkelsen (Page 4)
  • Small decline in CDX IG net longs. Non-dealer investor’s net long-risk positioning declined modestly to $45.1bn for CDX IG last week (as of February 20th), down from $46.6bn net long positioning in the prior week. At the same time, net long risk investor positioning for CDX HY rose to $4.6bn last week from $4.4bn in the prior week. Given that CDX HY is about four times more volatile as IG, the current $4.6bn net long positioning for CDX HY corresponds to about $18.2bn CDX IG net long in terms of risk. This implies that the current net long positioning in CDX IG remains significantly above that of CDX HY in terms of risk. – Jon Lieberkind (Page 6)
  • Continued strong appreciation in home prices. Case-Shiller national home prices rose 0.73% mom in December, following a solid 0.76% gain in November. As a result, the yoy growth rate decelerated to 4.62% from 4.66%. On a 4Q/4Q basis national home price appreciation slowed to 4.6% versus 10.8% in 2013. This was stronger than our forecast of 4.0%, and suggests some upside to our outlook for home price appreciation to slow to 3.5% 4Q/4Q this year. Meanwhile, the 20-city composite surprised to the upside, growing 0.87% mom versus consensus at 0.60%, and pushing the yoy rate up to 4.46% from 4.29%. Every city in the composite saw a monthly gain in home prices: Denver, San Francisco, Seattle, Detroit, Atlanta, Portland, and Los Angeles all seeing greater than 1.0% mom growth, while Las Vegas was last in the pack with 0.17% mom growth. – Alexander Lin (Page 7)
  • Confidence pulls back from peak. Consumer confidence tumbled to 96.4 in February, pulling back from the post-recession high of 103.8 (revised higher from 102.9). This was below expectations of 99.5, but is still the second highest level of confidence so far in this recovery. Weather and the bottoming out of gasoline prices were likely negative factors this month, however consumers are still feeling great about the economy amid a strong labor market. Looking at the details, the present situation index moderated to 110.2 from 113.0, while the expectations index dropped to 87.2 from 97.0, the latter contributing the most to the headline decline. Meanwhile, the labor differential remained in the single digits, though worsened modestly to -5.7 from -3.9.

HP Warns and Blames the Mighty Greenback

February 24th, 2015 4:42 pm

Via the FT:

CompaniesHewlett-Packard cuts outlook amid currency swings

Another name added to the long-list of US multinationals struggling with the dollar’s strength.

Hewlett-Packard slashed its full-year earnings guidance by more than a third on Tuesday as currency swings weigh on its results.

The PC manufacturer said net earnings would range between $2.03 and $2.23 a share, below guidance set last November for earnings of $3.23-$3.43 a share. Adjusting for certain items, HP said it would earn $3.53-$3.73, 30 cents lower than its previous forecast, which it attributed to the currency movements.

Meg Whitman, chairman and chief executive officer of HP, said the company’s turnround remained “on track”, despite the foreign exchange issues, which were “significantly greater than we anticipated in November”.

We’ll work hard to offset these impacts through re-pricing and productivity, but fully mitigating currency movements of this size would require reducing investments and mortgaging our future. We won’t do that.

The outlook accompanied HP’s fiscal first quarter results, which showed a 5 per cent decline in revenues from a year earlier to $26.8bn. Profits fell 4 per cent to $1.37bn, or 73 cents a share. Adjusting for certain items, HP said it earned 92 cents a share.

Analysts on Wall Street had expected the company to report adjusted earnings of 91 cents a share on sales of $27.3bn for the three months to the end of January.

Shares slipped 4 per cent in after-hours trading.

Yellen Recap

February 24th, 2015 1:35 pm

Via Stephen Stanley at Amherst Pierpont Securities:

On the economy, Yellen’s testimony repeated the general thrust of the January FOMC minutes.  With regards to the two parts of the dual mandate, the verdict is mixed.  Yellen noted that the employment situation “has been improving along many dimensions.”  She concludes with “considerable progress has been achieved in the recovery of the labor market, though room for further improvement remains.”  In terms of GDP and spending, she notes that the economy has been “increasing at a solid rate.”  She expects continued above trend growth going forward, though she acknowledges that housing remains sluggish and the economy has not yet reached potential.

 

She acknowledges the fall in long-term bond yields globally but is not particularly concerned, attributing the declines to “disappointing foreign growth and changes in monetary policy abroad.”  She discusses the fall in oil prices as well, noting that “it will likely be a significant overall plus, on net, for our economy.”

 

She weighs in on the downside risks to the U.S. economy posed by foreign economic developments.  Her tone is not as negative as that of the FOMC minutes from a few meetings ago, as she points out that “the pace of growth abroad appears to have stepped up slightly.”  She also notes that stimulus from foreign central banks and the drop in oil prices could boost growth more than expected.

 

On inflation, she highlights the fall in headline inflation due to the decline in energy costs.  She notes that core inflation has also slowed, “in part reflecting declines in the prices of many imported items and perhaps also some pass-through of lower energy costs into core consumer prices.”  She asserts that inflation expectations are stable, blaming the fall in inflation compensation on other factors.  Her bottom line is that “the Committee expects inflation to decline further in the near term before rising gradually toward 2 percent over the medium term as the labor market improves further and the transitory effects of lower energy prices and other factors dissipate, but we will continue to monitor inflation developments closely.”

 

As I predicted in my summary, Yellen leaves the impression that the timing of liftoff will mainly be determined by the inflation outlook.  The Fed has seen enough on the growth and labor market fronts, but wants to see core inflation level off after the deceleration seen in recent months.  As an aside, I think it is worth noting that there is no mention of wages anywhere in the inflation discussion.  Market participants have put too high of a weight on wages in the inflation debate, and the Fed has not validated that view, even a Phillips Curve devotee like Yellen.  Wages are a proxy (one of many) for measuring labor market slack, and, as noted above, I think the Fed has pretty much seen enough on that front, so while market participants may choose to continue to overreact to developments in wages, Yellen certainly did not justify such a response (having said that, you all know that I expect wages to perk up significantly this year, and the news headlines in recent days and weeks are finally beginning to bear that out).

 

On monetary policy, Yellen explains why the Fed holds its current stance, including the use of the “patient” forward guidance language.  She repeats that “patient” means no move for “at least the next couple of FOMC meetings.”  She then tells us how things will go moving forward: “If economic conditions continue to improve, as the Committee anticipates, the Committee will at some point begin considering an increase in the target range for the federal funds rate on a meeting-by-meeting basis. Before then, the Committee will change its forward guidance.”  So, the FOMC will take “patient” out when it believes that things have progressed to a point that it can begin to consider a rate hike on a meeting-to-meeting basis.

 

Once it takes that step, there is no predetermined timetable.  “However, it is important to emphasize that a modification of the forward guidance should not be read as indicating that the Committee will necessarily increase the target range in a couple of meetings. Instead the modification should be understood as reflecting the Committee’s judgment that conditions have improved to the point where it will soon be the case that a change in the target range could be warranted at any meeting.”

 

She then synthesizes the checklist introduced in the January FOMC minutes for what is required to justify liftoff.  Basically, it’s only a little firming in inflation.  “Provided that labor market conditions continue to improve and further improvement is expected, the Committee anticipates that it will be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate when, on the basis of incoming data, the Committee is reasonably confident that inflation will move back over the medium term toward our 2 percent objective.”

 

She concludes by repeating the “lower for longer” thought that policy will probably remain accommodative even well after the Fed is meeting its dual mandate objectives.

 

On policy normalization, she walks through the mechanics of how rate hikes will work.  The Fed will be focused on moving rates higher rather than “by actively managing the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet.”  This means no asset sales any time soon.  On rates, the Fed will use the IOER rate as its primary tool, with the overnight RRP facility and other tools as supplements to defend their target range for short rates.  The supplementary tools will be phased out when they are no longer needed, so the RRP structure, term deposit facility, etc. are all merely with us until the balance sheet returns to normal.  Finally, in terms of managing the size of the balance sheet down, “the Committee intends to reduce its securities holdings in a gradual and predictable manner primarily by ceasing to reinvest repayments of principal from securities held by the Federal Reserve.”  Eventually, the FOMC has no intention of maintaining a large balance sheet permanently and it wants to return to a Treasuries-only stance: “it is the Committee’s intention to hold, in the longer run, no more securities than necessary for the efficient and effective implementation of monetary policy, and that these securities be primarily Treasury securities.”

 

For me, the bottom line is that Chair Yellen sets the stage for taking “patient” out soon.  It does not have to be in March, but I think it will be.  At that point, a rate hike becomes a live option beginning in June.  Whether they move or not in June will depend mostly on how the inflation outlook evolves by then.  I look for sufficient firming to justify a move in June.  Others will no doubt disagree, but the data will be the final arbiter.

What to Watch for Today

February 23rd, 2015 7:00 am

Via Bloomberg:

WHAT TO WATCH:
* (All times New York)
Economic Data
* 8:30am: Chicago Fed Nat Activity Index, Jan., est. 0.05
(prior -0.05)
* 10:00am: Existing Home Sales, Jan., est. 4.95m (prior 5.04m)
* Existing Home Sales m/m, Jan., est. -1.8% (prior 2.4%)
* Existing Home Sales m/m, Jan., est. -1.8% (prior 2.4%)</li></ul>
* 10:30am: Dallas Fed Mfg Activity, Feb., est. -4.0 (prior
-4.4)
* Mortgage Foreclosures, 4Q (prior 2.39%)
* Mortgage Delinquencies, 4Q (prior 5.85%)
* Mortgage Delinquencies, 4Q (prior 5.85%)</li></ul>
Supply
11:00am: U.S. to announce plans for auction of 4W bills
11:30am: U.S. to sell $26b 3M bills, $26b 6M bills

FX

February 23rd, 2015 6:45 am

Via Marc Chandler at Brown Brothers Harriman:

Drivers for the Week Ahead

– The Greek issue has been sufficiently resolved for now, so investors’ focus will shift to deflation, economic recovery and the Fed
– The cyclical recoveries in the euro area and Japan continued into the early part of this year
– We expect Yellen to make it clear in her testimony this week that the Fed’s patience is not limitless

Price action:  The dollar is broadly stronger on the day, especially against the Scandies, but recent ranges remain intact.  The euro fell back towards $1.1300, but still not breaking any new ground from the month’s range.  Sterling is also lower, at $1.5350, but also within last week’s range.  The dollar rose to NOK 7.6150 against the Norwegian krone, and to SEK8.4500 against the Swedish krona, but failed to make a clean break on the upside against these resistance levels.  The dollar is trading just above ¥119.0 against the yen.  On the EM side, RUB and TRY are underperforming and MYR is outperforming.  The Nikkei was up 0.7% and major European indices are also higher, with Euro Stoxx 600 up 0.4% near midday and the FTSE is down slightly.  S&P futures are pointing to a lower open.  Greece is on holiday today, but the reaction to the recent headlines in periphery sovereign debt yields has been positive.  Portuguese yields are down as much as 9 bps and its 10-years yield has dipped below the US for the first time since 2007.

  • The Greek issue has been sufficiently resolved for now, so investors’ focus will shift elsewhere in the week ahead.  The answers to three questions will dominate the market’s attention.  (1) How strong are the deflationary forces? (2) Are the cyclical recoveries still intact? (3) What is the outlook for Fed policy?
  • The January inflation readings from the US, eurozone, and Japan will be released in the coming days.  The euro area preliminary data has already been reported.  This week’s report is expected to confirm the -0.6% year-over-year headline rate and a 0.6% core rate.  Germany and Spain will offer preliminary February readings.  Both are not expected to deviate much from the January pace of -0.5% and -1.5%, respectively.  The monetary response, the ECB’s accelerated asset purchase plan which will include sovereign bonds, will be launched next month.  
  • Even if the ECB’s bond buying program can be successfully implemented, for which there is increasing skepticism, it is not clear that it will boost inflation.  The BOJ’s balance sheet is expanding by 1.4% a month.  In H1 15 it will expand by more than the ECB’s over 18-month initial projection.  Yet, it is not clear that Japan has slayed its deflation demon.  When allowances are made for the retail sales tax increase last April, Japanese CPI is barely positive.  Neither the nation’s January report nor Tokyo’s February report is expected to change much from the previous readings.  
  • Headline US CPI is expected to slip into negative territory (-0.1%) on a year-over-year basis, with a 0.6% decline in January alone.  Such a report will likely spur speculation that the Fed cannot raise interest rates with negative headline inflation.  However, the key for policy makers is not headline inflation.  They accept that the dramatic decline in energy prices dampens inflation, but its impact on prices is seen as transitory.  By this time next year, the bulk of the impact will be dropped by the base effect.  The core rate, which in the US excludes food and energy, is more stable and is expected to be unchanged from the 1.6% paces seen in December.  
  • The cyclical recoveries in the euro area and Japan continued into the early part of this year.  Perhaps encouraged by strong December exports (17% year-over-year), Japan’s industrial production is forecast to have risen by 3% in January.  Output rose 0.8% last December and 1.0% in November.
  • New data from the euro area is thin next week.  Outside of the inflation reports, there are other two reports that confirm the cyclical recovery.  First, Germany’s IFO business survey came out lower than expected at 106.8, but still better than last month’s reading.  Second, money supply growth (M3) has begun strengthening, and this is expected to have continued when January data is reported on Thursday.  The same can be said for bank lending.
  • Apart from the housing market, which has continued to disappoint, the main new information from the US will be durable goods orders.  The January orders are expected to have increased for the first time since last October.  A modest 1.6% increase is expected after last December’s 3.4% drop.  
  • New from the world’s second largest economy may not be as favorable.   China’s February PMI readings will be reported this week.  The risk is on the downside.  The economy is in a transition and growth has slowed.  This should not be exaggerated.  Chinese officials appear to believe that within reason, this slowing is acceptable and “natural” given the labor force dynamics.  It also allows a catching of the collective breath and reducing some excesses as it continues its quest for “the China dream” (doubling GDP and GDP per capita between 2010 and 2020).  From a global point of view, even assuming 6.75% growth this year, China will contribute about $660 bln to the world economy.  This still outstrips the US.  Making a generous assumption of 3% growth this year, the US economy will contribute around $520 bln to the world economy.
  • Some link the likely downward revision in Q4 US GDP to below 2.0% from 2.6% and the fact that Q1 15 growth is looking soft (2.3-2.5%) to the dovish January FOMC minutes.  We suspect this is a mistake and expect Fed Chair Yellen to correct this impression in her testimony before Congress.  
  • What resonates with the Fed is not GDP, which as we all know is a flawed measure, but the fact that personal consumption rose 4.3% in Q4, the strongest in more than a decade.  Moreover, for those concerned about debt-financed consumption, revolving credit has barely grown.  What will resonate with the Fed is that in the last three months the US created over a million jobs for the first time in nearly 20 years.  
  • The leadership at the Federal Reserve had led many to expect a mid-year lift off.  However, doubts have grown, and this has corresponded with a consolidative phase for the dollar.  After the FOMC minutes, the December Fed funds futures contract implied an average effective rate of less than 50 bp.  Although the market corrected this view a little before the weekend, we expect Yellen make it clear the Fed’s patience is not limitless.   A hike, not today or tomorrow, but four months from now is still reasonable.  
  • The way the Fed communicated its tapering decision was effective and appears to be deployed again.  Tell the market what you are thinking about doing.  Offer some time frame.  Give investors plenty of time to adjust.  The timing is data driven, but it is not completely unpredictable.  Finally, execute.  
  • The Fed rightfully did not let the economic contraction in Q1 14 distract it from its tapering strategy, despite the appeal of many.  It understands that the recent slowing follows a well-above trend six month growth (April-September) that is partly being corrected now.  Even the expected downward revision to Q4 GDP is not all negative, as the downward revision in inventories suggests that some of those excess being absorbed.  
  • The Fed’s leadership has been preparing the market gradually for a change in US monetary policy.  The emergency settings that were so necessary in the darkest days are no longer needed.  To be sure, the economy is not firing on all cylinders, but no one is really talking about a dramatic increase in interest rates.  
  • Look for Yellen to be patient with US Congress as she explains why the Fed’s patience with emergency-level rates may be drawing to a close, and that this is a constructive sign.  It is also through this lens that Yellen will likely address questions about the dollar.  The exchange value of the dollar is one of the factors taken into account in assessing the monetary conditions.  
  • It is true that, all else being equal, a rise of the dollar on a broad-traded weighted basis adjusted for inflation will dampen growth.  However, all things are not equal, and the strength of the dollar has been offset by the decline in interest rates and oil.  The dollar’s strength is a reflection of the relative performance of the US economy.  Of course, part of the dollar’s rise has been fueled by expectations of a Fed hike.  Such anticipation will not be an important hurdle to the decision to hike rates later.

Secondary market Corporate Bond Trading Friday

February 23rd, 2015 6:38 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Client Flows in Long Bonds Led Trading Session
2015-02-23 10:59:42.575 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Secondary IG trading ended with a Trace
count of $13.4b Friday vs $17.1b Thursday, $13.1b last Friday.
* 10-DMA $16.5b
* 144a trading added $2.4b of IG volume vs $2b Thursday, $1.5b
the previous Friday
* Most active issues longer than 3 years
* MS 4.30% 2045 was first with client flows accounting for
100% of volume
* ECACN 6.50% 2019 was next with client flows taking 100%
of volume
* BNSF 4.90% 2044 was 3rd, client flows at 45%
* VZ 6.55% 2043 was 4th, client flows at 100%
* VZ 6.55% 2043 was 4th, client flows at 100%</li></ul>
* Hiland Partners (KMI) 7.25% 2020 was most active 144a issue;
client flows took 94% of the volume
* BofAML IG Master Index at +138, a new tight for 2015, vs
+139; 2014 range was +151, seen Dec 16; +106, the low and
tightest spread since July 2007 was seen June 24
* Standard & Poor’s Global Fixed Income Research IG Index at
+174 vs +175; +183 was the wide for 2015; +182, the wide for
2014, was seen Jan. 16; +140, the 2014 low and post-crisis
low was seen July 30, 2014
* Markit CDX.IG.22 5Y Index at 63.4 vs 64.2; 76.1, the wide
for 2014 was seen Dec 16; 55 was seen July 3, the low for
2014 and the lowest level since Oct 2007
* Weekly issuance stats; tenors, ratings, sectors
* Month’s IG issuance $93.1b; YTD $223.35b
* Pipeline of expected deals, includes possible M&A-related
issuance

Winter Weather

February 22nd, 2015 6:09 pm

The WSJ posts an informative article on the cold weather and the economy. The article posits that the cold weather and storms this year will not produce the same consequences as last year’s successive polar vortex iterations.

Via the WSJ:

Harsh Winter Weather Yet to Take Economic Toll

Worst of this year’s storms have been concentrated in New England

A weekend storm that brought snow and ice from the nation’s midsection to the East Coast is the latest in a string of harsh weather events this year. But economists say the impact on the economy so far doesn’t appear to be as bad as a year ago, when an extended cold snap slowed business activity in much of the country.

The outlook could change, however, if the frigid temperatures and hefty snowfalls continue into March.

Although many states in the eastern half of the U.S. have faced unusually harsh storms and low temperatures, the worst of this year’s storms have been concentrated in New England, said Evan Gold, senior vice president of client services at weather advisory firm Planalytics. Last year was worse, he said, “when there were more weather events across more population areas.”

Much of the western U.S. has had unseasonable warm temperatures this winter.

Recent data on housing starts and builder confidence suggest many builders in winter-prone areas are taking a breather, which will slow first-quarter growth on the margin. After the Commerce Department reported last week that housing starts fell 2% in January, economists at Barclays trimmed their growth estimate for first-quarter gross domestic product to an annual rate of 2.1% from the previous 2.2%. That projected rate is below the 2.6% increase posted in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Closed-down construction sites hurt other sectors. Joseph Lavato said new construction “is nonexistent” in Chicopee, Mass., hard-hit by winter snow, which means no big orders for his plumbing-supply company. Although he is selling to plumbers who are repairing existing pipes, he said that “for new construction, we sell the plumbing for the whole house instead of a few pieces to the fix-it guys.”

The good news, say economists, is that construction activity is being delayed, not canceled. “There’s time to make up the loss in housing,” said Douglas Handler, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight. That is what happened in early 2014 when construction plunged in the winter and later rebounded.

While builders’ spring activity will add to economic growth in the second quarter, a segment of discretionary consumer spending may be lost forever. Small businesses, restaurants and bars lose out when consumers stay home. “Suppose I buy a cup of coffee from Starbucks every day on my way to work,” said Mr. Gold of Planalytics. “If I’m snowed in one day, am I going to buy two cups of coffee from Starbucks the next day? I don’t think so.”

Weather’s other large economic impact is on the supply chain, Mr. Handler said. “Last winter, companies couldn’t get supplies,” he said. “Manufacturers couldn’t ship out finished goods. Exports suffered.” Businesses couldn’t manage their inventories as they wanted.

The extreme slowdown in inventory accumulation accounted for more than half of the 2.1% drop in all economic activity in the first quarter of 2014. Much like the housing rebound, a return to more normal inventory building contributed significantly to economic growth in last year’s second quarter.

Mr. Handler said that despite frigid temperatures and snowstorms, merchandise is still moving across the U.S., and the bigger risk to distribution channels was the labor slowdown at West Coast ports. That threat may soon ease. The tentative agreement reachedbetween labor unions and port owners on Friday should allow port activity to return to normal, though it may take many weeks to off load all the waiting ships.

Write to Kathleen Madigan at kathleen.madigan@wsj.com

 

Pruning the Balance Sheet

February 20th, 2015 7:35 am

Via Bloomberg:

IG CREDIT: Dealer Positions Fell to Record Lows, Led by HY
2015-02-20 11:23:54.689 GMT

By Robert Elson
(Bloomberg) — Dealer positions in corporate bonds fell
$2.3b to $21.1b as of Feb. 11, a new low in the series Fed began
in April 2013. $45.9b, seen March 5, 2014 was the high for the
series Fed began April 2013. $23b, the previous low, was in Aug
2013.
* Investment grade positions:
* Very short issues rose $204m to $2.9b; $4.7b, seen Nov
19, was the high for 2014 and for the series that began
in April 2013; $1.2b low Aug 2013
* Positions between 13 months and 5Y rose $369m to $5.5b
* Positions 5-10Y rose $520m to -$306m
* Positions longer than 10Y rose $371m to $1.9b
* Positions longer than 10Y rose $371m to $1.9b</li></ul>
* Commercial paper positions fell $80m to $9.9b; $19.9b, the
series high, seen Mar 5, 2014; series low $4.7b, Dec. 31
* High yield positions fell $3.6b to $1.2b; $1.1b, a series
low was seen Oct 22, 2014; high of $8.4b was seen June 2013
* Total dealer positions in all Treasuries rose $11.8b to
$33.4b; $7.8b, seen Dec. 31 was the lowest level since 2011;
in a look-back to Jan 2007 the high was $146b in Oct 2013, –
$194b was seen July 2007